Article ID: CBB625249269

A "Corruption of British Science?": The Strategic Defense Initiative and British Technology Policy (July 2021)

unapi

This article shows that the competitive economic forces unleashed by globalization produced new technological choices for policymakers in Britain and throughout the developed world, which increasingly pitted Cold War security rationales against commercial opportunities. Those choices reveal a tension between core tenets of Thatcherism: alignment with U.S. foreign policy objectives and support for corporate interests. Britain's response to the U.S. 1983 Strategic Defense Initiative intensified ideological competition within the ruling Conservative Party about aligning with the United States or the European Union. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher endorsed British participation in the Strategic Defense Initiative because of supposed national security benefits, promises of economic gains, and suspicion of Britain's further integration in the European common market. This policy failed, as cabinet officials, parliamentarians, researchers, and corporations pursued alternative European arrangements for stimulating technological innovation that did not carry restrictions on intellectual property or limits on the value of research contracts.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB625249269/

Similar Citations

Article Grattan-Guinness, Ivor; (2009)
Bertrand Russell (1872--1970), Man of Dissent (/isis/citation/CBB001022694/)

Thesis Bridger, Sarah; (2011)
Scientists and the Ethics of Cold War Weapons Research (/isis/citation/CBB001567285/)

Book Herken, Gregg; (2000)
Cardinal Choices: Presidential Science Advising from the Atomic Bomb to SDI (/isis/citation/CBB000111830/)

Book Brian E. Crim; (2018)
Our Germans: Project Paperclip and the National Security State (/isis/citation/CBB389750546/)

Article Gross, Rachel S.; (April 2019)
Layering for a Cold War: The M-1943 Combat System, Military Testing, and Clothing as Technology (/isis/citation/CBB312384599/)

Book Bridger, Sarah; (2015)
Scientists at War: The Ethics of Cold War Weapons Research (/isis/citation/CBB001551957/)

Book Peden, G. C.; (2007)
Arms, Economics and British Strategy: From Dreadnoughts to Hydrogen Bombs (/isis/citation/CBB001230636/)

Book Bud, Robert; Gummett, Philip; (1999)
Cold War, Hot Science: Applied Research in Britain's Defense Laboratories 1945--1990 (/isis/citation/CBB000112014/)

Article Colin A. Hempstead; (2008)
Infrared Missiles, Some Young Scientists and a New Technology (/isis/citation/CBB305296955/)

Book Glanfield, John; (2001)
The Devil's Chariots: The Birth and Secret Battles of the First Tanks (/isis/citation/CBB000100068/)

Book Latham, Colin; Stobbs, Anne; (1999)
Pioneers of radar (/isis/citation/CBB000110134/)

Book Rojecki, Andrew; (1999)
Silencing the Opposition: Antinuclear Movements and the Media in the Cold War (/isis/citation/CBB000112097/)

Chapter Porter, Dorothy; (2007)
Charles Babbage and George Birkbeck: Science, Reform and Radicalism (/isis/citation/CBB000773387/)

Article Heiman, Gadi; (2010)
Diverging Goals: The French and Israeli Pursuit of the Bomb, 1958--1962 (/isis/citation/CBB001030999/)

Authors & Contributors
Bridger, Sarah
Gross, Rachel S.
Crim, Brian E.
Weiner, Sharon K.
Vizgin, Vladimir P.
Stobbs, Anne
Concepts
Military technology
Technology
Nuclear weapons; atomic weapons
Science and war; science and the military
Cold War
Political activists and activism
Time Periods
20th century
20th century, late
19th century
21st century
Places
Great Britain
United States
Soviet Union
Russia
Germany
France
Institutions
Strategic Defense Initiative
Operation Paperclip
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament
United States. Army
Great Britain. Defence Evaluation Research Agency
United States Navy
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment