This work is a critical consideration of several arguments recently given by Elliott Sober that are aimed at undermining the Laplacean stance on probability in evolutionary theory (and, by extension, the special sciences more broadly). The Laplacean contends that the only objective probability an event has is the one assigned to it by a complete description of the relevant microparticles. Sober alleges a formal demonstration that the Laplacean stance on probability in evolutionary theory is inconsistent. But Sober’s argument contains a crucial lacuna, one that likely cannot be repaired to yield the conclusion that Sober draws. He also argues that the Laplacean is committed to inferring semantic facts about probabilities from pragmatic facts about agents’ reasons for using probabilities. But Sober’s arguments against inferring semantic facts from pragmatic constraints would only undermine one basis for Laplaceanism. The Laplacean who formulates her position carefully need not leave herself vulnerable to Sober’s objection to inferring semantics from pragmatics.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Hunter, Cornelius;
(2014)
Darwin's Principle: The Use of Contrastive Reasoning in the Confirmation of Evolution
(/isis/citation/CBB001421706/)
Article
José Díez;
Pablo Lorenzano;
(2015)
Are natural selection explanatory models a priori?
(/isis/citation/CBB225246599/)
Article
Casey Helgeson;
(2016)
Modus Darwin Reconsidered
(/isis/citation/CBB763277191/)
Article
Pierrick Bourrat;
(2020)
Natural selection and the reference grain problem
(/isis/citation/CBB530242611/)
Article
Razeto-Barry, Pablo;
Frick, Ramiro;
(2011)
Probabilistic Causation and the Explanatory Role of Natural Selection
(/isis/citation/CBB001024019/)
Book
Gintis, Herbert;
(2009)
The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB001201375/)
Thesis
Pritchard, Christopher Bryn;
(2005)
The Normal Curve of Evolutionary Biology, 1869--1877, with Special Referenceto the Support Given to Francis Galton by George Darwin
(/isis/citation/CBB001561898/)
Article
Margaret Kolb;
(2019)
In Search of Lost Causes: Walter Scott and Adolphe Quetelet's Revolutions
(/isis/citation/CBB901407421/)
Book
Fischer, Hans;
(2010)
A History of the Central Limit Theorem: From Classical to Modern Probability Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB001251207/)
Article
Durand-Richard, Marie-José;
(2012)
La réception de la théorie des probabilités de Laplace chez les algébristes anglais (1812--1854)
(/isis/citation/CBB001212114/)
Article
Courgeau, Daniel;
(2010)
Dispersion of Measurements in Demography
(/isis/citation/CBB001021435/)
Article
Mazliak, Laurent;
(2012)
Introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB001212108/)
Book
Hahn, Roger;
(2013)
Correspondance de Pierre Simon Laplace (1749--1827)
(/isis/citation/CBB001211954/)
Article
Martin, Thierry;
(2012)
La réception philosophique de l'œuvre probabiliste de Laplace dans la France du premier XIXe siècle
(/isis/citation/CBB001212111/)
Article
Wang, You-jun;
(2009)
On the Study of the Development of Laplace's Early Thought on Probability
(/isis/citation/CBB000952305/)
Chapter
Schneider, Ivo;
(1999)
Stochastik von Laplace bis Poincaré
(/isis/citation/CBB000450073/)
Article
Xu, Chuansheng;
Qu, Anjing;
(2006)
A Study on Pierre Simon de Laplace's Théorie Analytiques des Probabilitiés
(/isis/citation/CBB001020782/)
Chapter
Zabell, Sandy;
(2009)
Philosophy of Inductive Logic: The Bayesian Perspective
(/isis/citation/CBB001210356/)
Article
Zabell, S. L.;
(2012)
De Morgan and Laplace: A Tale of Two Cities
(/isis/citation/CBB001212113/)
Article
Bru, Marie-France;
Bru, Bernard;
Eid, Salah;
(2012)
Une introduction analytique à la Théorie analytique. Hermann Laurent (1873)
(/isis/citation/CBB001212109/)
Be the first to comment!