Article ID: CBB600570309

Discursive Enactments of Knowledge Production in Engineering Education (2022)

unapi

Engineering education is under the sway of wide-ranging dynamics and drifts that have bearing on how education is enacted in relation to the research and innovation obligations of universities. Academic, applied, and third mission drifts seem to configure higher education in new ways. The article sets out to critically explore how knowledge production is discursively enacted in the teaching-research-practice-nexus in engineering universities of applied science (UAS) in Denmark. This paradigmatic case study maps discursive positionings and discusses how these positionings aspire to transform engineering education in the light of the wide-ranging drifts in higher education. Based on 17 qualitative in-depth interviews with researchers, teachers, and managers, the article maps the discursive positions taken and not-taken in relation to the enactment of the teaching-research-practice-nexus. The exploration is guided by a theory-method-package inspired by situational analysis and interviewing methods developed in practice-based approaches as interview-to-the-double. The analysis identifies four discursive positions in the teaching-research-practice-nexus that enact knowledge production in engineering UAS differently. Furthermore, three unavailable discursive positions are identified. Interpretive flexibility makes different discursive enactments of knowledge production possible. The study concludes that (1) that the primary mission of UAS in Denmark is teaching; research and engagement with practice are subordinate missions; (2) that the applied and third mission drift has been effective in instituting alternative discursive enactments; (3) some positions are seemingly discursively illegitimate. The undisputability of the educational mission – and the applied and third mission drifts – seems to effectively outweigh academic drift in the Danish UAS.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB600570309/

Similar Citations

Article Greg Rulifson; Angela R. Bielefeldt; (December 2017)
Motivations to Leave Engineering: Through a Lens of Social Responsibility

Article Amy E. Slaton; Alice L. Pawley; (2018)
The Power and Politics of Engineering Education Research Design: Saving the ‘Small N’

Article T. Y. Branch; G. M. Duché; (2024)
Affective Labor in Integrative STS Research

Article Caitlin D. Wylie; Suk Jun Kim; (2022)
Socialization, Tacit Knowledge, and Conceptions of ‘Experience’ among Engineers

Article Megan E. Tomko; Robert L. Nagel; Wendy Newstetter; Shaunna F. Smith; Kimberly G. Talley; Julie Linsey; (2021)
Making a Makerspace: Identified Practices in the Formation of a University Makerspace

Article Tracy B. Grimm; Sharra Vostral; (2019)
Archive as Laboratory: Engaging STEM Students & STEM Collections

Article Stephen Secules; (2019)
Making the Familiar Strange: An Ethnographic Scholarship of Integration Contextualizing Engineering Educational Culture as Masculine and Competitive

Article Panofsky, Aaron; (February 2011)
Generating sociability to drive science: Patient advocacy organizations and genetics research

Article Christine Aicardi; Tara Mahfoud; (2024)
Formal and Informal Infrastructures of Collaboration in the Human Brain Project

Article Ben Lutz; Marie C. Paretti; (2021)
Exploring the Social and Cultural Dimensions of Learning for Recent Engineering Graduates during the School-to-Work Transition

Article Peat Leith; Frank Vanclay; (November 2015)
Translating Science to Benefit Diverse Publics: Engagement Pathways for Linking Climate Risk, Uncertainty, and Agricultural Identities

Article Venla Oikkonen; (October 2017)
Affect, technoscience and textual analysis: Interrogating the affective dynamics of the Zika epidemic through media texts

Article Dana Zarhin; (March 2018)
“I Don’t Want to See Myself as a Disabled Person”: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Devices and the Emergence of (Dis)ability as Subjectivity

Chapter William Poole; Anna Marie Roos; Gideon Manning; (2023)
Learning by Crib: Some Seventeenth-Century Oxford ‘Systems’

Book María Luisa Eschenhagen Durán; (2016)
Repensar la educación ambiental superior: Puntos de partida desde los caminos del saber ambiental. [Rethinking higher environmental education: Starting points from the paths of environmental knowledge]

Book Emily J. Levine; (2024)
Allies and Rivals: German-American Exchange and the Rise of the Modern Research University

Article Joanna Weidler-Lewis; (2020)
Transformation and Stasis: An Exploration of LGBTQA Students Prefiguring the Social Practices of Engineering for Greater Inclusivity

Article Jacqueline Rohde; Derrick J. Satterfield; Miguel Rodriguez; Allison Godwin; Geoff Potvin; Lisa Benson; Adam Kirn; (2020)
Anyone, but not Everyone: Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Claims of Who Can Do Engineering

Article Florman, Samuel; (Winter 2015)
An Interview with . . . Samuel C. Florman

Article Scholz, Tom; (Spring 2016)
An Interview with . . . Tom Scholz

Authors & Contributors
Aicardi, Christine
Florman, Samuel C.
Manning, Gideon
Poole, William
Roos, Anna Marie Eleanor
Slaton, Amy E.
Journals
Engineering Studies
Science, Technology, and Human Values
The Bridge: Journal of the National Academy of Engineering
Social Studies of Science
Publishers
University of Chicago Press
Springer International Publishing
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana
Concepts
Education, engineering
Interviews
Science and technology studies (STS)
Engineering
Qualitative research
Research
People
Florman, Samuel C.
Prideaux, John
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
17th century
19th century
Places
United States
Australia
Germany
Oxford (England)
Institutions
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT
Oxford University
Boston (band)
Human Brain Project
European Union
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment