Elliott, Steve (Author)
To identify and conceptualize research problems in science, philosophers and often scientists rely on classical accounts of problems that focus on intellectual problems defined in relation to theories. Recently, philosophers have begun to study the structures and functions of research problems not defined in relation to theories. Furthermore, scientists have long pursued research problems often labeled as practical or applied. As yet, no account of problems specifies the description of both so-called intellectual problems and so-called applied problems. This article proposes a new conceptual framework of problems that accounts both for intellectual aspects of problems and for their practical or applied aspects. I illustrate the account with an example of a recent research project from evolutionary biology, and I indicate further routes by that to develop the account, especially in connection to empirical studies of science.
...More
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001510107/)
Article
Kleiner, Scott A.;
(2003)
Explanatory Coherence and Empirical Adequacy: The Problem of Abduction, and the Justification of Evolutionary Models
(/isis/citation/CBB000340587/)
Article
Carus, A. W.;
(2010)
The Pragmatics of Scientific Knowledge: Howard Stein's Reshaping of Logical Empiricism
(/isis/citation/CBB001221444/)
Article
Berson, Jerome A.;
(2008)
Fundamental Theories and Their Empirical Patches
(/isis/citation/CBB000930626/)
Article
Martins dos Reis, Claudio Ricardo;
(2013)
A argumentação darwiniana em A origem das espécies: de casos específicos a princípios gerais
(/isis/citation/CBB001212570/)
Thesis
Love, Alan Christopher;
(2005)
Explaining Evolutionary Innovation and Novelty: A Historical and Philosophical Study of Biological Concepts
(/isis/citation/CBB001560817/)
Article
Henri Buc;
Pierre-Olivier Méthot;
(2020)
1970, Le Hasard et la nécessité et La Logique du vivant: Quelques souvenirs des uns et des autres
(/isis/citation/CBB863384412/)
Article
Dietrich, Michael R.;
Skipper, Robert A., Jr.;
(2007)
Manipulating Underdetermination in Scientific Controversy: The Case of the Molecular Clock
(/isis/citation/CBB000830784/)
Article
Baptiste Bedessem;
Stéphanie Ruphy;
(2019)
Scientific autonomy and the unpredictability of scientific inquiry: The unexpected might not be where you would expect
(/isis/citation/CBB397945367/)
Article
Franklin, Allan;
(2004)
Doing Much about Nothing
(/isis/citation/CBB000470255/)
Article
Peter R. Anstey;
(2016)
The Coherence of Cohesion in the Later Leibniz
(/isis/citation/CBB522015706/)
Book
Hertler, Christine;
(2001)
Morphologische Methoden in der Evolutionsforschung
(/isis/citation/CBB000100233/)
Book
Venkatesh Narayanamurti;
Jeffrey Y. Tsao;
(2021)
The Genesis of Technoscientific Revolutions: Rethinking the Nature and Nurture of Research
(/isis/citation/CBB200812792/)
Book
Soler, Lena;
(2012)
Characterizing the Robustness of Science: After the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001213208/)
Article
Petri Ylikoski;
Julie Zahle;
(2019)
Case study research in the social sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB893149132/)
Chapter
Nenad Miščević;
(2012)
Political Thought Experiments from Plato to Rawls
(/isis/citation/CBB233061316/)
Chapter
James W. McAllister;
(2012)
Thought Experiment and the Exercise of Imagination in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB240679175/)
Article
Suárez, Edna;
(2001)
Satellite-DNA: A case-study for the evolution of experimental techniques
(/isis/citation/CBB000100743/)
Article
Christopher Pincock;
(2022)
Concrete Scale Models, Essential Idealization, and Causal Explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB484696849/)
Article
Mary S. Morgan;
(2019)
Exemplification and the use-values of cases and case studies
(/isis/citation/CBB151505081/)
Be the first to comment!