Creating Regulatory Harmony: The Participatory Politics of OECD Chemical Testing Standards in the Making (September 2021)
Colleen Lanier-Christensen (Author)
Science, Technology, and Human Values
Volume: 46
Issue: 5
Pages: 925-952
Edition Details: Special Issue: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation
Language: English
In recent decades, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has become a powerful forum for trade liberalization and regulatory harmonization. OECD members have worked to reconcile divergent national regulatory approaches, applying a single framework across sovereign states, in effect determining whose knowledge-making practices would guide regulatory action throughout the industrialized world. Focusing on US regulators, industry associations, and environmental groups, this article explores the participatory politics of OECD chemical regulation harmonization in the late 1970s to early 1980s. These efforts were conditioned by differential institutional access and resources among stakeholders who sought to shape regulatory knowledge rules. Facing competing European and US approaches to chemical data—a minimum “base set” of test data versus case-by-case determinations—OECD members chose the European approach in 1980. However, US regulatory politics shifted with the election of President Reagan, prompting industry associations to lobby the US government to block the agreement. Examining the micropolitics of these standards in the making, I demonstrate that while long-term structures advantaged industrial actors, ideological alignment with the US government precipitated their decisive influence. The case illustrates the importance of attending to the distinctive politics of international harmonization and the effects on transnational knowledge-making and regulatory intervention.
...MoreArticle Emmanuel Henry; Valentin Thomas; Sara Angeli Aguiton; Marc-Olivier Déplaude; Nathalie Jas (September 2021) Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation. Science, Technology, and Human Values (pp. 911-924).
Similar Citations
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
Valentin Thomas;
Sara Angeli Aguiton;
Marc-Olivier Déplaude;
Nathalie Jas;
(September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation
(/isis/citation/CBB736985993/)
Article
Carmen McLeod;
Sarah Hartley;
(July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance
(/isis/citation/CBB564349730/)
Article
Brian Salter;
(January 2022)
Markets, Cultures, and the Politics of Value: The Case of Assisted Reproductive Technology
(/isis/citation/CBB380652953/)
Article
Angela N. H. Creager;
(September 2021)
To Test or Not to Test: Tools, Rules, and Corporate Data in US Chemicals Regulation
(/isis/citation/CBB745420064/)
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
(September 2021)
Governing Occupational Exposure Using Thresholds: A Policy Biased Toward Industry
(/isis/citation/CBB676852860/)
Article
Ashlyn Jaeger;
(2019)
(Re)Producing Cyborgs: Biomedicalizing Abortion through the Congressional Debate over Fetal Pain
(/isis/citation/CBB770211028/)
Article
Cook, Brian R.;
Kesby, Mike;
Fazey, Ioan;
Spray, Chris;
(October 2013)
The persistence of ‘normal’ catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference
(/isis/citation/CBB350967664/)
Article
Sarah Wadmann;
Amalie Martinus Hauge;
(August 2021)
Strategies of stratification: Regulating market access in the era of personalized medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB940730003/)
Article
Tom Özden-Schilling;
(2024)
Trust in numbers: Serious numbers and speculative fictions in rare earth elements exploration
(/isis/citation/CBB923002984/)
Article
Amy Adams Quark;
(2019)
Outsourcing Regulatory Decision-making: “International” Epistemic Communities, Transnational Firms, and Pesticide Residue Standards in India
(/isis/citation/CBB678564374/)
Article
Ruha Benjamin;
(November 2016)
Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-based Bioethics
(/isis/citation/CBB856025239/)
Article
Leonie Dendler;
Gaby-Fleur Böl;
(July 2021)
Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science: Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment
(/isis/citation/CBB423909656/)
Article
Robert G. W. Kirk;
(July 2018)
Recovering The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique: The 3Rs and the Human Essence of Animal Research
(/isis/citation/CBB661013428/)
Article
Hiro Saito;
(January 2021)
The Developmental State and Public Participation: The Case of Energy Policy-making in Post–Fukushima Japan
(/isis/citation/CBB786983437/)
Article
Papadopoulos, Dimitris;
(April 2011)
Alter-ontologies: Towards a constituent politics in technoscience
(/isis/citation/CBB185760393/)
Article
Mattia Andreoletti;
David Teira;
(2019)
Rules versus Standards: What Are the Costs of Epistemic Norms in Drug Regulation?
(/isis/citation/CBB881753075/)
Article
Sampsa Saikkonen;
Esa Väliverronen;
(2022)
The trickle-down of political and economic control: On the organizational suppression of environmental scientists in government science
(/isis/citation/CBB033206075/)
Article
Beth Greenhough;
Emma Roe;
(July 2018)
Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector
(/isis/citation/CBB661318783/)
Article
Henri Boullier;
Emmanuel Henry;
(2022)
Toxic Ignorance: How Regulatory Procedures and Industrial Knowledge Jeopardise the Risk Assessment of Chemicals
(/isis/citation/CBB183545703/)
Article
Christy Spackman;
Gary A. Burlingame;
(June 2018)
Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production
(/isis/citation/CBB215070697/)
Be the first to comment!