IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB618398697

Misunderstanding Citizen Science: Hermeneutic Ignorance in U.S. Environmental Regulation (2022)

Ottinger, Gwen (Author)

Science as Culture
Volume: 31
Issue: 4
Pages: 504-529

DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2022.2035710

URI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2022.2035710

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Environmental monitoring Risk assessment Petrochemical industry Ignorance (Theory of knowledge) Regulation Citizen science; community science 21st century 20th century, late United States

In the United States, ‘fenceline communities' next to petrochemical facilities have been conducting and advocating for air monitoring since the 1990s, highlighting gaps in U.S. environmental regulators' monitoring programs. Citizen science is imagined to be valuable as a source of data for filling such gaps. But fenceline communities' air monitoring activities also underscore regulators' hermeneutic ignorance, namely their lack of appropriate concepts, categories, and metrics for understanding the temporality of air pollution as experienced by marginalized communities. Citizen science could play a valuable role in addressing hermeneutic ignorance, by providing more adequate epistemic resources for understanding the environmental harms. In the case of community monitoring programs, these have included epistemic resources for understanding the immediacy of air pollution and the chronic nature of unpredictable spikes in pollution. However, regulators confronted with community-led monitoring have acknowledged neither citizen scientists’ contributions to epistemic resources nor their own hermeneutic ignorance, limiting the potential for citizen science to address institutionalized ignorance. Recognizing hermeneutic ignorance shows the important role that epistemic resources play in institutionalizing ignorance, and points to reforms necessary if citizen science is to make robust contributions to environmental protection.

...More

Included in

Article Katharina T. Paul; Samantha Vanderslott; Matthias Gross (2022) Institutionalised ignorance in policy and regulation. Science as Culture (pp. 419-432). unapi

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB618398697/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Book Busch, Akiko; (2013)
The incidental steward: reflections on citizen science (/isis/citation/CBB844467183/)

Article Henri Boullier; Emmanuel Henry; (2022)
Toxic Ignorance: How Regulatory Procedures and Industrial Knowledge Jeopardise the Risk Assessment of Chemicals (/isis/citation/CBB183545703/)

Article R. Ashton Macfarlane; (2024)
The Many Pollutant Identities of Carbon Dioxide: Global Climate Monitoring and Air Pollution Research in New Zealand, 1968–1975 (/isis/citation/CBB170508881/)

Article Christopher Neumaier; (December 2020)
Technological Solutions and Contested Interpretations of Scientific Results: Risk Assessment of Diesel Emissions in the United States and in West Germany, 1977–1995 (/isis/citation/CBB552521359/)

Book Mariel Borowitz; (2024)
Open Space: The Global Effort for Open Access to Environmental Satellite Data (/isis/citation/CBB331556800/)

Article Mei-Fang Fan; (2015)
Evaluating the 2008 Consensus Conference on Genetically Modified Foods in Taiwan (/isis/citation/CBB798880384/)

Article Olga Kuchinskaya; (2019)
Citizen Science and the Politics of Environmental Data (/isis/citation/CBB990120305/)

Article Alina Geampana; (2019)
Risky Technologies: Systemic Uncertainty in Contraceptive Risk Assessment and Management (/isis/citation/CBB376759289/)

Article David Demortain; (2024)
How scientists become experts—or don’t: Social organization of research and engagement in scientific advice in a toxicology laboratory (/isis/citation/CBB039693533/)

Article Leonie Dendler; Gaby-Fleur Böl; (July 2021)
Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science: Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment (/isis/citation/CBB423909656/)

Article Oliver Todt; José Luis Luján; (2022)
Rationality in Context: Regulatory Science and the Best Scientific Method (/isis/citation/CBB425178130/)

Article Julie Guthman; Sandy Brown; (May 2016)
Whose Life Counts: Biopolitics and the “Bright Line” of Chloropicrin Mitigation in California’s Strawberry Industry (/isis/citation/CBB827594313/)

Article Becky Mansfield; (2021)
Deregulatory science: Chemical risk analysis in Trump’s EPA (/isis/citation/CBB234438851/)

Book David Demortain; (2020)
The Science of Bureaucracy: Risk Decision-Making and the US Environmental Protection Agency (/isis/citation/CBB170498113/)

Article Yasushi Sato; (2017)
Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) in Human Spaceflight: Technical, Cultural, Political, and Economic Factors Behind NASA's Stance to Risk (/isis/citation/CBB015960150/)

Article François Dedieu; (2022)
Secrecies as Organized Ignorance: The Illusion of Knowledge in French Pesticide Regulation (/isis/citation/CBB517499623/)

Article Arlen, Gary; (Spring 2010)
Broadband Velocity (/isis/citation/CBB896401008/)

Book Mario Daniels; John Krige; (2022)
Knowledge Regulation and National Security in Postwar America (/isis/citation/CBB238236707/)

Article Arthur Daemmrich; (2019)
Welcoming (Newbie) Scholars to the Field (/isis/citation/CBB904595256/)

Article Sarah Babb; (2021)
The Privatization of Human Research Ethics: An American Story (/isis/citation/CBB733380502/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}