Article ID: CBB647472223

Belmont in Europe: A Mostly Indirect Influence (2020)

unapi

This paper traces the reception of the Belmont Report in Europe and its influence on the development of European research ethics thinking and European research ethics systems. It is very difficult to trace a clear, linear reception history because it is difficult to disentangle the influence of the Report from the influence of concurrent developments, such as the 1975 revision of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and the requirement for research ethics review in the Vancouver Group’s 1978 “Uniform Requirements for Manuscript Submission.” The Report’s insistence that the focus of research ethics should be the rights and interests of the individual research subject, and the use of an ethical framework and not ethical theory as the basis of analysis and justification of recommendations, were nevertheless very important for the development of research ethics. The divergence between Europe and the US in the governance of non-biomedical research can at least partly be explained by the absence of strong drivers for the introduction of research ethics committees outside of biomedicine in Europe, and by the ability of non-biomedical researchers to mobilize effectively against the introduction of such committees. [End Page 262]

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB647472223/

Similar Citations

Article Franklin G. Miller; (2020)
Revisiting the Distinction and the Connection Between Research and Practice (/isis/citation/CBB749659220/)

Article Tom L. Beauchamp; (2020)
The Origins and Drafting of the Belmont Report (/isis/citation/CBB975056514/)

Article Jake Earl; (2020)
The Belmont Report and Innovative Practice (/isis/citation/CBB040690748/)

Article Franklin G. Miller; Jonathan Kimmelman; (2020)
Introduction to the Special Issue on the Belmont Report (/isis/citation/CBB685361978/)

Article Will Schupmann; Jonathan D. Moreno; (2020)
Belmont in Context (/isis/citation/CBB480211234/)

Thesis M. Sadegh Foghani; (2018)
Ayatollahs and Embryos: Science, Politics, and Religion in Post-Revolutionary Iran (/isis/citation/CBB063043602/)

Book Ian McGonigle; (2021)
Genomic Citizenship: The Molecularization of Identity in the Contemporary Middle East (/isis/citation/CBB092609489/)

Book Edward Shorter; Max Fink; (2018)
The Madness of Fear: A History of Catatonia (/isis/citation/CBB544899834/)

Article Robert G. W. Kirk; Edmund Ramsden; (2021)
"Havens of mercy”: health, medical research, and the governance of the movement of dogs in twentieth-century America (/isis/citation/CBB713465624/)

Book Anita Guerrini; (2022)
Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Aristotle to CRISPR (/isis/citation/CBB030333227/)

Article Alexander R. Fiorentino; Olaf Dammann; (2015)
Evidence, illness, and causation: An epidemiological perspective on the Russo–Williamson Thesis (/isis/citation/CBB556890631/)

Book Sydney A. Halpern; (2021)
Dangerous Medicine: The Story behind Human Experiments with Hepatitis (/isis/citation/CBB697182722/)

Authors & Contributors
Kimmelman, Jonathan
Miller, Franklin G.
Jukola, Saana
Bickford, Andrew
Earl, Jake
Kirk, Robert G. W.
Concepts
Biology and ethics; bioethics
Medical research
Biomedicine
Belmont Report (Bioethics)
Moral and ethical aspects
Medicine and ethics
Time Periods
20th century, late
20th century
21st century
Early modern
Modern
Medieval
Places
United States
United Kingdom
Qatar
Europe
Israel
Iran
Institutions
National Institute of Health (U.S.)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment