Article ID: CBB631370808

What’s All the Fuss About? The Inheritance of Acquired Traits Is Compatible with the Central Dogma (2020)

unapi

The Central Dogma of molecular biology, which holds that DNA makes protein and not the other way around, is as influential as it is controversial. Some believe the Dogma has outlived its usefulness, either because it fails to fully capture the ins-and-outs of protein synthesis (Griffiths and Stotz in Genetics and philosophy Cambridge introductions to philosophy and biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013; Stotz in Hist Philos Life Sci 28(4):533–548, 2006), because it turns on a confused notion of information (Sarkar in Molecular models of life, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004), or because it problematically assumes the unidirectional flow of information from DNA to protein (Gottlieb, in: Oyama, Griffiths, Gray (eds), Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001). This paper evaluates an underexplored defense of the Dogma, which relies on the assumption that the Dogma and the Inheritance of Acquired Traits, a principle which dates as far back as Jean Baptiste-Lamarck, are incompatible principles (Smith in The theory of evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993; Judson in The eighth day of creation, Jonathan Cape, London, 1979; Dawkins in The extended phenotype, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1970; Cobb in PLoS Biol 15(9):e2003243, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003243; Wilkins in BioEssays 24(10):960–973, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.10167; Graur The fallacious commingling of two unrelated hypotheses: ‘the central dogma’ and ‘dna makes rna makes protein’. Judge Starling., 2018. http://judgestarling.tumblr.com/post/177554581856/the-fallacious-commingling-of-two-unrelated). By appealing to empirical evidence in molecular science, I argue that this apparent incompatibility is indeed merely apparent. I conclude by briefly demonstrating how these considerations bear on the topic of conceptual pluralism in the philosophy of science (Stencel and Proszewska in Found Sci 23(4):603–620, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-017-9543-x; Lu and Bourrat in Br J Philos Sci 69(3):775–800, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx019).

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB631370808/

Similar Citations

Article F. Boem; E. Ratti; M. Andreoletti; G. Boniolo; (2016)
Why genes are like lemons

Book Michel Morange; (2020)
The Black Box of Biology: A History of the Molecular Revolution

Book Ben Martynoga; (2018)
Molecular Tinkering: The Edinburgh Scientists Who Changed the Face of Modern Biology

Article Bueno, Otávio; (2011)
When Physics and Biology Meet: The Nanoscale Case

Article Alexander von Schwerin; (2015)
Shaping Vulnerable Bodies at the Thin Boundary between Environment and Organism: Skin, DNA Repair, and a Genealogy of DNA Care Strategies

Book Bernardino Fantini; Fabrizio Rufo; (2017)
Il codice della vita. Una storia della genetica tra scienza e bioetica

Book Olby, Robert; (2009)
Francis Crick: Hunter of Life's Secrets

Thesis Valerie Racine; (2016)
Beyond Reductionism and Emergence: A Study of the Epistemic Practices in Gene Expression Research

Article Ute Deichmann; (2016)
Why epigenetics is not a vindication of Lamarckism – and why that matters

Article Luca Chiapperino; Francesco Panese; (2021)
On the traces of the biosocial: Historicizing “plasticity” in contemporary epigenetics

Article Luca Chiapperino; Francesco Panese; (2017)
La metafora assoluta della “plasticità” tra i secoli XIX e XX: un’indagine sulle tracce del biosociale in epigenetica

Article Antonine Nicoglou; Charles T. Wolfe; (2018)
Introduction: Sketches of a Conceptual History of Epigenesis

Article Brigandt, Ingo; (2013)
Explanation in Biology: Reduction, Pluralism, and Explanatory Aims

Article Stijn Conix; (2019)
Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications

Chapter Jablonka, Eva; (2011)
Cellular Epigenetic Inheritance in the Twenty-First Century

Book Hallam Stevens; Sarah S. Richardson; (2015)
Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome

Article Antonine Nicoglou; Francesca Merlin; (2017)
Epigenetics: A way to bridge the gap between biological fields

Book Martins, Lilian A.-C. Pereira; Regner, Anna Carolina K. P.; Lorenzano, Pablo; (2006)
Ciências da Vida: Estudos Filosóficos e Históricos

Article Brenner, Sydney; (2012)
The Revolution in the Life Sciences

Article Wagner, Andreas; (2012)
The Role of Randomness in Darwinian Evolution

Authors & Contributors
Panese, Francesco
Nicoglou, Antonine
Chiapperino, Luca
Boniolo, Giovanni
Brenner, Sydney
Brigandt, Ingo
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
History of Science
Philosophy of Science
Science
Science and Education
Publishers
Associação de Filosofia e História da Ciência do Cone Sul
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Donzelli
Duke University Press
Harvard University Press
Arizona State University
Concepts
Biology
Philosophy of biology
Molecular biology
DNA; RNA
Epigenetics
Genetics
People
Crick, Francis
Helmont, Jan Baptista van
Kuhn, Thomas S.
Waddington, Conrad Hal
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
19th century
20th century, late
Places
Brazil
Argentina
Edinburgh (Scotland)
Institutions
Human Genome Project
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment