IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB631370808

What’s All the Fuss About? The Inheritance of Acquired Traits Is Compatible with the Central Dogma (2020)

Camacho, M. Polo (Author)

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Volume: 42
Issue: 3
Pages: 32

URI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-020-00329-8

DOI: 10.1007/s40656-020-00329-8

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Philosophy of biology Biology Pluralism (philosophy) Epigenetics DNA; RNA Molecular biology 21st century

The Central Dogma of molecular biology, which holds that DNA makes protein and not the other way around, is as influential as it is controversial. Some believe the Dogma has outlived its usefulness, either because it fails to fully capture the ins-and-outs of protein synthesis (Griffiths and Stotz in Genetics and philosophy Cambridge introductions to philosophy and biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013; Stotz in Hist Philos Life Sci 28(4):533–548, 2006), because it turns on a confused notion of information (Sarkar in Molecular models of life, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004), or because it problematically assumes the unidirectional flow of information from DNA to protein (Gottlieb, in: Oyama, Griffiths, Gray (eds), Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001). This paper evaluates an underexplored defense of the Dogma, which relies on the assumption that the Dogma and the Inheritance of Acquired Traits, a principle which dates as far back as Jean Baptiste-Lamarck, are incompatible principles (Smith in The theory of evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993; Judson in The eighth day of creation, Jonathan Cape, London, 1979; Dawkins in The extended phenotype, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1970; Cobb in PLoS Biol 15(9):e2003243, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003243; Wilkins in BioEssays 24(10):960–973, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.10167; Graur The fallacious commingling of two unrelated hypotheses: ‘the central dogma’ and ‘dna makes rna makes protein’. Judge Starling., 2018. http://judgestarling.tumblr.com/post/177554581856/the-fallacious-commingling-of-two-unrelated). By appealing to empirical evidence in molecular science, I argue that this apparent incompatibility is indeed merely apparent. I conclude by briefly demonstrating how these considerations bear on the topic of conceptual pluralism in the philosophy of science (Stencel and Proszewska in Found Sci 23(4):603–620, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-017-9543-x; Lu and Bourrat in Br J Philos Sci 69(3):775–800, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx019).

...More

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB631370808/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article F. Boem; E. Ratti; M. Andreoletti; G. Boniolo; (2016)
Why genes are like lemons (/isis/citation/CBB006967276/)

Book Michel Morange; (2020)
The Black Box of Biology: A History of the Molecular Revolution (/isis/citation/CBB035364586/)

Book Ben Martynoga; (2018)
Molecular Tinkering: The Edinburgh Scientists Who Changed the Face of Modern Biology (/isis/citation/CBB777108676/)

Article Bueno, Otávio; (2011)
When Physics and Biology Meet: The Nanoscale Case (/isis/citation/CBB001024003/)

Article Alexander von Schwerin; (2015)
Shaping Vulnerable Bodies at the Thin Boundary between Environment and Organism: Skin, DNA Repair, and a Genealogy of DNA Care Strategies (/isis/citation/CBB878598043/)

Book Bernardino Fantini; Fabrizio Rufo; (2017)
Il codice della vita. Una storia della genetica tra scienza e bioetica (/isis/citation/CBB297801530/)

Book Olby, Robert; (2009)
Francis Crick: Hunter of Life's Secrets (/isis/citation/CBB001021210/)

Thesis Valerie Racine; (2016)
Beyond Reductionism and Emergence: A Study of the Epistemic Practices in Gene Expression Research (/isis/citation/CBB978842577/)

Article Ute Deichmann; (2016)
Why epigenetics is not a vindication of Lamarckism – and why that matters (/isis/citation/CBB175338819/)

Article Luca Chiapperino; Francesco Panese; (2021)
On the traces of the biosocial: Historicizing “plasticity” in contemporary epigenetics (/isis/citation/CBB820144208/)

Article Luca Chiapperino; Francesco Panese; (2017)
La metafora assoluta della “plasticità” tra i secoli XIX e XX: un’indagine sulle tracce del biosociale in epigenetica (/isis/citation/CBB244157938/)

Article Antonine Nicoglou; Charles T. Wolfe; (2018)
Introduction: Sketches of a Conceptual History of Epigenesis (/isis/citation/CBB013586652/)

Article Brigandt, Ingo; (2013)
Explanation in Biology: Reduction, Pluralism, and Explanatory Aims (/isis/citation/CBB001252313/)

Article Stijn Conix; (2019)
Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications (/isis/citation/CBB345206372/)

Chapter Jablonka, Eva; (2011)
Cellular Epigenetic Inheritance in the Twenty-First Century (/isis/citation/CBB001500099/)

Book Hallam Stevens; Sarah S. Richardson; (2015)
Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome (/isis/citation/CBB862623870/)

Article Antonine Nicoglou; Francesca Merlin; (2017)
Epigenetics: A way to bridge the gap between biological fields (/isis/citation/CBB128944502/)

Book Martins, Lilian A.-C. Pereira; Regner, Anna Carolina K. P.; Lorenzano, Pablo; (2006)
Ciências da Vida: Estudos Filosóficos e Históricos (/isis/citation/CBB000820180/)

Article Brenner, Sydney; (2012)
The Revolution in the Life Sciences (/isis/citation/CBB001320451/)

Article Wagner, Andreas; (2012)
The Role of Randomness in Darwinian Evolution (/isis/citation/CBB001210577/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}