Article ID: CBB631370808

What’s All the Fuss About? The Inheritance of Acquired Traits Is Compatible with the Central Dogma (2020)

unapi

The Central Dogma of molecular biology, which holds that DNA makes protein and not the other way around, is as influential as it is controversial. Some believe the Dogma has outlived its usefulness, either because it fails to fully capture the ins-and-outs of protein synthesis (Griffiths and Stotz in Genetics and philosophy Cambridge introductions to philosophy and biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013; Stotz in Hist Philos Life Sci 28(4):533–548, 2006), because it turns on a confused notion of information (Sarkar in Molecular models of life, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004), or because it problematically assumes the unidirectional flow of information from DNA to protein (Gottlieb, in: Oyama, Griffiths, Gray (eds), Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001). This paper evaluates an underexplored defense of the Dogma, which relies on the assumption that the Dogma and the Inheritance of Acquired Traits, a principle which dates as far back as Jean Baptiste-Lamarck, are incompatible principles (Smith in The theory of evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993; Judson in The eighth day of creation, Jonathan Cape, London, 1979; Dawkins in The extended phenotype, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1970; Cobb in PLoS Biol 15(9):e2003243, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003243; Wilkins in BioEssays 24(10):960–973, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.10167; Graur The fallacious commingling of two unrelated hypotheses: ‘the central dogma’ and ‘dna makes rna makes protein’. Judge Starling., 2018. http://judgestarling.tumblr.com/post/177554581856/the-fallacious-commingling-of-two-unrelated). By appealing to empirical evidence in molecular science, I argue that this apparent incompatibility is indeed merely apparent. I conclude by briefly demonstrating how these considerations bear on the topic of conceptual pluralism in the philosophy of science (Stencel and Proszewska in Found Sci 23(4):603–620, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-017-9543-x; Lu and Bourrat in Br J Philos Sci 69(3):775–800, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx019).

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB631370808/

Similar Citations

Article F. Boem; E. Ratti; M. Andreoletti; G. Boniolo; (2016)
Why genes are like lemons (/isis/citation/CBB006967276/)

Book Michel Morange; (2020)
The Black Box of Biology: A History of the Molecular Revolution (/isis/citation/CBB035364586/)

Book Bernardino Fantini; Fabrizio Rufo; (2017)
Il codice della vita. Una storia della genetica tra scienza e bioetica (/isis/citation/CBB297801530/)

Article Bueno, Otávio; (2011)
When Physics and Biology Meet: The Nanoscale Case (/isis/citation/CBB001024003/)

Book Olby, Robert; (2009)
Francis Crick: Hunter of Life's Secrets (/isis/citation/CBB001021210/)

Book Ben Martynoga; (2018)
Molecular Tinkering: The Edinburgh Scientists Who Changed the Face of Modern Biology (/isis/citation/CBB777108676/)

Article Antonine Nicoglou; Charles T. Wolfe; (2018)
Introduction: Sketches of a Conceptual History of Epigenesis (/isis/citation/CBB013586652/)

Article Stijn Conix; (2019)
Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications (/isis/citation/CBB345206372/)

Chapter Jablonka, Eva; (2011)
Cellular Epigenetic Inheritance in the Twenty-First Century (/isis/citation/CBB001500099/)

Article Ute Deichmann; (2016)
Why epigenetics is not a vindication of Lamarckism – and why that matters (/isis/citation/CBB175338819/)

Article Luca Chiapperino; Francesco Panese; (2021)
On the traces of the biosocial: Historicizing “plasticity” in contemporary epigenetics (/isis/citation/CBB820144208/)

Article Brigandt, Ingo; (2013)
Explanation in Biology: Reduction, Pluralism, and Explanatory Aims (/isis/citation/CBB001252313/)

Book Hallam Stevens; Sarah S. Richardson; (2015)
Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome (/isis/citation/CBB862623870/)

Article Antonine Nicoglou; Francesca Merlin; (2017)
Epigenetics: A way to bridge the gap between biological fields (/isis/citation/CBB128944502/)

Article Brenner, Sydney; (2012)
The Revolution in the Life Sciences (/isis/citation/CBB001320451/)

Book Martins, Lilian A.-C. Pereira; Regner, Anna Carolina K. P.; Lorenzano, Pablo; (2006)
Ciências da Vida: Estudos Filosóficos e Históricos (/isis/citation/CBB000820180/)

Article Wagner, Andreas; (2012)
The Role of Randomness in Darwinian Evolution (/isis/citation/CBB001210577/)

Authors & Contributors
Chiapperino, Luca
Nicoglou, Antonine
Panese, Francesco
Fabrizio Rufo
Boem, Federico
Martynoga, Ben
Concepts
Biology
Philosophy of biology
Epigenetics
DNA; RNA
Molecular biology
Genetics
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
20th century, late
19th century
Places
Edinburgh
Argentina
Brazil
Institutions
Human Genome Project
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment