Canales, Jimena (Author)
Princeton University Press
Physical Details: 416
Language: English
How scientists through the ages have conducted thought experiments using imaginary entities―demons―to test the laws of nature and push the frontiers of what is possible Science may be known for banishing the demons of superstition from the modern world. Yet just as the demon-haunted world was being exorcized by the enlightening power of reason, a new kind of demon mischievously materialized in the scientific imagination itself. Scientists began to employ hypothetical beings to perform certain roles in thought experiments―experiments that can only be done in the imagination―and these impish assistants helped scientists achieve major breakthroughs that pushed forward the frontiers of science and technology.Spanning four centuries of discovery―from René Descartes, whose demon could hijack sensorial reality, to James Clerk Maxwell, whose molecular-sized demon deftly broke the second law of thermodynamics, to Darwin, Einstein, Feynman, and beyond―Jimena Canales tells a shadow history of science and the demons that bedevil it. She reveals how the greatest scientific thinkers used demons to explore problems, test the limits of what is possible, and better understand nature. Their imaginary familiars helped unlock the secrets of entropy, heredity, relativity, quantum mechanics, and other scientific wonders―and continue to inspire breakthroughs in the realms of computer science, artificial intelligence, and economics today.The world may no longer be haunted as it once was, but the demons of the scientific imagination are alive and well, continuing to play a vital role in scientists' efforts to explore the unknown and make the impossible real.
...MoreReview Michael T. Stuart (2023) Review of "Bedeviled: A Shadow History of Demons in Science". Isis: International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences (pp. 426-427).
Review Rawad El Skaf (2022) Review of "Bedeviled: A Shadow History of Demons in Science". History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences (p. 6).
Similar Citations
Article
Axel Gelfert;
(2014)
Observation, Inference, and Imagination: Elements of Edgar Allan Poe’s Philosophy of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB191773633/)
Article
Catherine Greene;
(2021)
Historical Counterfactuals, Transition Periods, and the Constraints on Imagination
(/isis/citation/CBB731857942/)
Article
Doina-Cristina Rusu;
(2022)
Fascination and Action at a Distance in Francis Bacon
(/isis/citation/CBB274771071/)
Chapter
James W. McAllister;
(2012)
Thought Experiment and the Exercise of Imagination in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB240679175/)
Article
Tobias Rosefeldt;
(2021)
Kant on the epistemic role of the imagination
(/isis/citation/CBB840115611/)
Book
Milena Ivanova;
Steven French;
(2020)
The Aesthetics of Science: Beauty, Imagination and Understanding
(/isis/citation/CBB662409369/)
Book
Francesco Brusori;
(2022)
La mente come specchio flessibile. Storia e preistoria dell'immaginazione produttiva tra XV e XVIII secolo
(/isis/citation/CBB551012698/)
Chapter
Chen-Morris, Raz;
(2013)
Imagination, Passions, and the Production of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe: From Lipsius to Descartes
(/isis/citation/CBB001201681/)
Article
A. Raghuramaraju;
(2016)
Debate as a Methodology of Knowledge Production in Pre-Modern India
(/isis/citation/CBB227982620/)
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001510107/)
Article
Lena Zuchowski;
(2019)
Modelling and knowledge transfer in complexity science
(/isis/citation/CBB732848503/)
Article
Lisa M. Osbeck;
Nancy J. Nersessian;
(2017)
Epistemic Identities in Interdisciplinary Science
(/isis/citation/CBB184282801/)
Essay Review
Kevin McCain;
(2018)
Indispensable Falsehoods
(/isis/citation/CBB218621435/)
Article
Jessica J. Williams;
(2020)
“The Shape of a Four-Footed Animal in General”: Kant on Empirical Schemata and the System of Nature
(/isis/citation/CBB994271803/)
Book
Lorenzo Magnani;
Tommaso Bertolotti;
(2017)
Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science
(/isis/citation/CBB558667543/)
Article
Cleland, Carol E.;
(2002)
Methodological and Epistemic Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000300401/)
Article
Potochnik, Angela;
(2012)
Feminist Implications of Model-Based Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001221696/)
Article
Kistner, Kelly;
(2013)
“A Word Factory Was Wanted”: Organizational Objectivity in the Making of the Oxford English Dictionary
(/isis/citation/CBB001320556/)
Article
Giuliano Mori;
(2016)
Democritus Junior as Reader of Auctoritates: Robert Burton’s Method and The Anatomy of Melancholy
(/isis/citation/CBB641315932/)
Article
Viktoria Tkaczyk;
Christine von Oertzen;
(2023)
Introduction: Reconsidering the Resources of Epistemic Tools
(/isis/citation/CBB421843702/)
Be the first to comment!