Article ID: CBB640965055

Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the ‘MIT model’ in three political cultures (December 2017)

unapi

Innovation studies continue to struggle with an apparent disconnect between innovation’s supposedly universal dynamics and a sense that policy frameworks and associated instruments of innovation are often ineffectual or even harmful when transported across regions or countries. Using a cross-country comparative analysis of three implementations of the ‘MIT model’ of innovation in the UK, Portugal and Singapore, we show how key features in the design, implementation and performance of the model cannot be explained as mere variations on an identical solution to the same underlying problem. We draw on the concept of sociotechnical imaginaries to show how implementations of the ‘same’ innovation model – and with it the notion of ‘innovation’ itself – are co-produced with locally specific diagnoses of a societal deficiency and equally specific understandings of acceptable remedies. Our analysis thus flips the conventional notion of ‘best-practice transfer’ on its head: Instead of asking ‘how well’ an innovation model has been implemented, we analyze the differences among the three importations to reveal the idiosyncratic ways in which each country imagines the purpose of innovation. We replace the notion of innovation as a ‘panacea’ – a universal fix for all social woes – with that of innovation-as-diagnosis in which a particular ‘cure’ is ‘prescribed’ for a ‘diagnosed’ societal ‘pathology,’ which may in turn trigger ‘reactions’ within the receiving body. This approach offers new possibilities for theorizing how and where culture matters in innovation policy. It suggests that the ‘successes’ and ‘failures’ of innovation models are not a matter of how well societies are able to implement a sound, universal model, but more about how effectively they articulate their imaginaries of innovation and tailor their strategies accordingly.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB640965055/

Similar Citations

Article Edward B Kang; (2022)
Biometric imaginaries: Formatting voice, body, identity to data

Article Sergio Urueña; (2022)
Anticipation and modal power: Opening up and closing down the momentum of sociotechnical systems

Article Chih-yuan Yang; Bronislaw Szerszynski; Brian Wynne; (September 2018)
The Making of Power Shortage: The Sociotechnical Imaginary of Nationalist High Modernism and Its Pragmatic Rationality in Electricity Planning in Taiwan

Book Sheila Jasanoff; Sang-Hyun Kim; (2015)
Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power

Article Renee Shelby; (2023)
Technology, Sexual Violence, and Power-Evasive Politics: Mapping the Anti-violence Sociotechnical Imaginary

Article Neelke Doorn; Behnam Taebi; (May 2018)
Rawls’s Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Method for Engaged Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Potentials and Limitations for the Context of Technological Risks

Article Astrid Mager; (April 2017)
Search engine imaginary: Visions and values in the co-production of search technology and Europe

Article Jessica M. Smith; Abraham S.D. Tidwell; (June 2016)
The everyday lives of energy transitions: Contested sociotechnical imaginaries in the American West

Article Miao Lu; Jack Linchuan Qiu; (2023)
Transfer or Translation? Rethinking Traveling Technologies from the Global South

Article Markku Lehtonen; (2023)
Brand New or More of the Same Nuclear? (De)Constructing the Economic Promise of the European Pressurised Reactor in France and the UK

Article James Chike Nwankwo; (February-June 2022)
Analysis of Impact of Industry 4.0 on Africa, Eastern Europe and US: A Case Study of Cyber-Security and Sociopolitical Dynamics of Nigeria, Russia and USA

Article Leslie, Stuart W.; Kargon, Robert; Kargon, Robert Hugh; (2006)
Exporting MIT: Science, Technology, and Nation-Building in India and Iran

Book D'Andrea, Luciano; (2009)
Handbook on the socialisation of scientific and technological research: A tool for promoting science and technology socialisation policies addressed to policy makers, research and innovation actors and stakeholders

Book Sébastien Lechevalier; (2019)
Innovation beyond technology : Science for society and interdisciplinary approaches

Book Davids, C. A.; (2013)
Religion, Technology, and the Great and Little Divergences: China and Europe Compared, c. 700--1800

Article Carlson, W. Bernard; (2007)
Diversity and Progress: How Might We Picture Technology across Global Cultures?

Book Kingery, W. D.; (1991)
Japanese/American technological innovation: The influence of cultural differences on Japanese and American innovation in advanced materials: Proceedings of the Symposium on Japanese/American Technological Innovation held December 1990 at the University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Article Molella, Arthur P.; (2007)
In This Issue: Editor's Introduction to Special Issue -- Cultures of Innovation

Article Clarissa Ai Ling Lee; (2019)
Nuclear science and technology in the Malaysian context: Three phases of technoscientific knowledge transfer (ETTLG)

Book Mikael Hård; (2023)
Microhistories of Technology: Making the World

Authors & Contributors
Carlson, W. Bernard
Davids, C. A.
Hård, Mikael
Jasanoff, Sheila
Kargon, Robert H.
Kim, Sang-Hyun
Journals
Social Studies of Science
Science, Technology, and Human Values
Comparative Technology Transfer and Society
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
Osiris: A Research Journal Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences
Publishers
Brill
Elsevier
Springer
University of Chicago Press
Springer Nature
River Press Group
Concepts
Science and technology studies (STS)
Technological innovation
Diffusion of innovation; diffusion of knowledge; diffusion of technology
Technology transfer
Imaginaries
Sociotechnical systems
People
Rawls, John
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
Ancient
Medieval
Early modern
Places
Europe
United States
India
Iran
Taiwan
China
Institutions
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT
Google
Lemelson Center for the Study of Invention and Innovation
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment