Buch, Anders (Author)
Loren Mark Ramsay (Author)
Hanne Løje (Author)
Engineering Studies
Volume: 14
Issue: 3
Pages: 195-215
Engineering education is under the sway of wide-ranging dynamics and drifts that have bearing on how education is enacted in relation to the research and innovation obligations of universities. Academic, applied, and third mission drifts seem to configure higher education in new ways. The article sets out to critically explore how knowledge production is discursively enacted in the teaching-research-practice-nexus in engineering universities of applied science (UAS) in Denmark. This paradigmatic case study maps discursive positionings and discusses how these positionings aspire to transform engineering education in the light of the wide-ranging drifts in higher education. Based on 17 qualitative in-depth interviews with researchers, teachers, and managers, the article maps the discursive positions taken and not-taken in relation to the enactment of the teaching-research-practice-nexus. The exploration is guided by a theory-method-package inspired by situational analysis and interviewing methods developed in practice-based approaches as interview-to-the-double. The analysis identifies four discursive positions in the teaching-research-practice-nexus that enact knowledge production in engineering UAS differently. Furthermore, three unavailable discursive positions are identified. Interpretive flexibility makes different discursive enactments of knowledge production possible. The study concludes that (1) that the primary mission of UAS in Denmark is teaching; research and engagement with practice are subordinate missions; (2) that the applied and third mission drift has been effective in instituting alternative discursive enactments; (3) some positions are seemingly discursively illegitimate. The undisputability of the educational mission – and the applied and third mission drifts – seems to effectively outweigh academic drift in the Danish UAS.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Greg Rulifson;
Angela R. Bielefeldt;
(December 2017)
Motivations to Leave Engineering: Through a Lens of Social Responsibility
(/isis/citation/CBB299430682/)
Article
Amy E. Slaton;
Alice L. Pawley;
(2018)
The Power and Politics of Engineering Education Research Design: Saving the ‘Small N’
(/isis/citation/CBB348947780/)
Article
Caitlin D. Wylie;
Suk Jun Kim;
(2022)
Socialization, Tacit Knowledge, and Conceptions of ‘Experience’ among Engineers
(/isis/citation/CBB723914962/)
Article
Megan E. Tomko;
Robert L. Nagel;
Wendy Newstetter;
Shaunna F. Smith;
Kimberly G. Talley;
Julie Linsey;
(2021)
Making a Makerspace: Identified Practices in the Formation of a University Makerspace
(/isis/citation/CBB410526220/)
Article
Tracy B. Grimm;
Sharra Vostral;
(2019)
Archive as Laboratory: Engaging STEM Students & STEM Collections
(/isis/citation/CBB458331203/)
Article
Stephen Secules;
(2019)
Making the Familiar Strange: An Ethnographic Scholarship of Integration Contextualizing Engineering Educational Culture as Masculine and Competitive
(/isis/citation/CBB166860909/)
Article
Panofsky, Aaron;
(February 2011)
Generating sociability to drive science: Patient advocacy organizations and genetics research
(/isis/citation/CBB539545509/)
Article
Ben Lutz;
Marie C. Paretti;
(2021)
Exploring the Social and Cultural Dimensions of Learning for Recent Engineering Graduates during the School-to-Work Transition
(/isis/citation/CBB414391940/)
Article
Peat Leith;
Frank Vanclay;
(November 2015)
Translating Science to Benefit Diverse Publics: Engagement Pathways for Linking Climate Risk, Uncertainty, and Agricultural Identities
(/isis/citation/CBB370881735/)
Chapter
William Poole;
Anna Marie Roos;
Gideon Manning;
(2023)
Learning by Crib: Some Seventeenth-Century Oxford ‘Systems’
(/isis/citation/CBB631495304/)
Book
María Luisa Eschenhagen Durán;
(2016)
Repensar la educación ambiental superior: Puntos de partida desde los caminos del saber ambiental. [Rethinking higher environmental education: Starting points from the paths of environmental knowledge]
(/isis/citation/CBB035391989/)
Article
Venla Oikkonen;
(October 2017)
Affect, technoscience and textual analysis: Interrogating the affective dynamics of the Zika epidemic through media texts
(/isis/citation/CBB210701382/)
Article
Dana Zarhin;
(March 2018)
“I Don’t Want to See Myself as a Disabled Person”: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Devices and the Emergence of (Dis)ability as Subjectivity
(/isis/citation/CBB369463842/)
Article
Joanna Weidler-Lewis;
(2020)
Transformation and Stasis: An Exploration of LGBTQA Students Prefiguring the Social Practices of Engineering for Greater Inclusivity
(/isis/citation/CBB557041160/)
Article
Jacqueline Rohde;
Derrick J. Satterfield;
Miguel Rodriguez;
Allison Godwin;
Geoff Potvin;
Lisa Benson;
Adam Kirn;
(2020)
Anyone, but not Everyone: Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Claims of Who Can Do Engineering
(/isis/citation/CBB610221987/)
Article
Florman, Samuel;
(Winter 2015)
An Interview with . . . Samuel C. Florman
(/isis/citation/CBB714719285/)
Article
Scholz, Tom;
(Spring 2016)
An Interview with . . . Tom Scholz
(/isis/citation/CBB500872908/)
Article
Bentil, Ekua;
(Summer 2019)
An Interview with...Ekua Bentil, World Bank Specialist
(/isis/citation/CBB934517049/)
Article
Jean, Jason;
Yixi Lu;
(August 2018)
Evolution as a fact? A discourse analysis
(/isis/citation/CBB562156844/)
Article
Veronika Zuskáčová;
(December 2020)
How We Understand Aeromobility: Mapping the Evolution of a New Term in Mobility Studies
(/isis/citation/CBB648164093/)
Be the first to comment!