Craver, Carl F. (Author)
Kaplan, David M. (Author)
Completeness is an important but misunderstood norm of explanation. It has recently been argued that mechanistic accounts of scientific explanation are committed to the thesis that models are complete only if they describe everything about a mechanism and, as a corollary, that incomplete models are always improved by adding more details. If so, mechanistic accounts are at odds with the obvious and important role of abstraction in scientific modelling. We respond to this characterization of the mechanist’s views about abstraction and articulate norms of completeness for mechanistic explanations that have no such unwanted implications. 1 Introduction2 A Balancing Act: When Do Details Matter?3 The Norms of Causal Explanation4 The Norms of Constitutive Explanation5 Salmon-Completeness6 From More Details to More Relevant Details7 Non-explanatory Virtues of Abstraction8 From Explanatory Models to Explanatory Knowledge9 Mechanistic Completeness Reconsidered10 Conclusion
...More
Article
Claudia Cristalli;
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen;
(2021)
Abstraction and Generalization in the Logic of Science: Cases from Nineteenth-Century Scientific Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB855367059/)
Article
Glennan, Stuart;
(2005)
Modeling Mechanisms
(/isis/citation/CBB000770698/)
Book
Pierre-Alain Braillard;
Christophe Malaterre;
(2015)
Explanation in Biology: An Enquiry into the Diversity of Explanatory Patterns in the Life Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB328513685/)
Article
Karina Alleva;
José Díez;
Lucia Federico;
(2017)
Models, theory structure and mechanisms in biochemistry: The case of allosterism
(/isis/citation/CBB541545262/)
Book
Stuart Glennan;
(2017)
The New Mechanical Philosophy
(/isis/citation/CBB462575570/)
Article
Bechtel, William;
Abrahamsen, Adele;
(2005)
Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative
(/isis/citation/CBB000770697/)
Article
Daniel C. Burnston;
(2016)
Data graphs and mechanistic explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB555220713/)
Article
Pyle, Andrew;
(2002)
Boyle on Science and the Mechanical Philosophy: A Reply to Chalmers
(/isis/citation/CBB000201214/)
Article
McManus, Fabrizzio;
(2012)
Development and Mechanistic Explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB001221636/)
Article
Anstey, Peter R.;
(2002)
Robert Boyle and the Heuristic Value of Mechanism
(/isis/citation/CBB000201213/)
Article
Chalmers, Alan;
(2002)
Experiment versus mechanical philosophy in the work of Robert Boyle: A reply to Anstey and Pyle
(/isis/citation/CBB000201215/)
Article
Remington J. Moll;
Daniel Steel;
Robert A. Montgomery;
(2016)
AIC and the challenge of complexity: A case study from ecology
(/isis/citation/CBB078857465/)
Article
Niebergall, Karl-Georg;
(2002)
Structuralism, Model Theory and Reduction
(/isis/citation/CBB000200017/)
Article
(2000)
The Structure of Scientific Theories Thirty Years On
(/isis/citation/CBB000110615/)
Book
Magnani, Lorenzo;
Nersessian, Nancy J.;
(2002)
Model Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values
(/isis/citation/CBB000201255/)
Article
Rune Nyrup;
(2020)
Of Water Drops and Atomic Nuclei: Analogies and Pursuit Worthiness in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB558276725/)
Article
(2000)
Toward a New Understanding of Scientific Success
(/isis/citation/CBB000110609/)
Article
Valérie Racine;
(2016)
The mechanistic-holistic divide revisited: The case of the lac operon
(/isis/citation/CBB565749089/)
Article
Jason Winning;
(2020)
Mechanistic Causation and Constraints: Perspectival Parts and Powers, Non-perspectival Modal Patterns
(/isis/citation/CBB929989718/)
Article
Dominic K. Dimech;
(2017)
Modelling with words: Narrative and natural selection
(/isis/citation/CBB328807036/)
Be the first to comment!