Esselborn, Stefan (Author)
Zachmann, Karin (Author)
The article explores the introduction of Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) for nuclear energy in the two German states, the FRG and the GDR since the late 1960s. We argue that PRA - which promised to make potential dangers associated with the new technology calculable, comparable and seemingly controllable by reducing them to numerical terms - is best understood as an evidence practice, aiming to (re-)establish intersubjective agreement on nuclear safety through quantification. As such, the introduction of PRA was from the beginning also a political question, tied to the destabilization of alternative evidence practices. While in both the FRG and the GDR, the relativization of the promise of absolute safety inherent in the new method proved problematic, this was an even bigger obstacle in the socialist East. Although PRA ultimately failed to (re-)establish a societal consensus on nuclear energy in Germany, its institutionalization shaped the societal discourse on dangerous technologies.
...More
Book
Arwen Mohun;
(2013)
Risk: Negotiating Safety in American Society
(/isis/citation/CBB242291502/)
Book
Thomas Raymond Wellock;
(2021)
Safe enough? A history of nuclear power and accident risk
(/isis/citation/CBB609552152/)
Article
Kuchinskaya, Olga;
(2011)
Articulating the Signs of Danger: Lay Experiences of Post-Chernobyl Radiation Risks and Effects
(/isis/citation/CBB001034665/)
Thesis
Bales, Ellen;
(2009)
An Element of Uncertainty: Radon and the Quantification of Risk in 20th-Century America, 1945--2000
(/isis/citation/CBB001562876/)
Article
Leonie Dendler;
Gaby-Fleur Böl;
(July 2021)
Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science: Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment
(/isis/citation/CBB423909656/)
Article
Kapusta, Joseph I.;
(2008)
Accelerator Disaster Scenarios, the Unabomber, and Scientific Risks
(/isis/citation/CBB000932027/)
Article
Christopher Neumaier;
(December 2020)
Technological Solutions and Contested Interpretations of Scientific Results: Risk Assessment of Diesel Emissions in the United States and in West Germany, 1977–1995
(/isis/citation/CBB552521359/)
Book
Katrin Jordan;
(2018)
Ausgestrahlt: Die mediale Debatte um »Tschernobyl« in der Bundesrepublik und in Frankreich 1986/87
(/isis/citation/CBB815575732/)
Article
Knowles, Scott Gabriel;
(2014)
Engineering Risk and Disaster: A special issue of Engineering Studies
(/isis/citation/CBB001550638/)
Article
Sugiman, Toshio;
(2014)
Lessons Learned from the 2011 Debacle of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant
(/isis/citation/CBB001420061/)
Article
Maria Borovnik;
(December 2017)
Nighttime Navigating Moving a Container Ship through Darkness
(/isis/citation/CBB613573137/)
Article
Andrew Lakoff;
(June 2017)
A fragile assemblage: Mutant bird flu and the limits of risk assessment
(/isis/citation/CBB656375388/)
Thesis
Polu, Sandhya Lakshmi;
(2009)
The Perception of Risk: Policy-Making on Infectious Disease in India (1892--1940)
(/isis/citation/CBB001562846/)
Book
Edward D. Blandford;
Scott Douglas Sagan;
(2016)
Learning from a disaster: Improving nuclear safety and security after Fukushima
(/isis/citation/CBB411219038/)
Article
Fredrik Andersen;
Elena Rocca;
(2020)
Underdetermination and evidence-based policy
(/isis/citation/CBB237961815/)
Article
Thomas R. Wellock;
(July 2017)
A Figure of Merit: Quantifying the Probability of a Nuclear Reactor Accident
(/isis/citation/CBB888014365/)
Article
Fang, Xiang;
(2014)
Local People's Understanding of Risk from Civil Nuclear Power in the Chinese Context
(/isis/citation/CBB001420063/)
Chapter
Hideyuki Hirakawa;
(2015)
Rhetorical Marginalization of Science and Democracy: Politics in Risk Discourse on Radioactive Risks in Japan
(/isis/citation/CBB709908260/)
Book
Thomas Le Roux;
(2016)
Risques industriels: savoirs, régulations, politiques d'assistance, fin XVIIe-début XXe siècle
(/isis/citation/CBB784107233/)
Article
Antonio J. Heras;
Pierre-Charles Pradier;
David Teira;
(2020)
What Was Fair in Actuarial Fairness?
(/isis/citation/CBB253254427/)
Be the first to comment!