Fein, Julia (Author)
Responding to the Soviet state’s call to expand export for currency during the First Five-Year Plan (1928–32), Siberian scientific personnel—pointing to Siberia’s importance in the history of global science and exploration—created and promoted a new category of commodity, calling it “scientific” or “museum crude.” These uniform sets of objects of the natural and human sciences of Siberia represented a departure from existing international specimen trade in that the expeditions to extract scientific/museum crude relied on institutions and techniques of state socialism. In this vision, scientific goods became a nationalized resource subject to state planning and capitalization. However, once collected, these commodities came up against characteristically Soviet/Stalinist barriers: after being trumpeted as a contribution to Soviet trade, most of these collections were stopped at the border because of a shift in Soviet political culture. Instead of contributing profits to Soviet international trade, therefore, scientific crude’s accumulation in Moscow and Leningrad functioned as a way of requisitioning value from the periphery to the center, not unlike state treatment of other resources. Suggesting that scientific/museum crude represents the ultimate logic of capitalism as applied to the scientific spheres, this essay argues that state socialism itself created the institutional spaces that fostered and then shut down this extreme iteration of capitalism-science entanglement.
...MoreArticle Lukas Rieppel; Eugenia Lean; William Deringer (2018) Introduction: The Entangled Histories of Science and Capitalism. Osiris: A Research Journal Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences (pp. 1-24).
Article
Courtney Fullilove;
(2018)
Microbiology and the Imperatives of Capital in International Agro-Biodiversity Preservation
Book
Barshay, Andrew E.;
(2004)
Social Sciences in Modern Japan: The Marxian and Modernist Traditions
Article
Werskey, Gary;
(2007)
The Marxist Critique of Capitalist Science: A History in Three Movements?
Article
Pilar Piqué;
(2021)
Ernst Cassirer’s Philosophy of Culture: An Economic Assessment of Scope and Limitations
Article
Katja Bruisch;
(2020)
Nature Mistaken: Resource-Making, Emotions and the Transformation of Peatlands in the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union
Article
Ayako Sakurai;
(2024)
Listing Butterflies: Economic and Epistemic Logistics of Commodification, 1880s–1910s
Book
Rebecca E. Karl;
(2017)
The Magic of Concepts: History and the Economic in Twentieth-Century China
Article
Arunabh Ghosh;
(2018)
Lies, Damned Lies, and (Bourgeois) Statistics: Ascertaining Social Fact in Midcentury China and the Soviet Union
Article
Stéphane Guy;
(2019)
From Industrial Change to Historical Inevitability: Annie Besant’s Socialism and the Philosophies of History
Book
Angelo Calemme;
(2022)
Dalla Rivoluzione scientifica alla Rivoluzione industriale: Sulle condizioni marxiane dello sviluppo scientifico-tecnico
Essay Review
Weldon, Stephen P.;
(2014)
Monkey Business
Book
Greenberg, Daniel S.;
(2007)
Science for Sale: The Perils, Rewards, and Delusions of Campus Capitalism
Article
Oreskes, Naomi;
(2010)
Science, Technology and Free Enterprise
Thesis
Wendling, Amy E.;
(2006)
On Alienation and Machine Production: Capitalist Embodiment in Karl Marx
Article
Diana Kurkovsky West;
(2020)
Cybernetics for the Command Economy: Foregrounding Entropy in Late Soviet Planning
Book
Martha Lampland;
(2016)
The Value of Labor: The Science of Commodification in Hungary, 1920-1956
Article
Fein, Julia;
(2013)
Talking Rocks in the Irkutsk Museum: Networks of Science in Late Imperial Siberia
Article
Isaenko, Oleksandr;
(2013)
Role of the Engineer I. H. Aleksandrov in the Use of Power Resources of the Angara River (30-ies of the XX Century)
Book
Thurtle, Phillip;
(2007)
Emergence of Genetic Rationality: Space, Time, and Information in American Biological Science, 1870--1920
Article
Garland E. Allen;
(2017)
Mendelism and the Promise of A New Agriculture, 1900-1945
Be the first to comment!