IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB603433424

How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L’Aquila Trial (May 2017)

Federico Brandmayr (Author)

Science, Technology and Human Values
Volume: 42
Issue: 3
Pages: 346-380

DOI: 10.1177/0162243916674322

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

This paper contributes to two topics that have received insufficient attention in science and technology studies: the social dimensions of causal reasoning and how the knowledge-making site of expert testimony affects the production and reception of social scientific knowledge. It deals with how social scientists make causal claims when testifying as expert witnesses in trials where causal claims are relevant, using as a case study the so-called L’Aquila trial, in which experts were summoned by the parties to testify on the causes of risk-related behavior by the inhabitants of an Italian city in early 2009. In particular, I analyze the process of selection of causal loci, the attribution and removal of agency, the increase and decrease of causal factors in the explanation of an event, and the delimitation of the explanandum. As a general insight derived from the case, it is argued that the position of experts in a trial––which side summons them––may be a more important factor than their branch of expertise to account for certain types of these practices.

...More

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB603433424/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Victor Toom; (July 2016)
Whose Body Is It? Technolegal Materialization of Victims’ Bodies and Remains after the World Trade Center Terrorist Attacks (/isis/citation/CBB903588937/)

Article Jaakko Taipale; (June 2019)
Judges’ socio-technical review of contested expertise (/isis/citation/CBB635897203/)

Article Florencia Arancibia; Renata Motta; (2019)
Undone Science and Counter-Expertise: Fighting for Justice in an Argentine Community Contaminated by Pesticides (/isis/citation/CBB193478831/)

Article Marcus B. Carrier; (2021)
The Making of Evident Expertise: Transforming Chemical Analytical Methods into Judicial Evidence (/isis/citation/CBB614136192/)

Article Winter, Alison; (2007)
A Forensics of the Mind (/isis/citation/CBB000772263/)

Article Logan D. A. Williams; (March 2018)
Mapping Superpositionality in Global Ethnography (/isis/citation/CBB873960993/)

Article Giampietro Gobo; Barbara Sena; (2022)
Questioning and Disputing Vaccination Policies. Scientists and Experts in the Italian Public Debate (/isis/citation/CBB026130989/)

Article W. John Koolage; Lauren M. Williams; Morgen L. Barroso; (2021)
An infrastructural account of scientific objectivity for legal contexts and bloodstain pattern analysis (/isis/citation/CBB434670765/)

Thesis VandeWall, Holly R.; (2011)
Expertise and the Disunity of Science: A Case Study in the Difficulties of Providing Expert Advice for Policy (/isis/citation/CBB001562723/)

Book Jinee Lokaneeta; (2020)
The Truth Machines: Policing, Violence, and Scientific Interrogations in India (/isis/citation/CBB848872389/)

Article Stuart Kirsch; (2022)
Scientific Ghostwriting in the Amazon? The Role of Experts in the Lawsuit against Chevron in Ecuador (/isis/citation/CBB754705265/)

Article Daphne Rozenblatt; (2017)
Scientific Expertise and the Politics of Emotions in the 1902 Trial of Giuseppe Musolino (/isis/citation/CBB271858875/)

Article M'charek, Amade; Hagendijk, Rob; Vries, Wiebe de; (2013)
Equal before the Law: On the Machinery of Sameness in Forensic DNA Practice (/isis/citation/CBB001320664/)

Article Logan D. A. Williams; Sharlissa Moore; (2019)
Guest Editorial: Conceptualizing Justice and Counter-Expertise (/isis/citation/CBB521476031/)

Book Ramses Delafontaine; (2015)
Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation: A Controversial Legal Practice (/isis/citation/CBB819121205/)

Article Kruse, Corinna; (October 2013)
The Bayesian approach to forensic evidence: Evaluating, communicating, and distributing responsibility (/isis/citation/CBB366782410/)

Article Aviram Sharma; (2017)
Drinking Water Quality in Indian Water Policies, Laws, and Courtrooms: Understanding the Intersections of Science and Law in Developing Countries (/isis/citation/CBB115411091/)

Article Philip R. Egert; Barbara L. Allen; (2019)
Knowledge Justice: An Opportunity for Counter-expertise in Security vs. Science Debates (/isis/citation/CBB135681924/)

Article Vivette García Deister; (2023)
Critical contacts: making STS public amid Mexico’s forensic crisis (/isis/citation/CBB673784229/)

Article María Fernanda Olarte-Sierra; (2019)
Of flesh and bone: Emotional and affective ethnography of forensic anthropology practices amidst an armed conflict (/isis/citation/CBB046116318/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}