Jasanoff, Sheila (Author)
Sebastian Pfotenhauer (Author)
Innovation studies continue to struggle with an apparent disconnect between innovation’s supposedly universal dynamics and a sense that policy frameworks and associated instruments of innovation are often ineffectual or even harmful when transported across regions or countries. Using a cross-country comparative analysis of three implementations of the ‘MIT model’ of innovation in the UK, Portugal and Singapore, we show how key features in the design, implementation and performance of the model cannot be explained as mere variations on an identical solution to the same underlying problem. We draw on the concept of sociotechnical imaginaries to show how implementations of the ‘same’ innovation model – and with it the notion of ‘innovation’ itself – are co-produced with locally specific diagnoses of a societal deficiency and equally specific understandings of acceptable remedies. Our analysis thus flips the conventional notion of ‘best-practice transfer’ on its head: Instead of asking ‘how well’ an innovation model has been implemented, we analyze the differences among the three importations to reveal the idiosyncratic ways in which each country imagines the purpose of innovation. We replace the notion of innovation as a ‘panacea’ – a universal fix for all social woes – with that of innovation-as-diagnosis in which a particular ‘cure’ is ‘prescribed’ for a ‘diagnosed’ societal ‘pathology,’ which may in turn trigger ‘reactions’ within the receiving body. This approach offers new possibilities for theorizing how and where culture matters in innovation policy. It suggests that the ‘successes’ and ‘failures’ of innovation models are not a matter of how well societies are able to implement a sound, universal model, but more about how effectively they articulate their imaginaries of innovation and tailor their strategies accordingly.
...More
Article
Edward B Kang;
(2022)
Biometric imaginaries: Formatting voice, body, identity to data
(/isis/citation/CBB345469713/)
Article
Chih-yuan Yang;
Bronislaw Szerszynski;
Brian Wynne;
(September 2018)
The Making of Power Shortage: The Sociotechnical Imaginary of Nationalist High Modernism and Its Pragmatic Rationality in Electricity Planning in Taiwan
(/isis/citation/CBB183913124/)
Article
Sergio Urueña;
(2022)
Anticipation and modal power: Opening up and closing down the momentum of sociotechnical systems
(/isis/citation/CBB466032431/)
Book
Sheila Jasanoff;
Sang-Hyun Kim;
(2015)
Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power
(/isis/citation/CBB690565115/)
Article
Neelke Doorn;
Behnam Taebi;
(May 2018)
Rawls’s Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Method for Engaged Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Potentials and Limitations for the Context of Technological Risks
(/isis/citation/CBB722391619/)
Article
Markku Lehtonen;
(2023)
Brand New or More of the Same Nuclear? (De)Constructing the Economic Promise of the European Pressurised Reactor in France and the UK
(/isis/citation/CBB930799952/)
Article
Miao Lu;
Jack Linchuan Qiu;
(2023)
Transfer or Translation? Rethinking Traveling Technologies from the Global South
(/isis/citation/CBB075981875/)
Book
D'Andrea, Luciano;
(2009)
Handbook on the socialisation of scientific and technological research: A tool for promoting science and technology socialisation policies addressed to policy makers, research and innovation actors and stakeholders
(/isis/citation/CBB001181559/)
Article
James Chike Nwankwo;
(February-June 2022)
Analysis of Impact of Industry 4.0 on Africa, Eastern Europe and US: A Case Study of Cyber-Security and Sociopolitical Dynamics of Nigeria, Russia and USA
(/isis/citation/CBB289866626/)
Article
Astrid Mager;
(April 2017)
Search engine imaginary: Visions and values in the co-production of search technology and Europe
(/isis/citation/CBB569340330/)
Article
Jessica M. Smith;
Abraham S.D. Tidwell;
(June 2016)
The everyday lives of energy transitions: Contested sociotechnical imaginaries in the American West
(/isis/citation/CBB037435071/)
Article
Leslie, Stuart W.;
Kargon, Robert;
Kargon, Robert Hugh;
(2006)
Exporting MIT: Science, Technology, and Nation-Building in India and Iran
(/isis/citation/CBB000670748/)
Book
Sébastien Lechevalier;
(2019)
Innovation beyond technology : Science for society and interdisciplinary approaches
(/isis/citation/CBB607770289/)
Book
Davids, C. A.;
(2013)
Religion, Technology, and the Great and Little Divergences: China and Europe Compared, c. 700--1800
(/isis/citation/CBB001321240/)
Book
Kingery, W. D.;
(1991)
Japanese/American technological innovation: The influence of cultural differences on Japanese and American innovation in advanced materials: Proceedings of the Symposium on Japanese/American Technological Innovation held December 1990 at the University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
(/isis/citation/CBB001180814/)
Article
Brice Laurent;
Liliana Doganova;
Clément Gasull;
Fabian Muniesa;
(2021)
The Test Bed Island: Tech Business Experimentalism and Exception in Singapore
(/isis/citation/CBB212017759/)
Article
Sheila Jasanoff;
Ian McGonigle;
Hallam Stevens;
(2021)
Science and Technology for Humanity: An STS View from Singapore
(/isis/citation/CBB712642449/)
Article
Christy Spackman;
(June 2020)
In smell’s shadow: Materials and politics at the edge of perception
(/isis/citation/CBB826002581/)
Article
Bindu Panikkar;
Jonathan Tollefson;
(October 2018)
Land as material, knowledge and relationships: Resource extraction and subsistence imaginaries in Bristol Bay, Alaska
(/isis/citation/CBB856275346/)
Article
Jaya Keaney;
(2022)
The Racializing Womb: Surrogacy and Epigenetic Kinship
(/isis/citation/CBB389875479/)
Be the first to comment!