IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB625286946

Kant’s Epigenesis: Specificity and Developmental Constraints (2017)

Demarest, Boris (Author)

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Volume: 39
Issue: 1
Pages: 3

URI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-017-0129-2

DOI: 10.1007/s40656-017-0129-2

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

In this paper, I argue that Kant adopted, throughout his career, a position that is much more akin to classical accounts of epigenesis, although he does reject the more radical forms of epigenesis proposed in his own time, and does make use of preformationist sounding terms. I argue that this is because Kant (1) thinks of what is pre-formed as a species, not an individual or a part of an individual; (2) has no qualm with the idea of a specific, teleological principle or force underlying generation, and conceives of germs and predispositions as specific constraints on such a principle or force. Neither of these conceptions of what is “preformed”, I argue, is in strict opposition to classical epigenesis. I further suggest that Kant’s lingering use of preformationist terminology is due to (1) his belief that this is required to account for the specificity of the specific generative force; (2) his resistance towards the unrestricted plasticity of the generative force in radical epigenesis, which violates species-fixism; and (3) his insistence on the internal, organic basis of developmental plasticity and variation within species. I conclude by suggesting that this terminological and interpretative peculiarity is partly due to a larger shift in the natural philosophical concerns surrounding the debate on epigenesis and preformation. Specifically, it is a sign that the original reasons for resisting epigenesis, namely its use of specific, teleological principles and its commitment to the natural production of biological structure, became less of a concern, whereas unrestricted plasticity and its undermining of fixism became a real issue, thereby also becoming the focal point of the debate.

...More

Citation URI

http://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB625286946/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article John H. Zammito; (2016)
Epigenesis in Kant: Recent Reconsiderations (/isis/citation/CBB404962128/)

Article Cohen, Alix A.; (2006)
Kant on Epigenesis, Monogenesis and Human Nature: The Biological Premises of Anthropology (/isis/citation/CBB000770747/)

Article Ingensiep, Hans Werner; (2006)
Organism, Epigenesis, and Life in Kant's Thinking---Biophilosophy between Transcendental Philosophy, Intuitive Analogy, and Empirical Ontology (/isis/citation/CBB000933665/)

Article Zammito, John H.; (2003)
“This Inscrutable Principle of an Original Organization”: Epigenesis and “Looseness of Fit” in Kant's Philosophy of Science (/isis/citation/CBB000340872/)

Chapter Zammito, John; (2006)
Kant's Early Views on Epigenesis: The Role of Maupertuis (/isis/citation/CBB000771983/)

Article Moya, Eugenio; (2005)
Epigénesis y validez: El papel de la embriología en el programa transcendental de Kant (/isis/citation/CBB000933618/)

Book Mensch, Jennifer; (2013)
Kant's Organicism: Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy (/isis/citation/CBB001213143/)

Article Antonine Nicoglou; (2018)
Waddington’s Epigenetics or the Pictorial Meetings of Development and Genetics (/isis/citation/CBB557999585/)

Book Robert, Jason Scott; (2004)
Embryology, Epigenesis, and Evolution: Taking Development Seriously (/isis/citation/CBB000770170/)

Book Wellmann, Janina; (2010)
Die Form des Werdens: Eine Kulturgeschichte der Embryologie, 1760--1830 (/isis/citation/CBB001023211/)

Article Porter, Charlotte M.; (1987)
Benjamin Henry Latrobe and the nomenclature of two North American fishes (/isis/citation/CBB000041356/)

Chapter Detlefsen, Karen; (2006)
Explanation and Demonstration in the Haller-Wolff Debate (/isis/citation/CBB000771980/)

Article Witt, Elke; (2008)
Form---A Matter of Generation: The Relation of Generation, Form, and Function in the Epigenetic Theory of Caspar F. Wolff (/isis/citation/CBB000831765/)

Article Bednarczyk, A.; (2005)
Caspar Friedrich Wolff (1734--1794): The Concept of Epigenesis and the Problem of Spontaneous Generation (/isis/citation/CBB000931621/)

Article Angela Ferraro; (2016)
Theorizing epigenesis in a time of preexistence: From the end of the seventeenth century to the 1720s (/isis/citation/CBB513490570/)

Article Monti, Maria Teresa; (2000)
Epigenesis of the Monstrous Form and Preformistic “Genetics” (Lémery - Winslow - Haller) (/isis/citation/CBB000111620/)

Article Marc J. Ratcliff; (2017)
De la règle de l’exception au principe de Bonnet: les principes épistémologiques des sciences de la vie à partir de 1740 (/isis/citation/CBB288202564/)

Book Breidbach, Olaf; (2006)
Goethes Metamorphosenlehre (/isis/citation/CBB000830052/)

Article Fareld, Victoria; (2006)
Wilhelm von Humboldts frihet som epigenetisk bildning (/isis/citation/CBB001220357/)

Article Wellmann, Janina; (2008)
Die Metamorphose der Bilder: Die Verwandlung der Insekten und ihre Darstellung vom Ende des 17. bis zum Anfang des 19. Jahrhunderts (/isis/citation/CBB000930727/)