During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was disagreement over whether the science supported facemask mandates. This paper interrogates debates over this question, paying particular attention to an ambiguity between two scientific virtues: epistemic caution and epistemic responsiveness. I suggest that there is an argument from each virtue to reasons to trust scientists’ claims in policy debate. However, as the case of facemask debates illustrates, it is not clear that scientists can possess both virtues simultaneously: the two virtues are in tension. After showing how this general framework can help us better understand debate, I turn to consider some possible ways of resolving this tension, arguing that none of them is entirely satisfactory.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Gil Eyal;
(2022)
Mistrust in Numbers: Regulatory Science, Trans-science and the Crisis of Expertise
(/isis/citation/CBB212129456/)
Article
Tiago Ribeiro Duarte;
(2020)
Ignoring scientific advice during the Covid-19 pandemic: Bolsonaro’s actions and discourse
(/isis/citation/CBB565587316/)
Article
Shobita Parthasarathy;
(2022)
How to Be an Epistemic Trespasser
(/isis/citation/CBB968694595/)
Article
Robert Evans;
(February 2022)
SAGE advice and political decision-making: ‘Following the science’ in times of epistemic uncertainty
(/isis/citation/CBB466460955/)
Book
Gil Eyal;
(2019)
The Crisis of Expertise
(/isis/citation/CBB193528078/)
Article
Christian Ross;
(2022)
Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing
(/isis/citation/CBB828766557/)
Article
Stefano Crabu;
Ilenia Picardi;
Valentina Turrini;
(2023)
Refused-knowledge during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mobilising Experiential Expertise for Care and Well-being
(/isis/citation/CBB291581369/)
Thesis
David Merritt Johns;
(2019)
Good Evidence, Bad Evidence: Science, Ethics, and the Politics of Making and Unmaking Public Health Policies
(/isis/citation/CBB199543025/)
Book
Alexa Geisthövel;
Volker Hess;
(2017)
Medizinisches Gutachten: Geschichte einer neuzeitlichen Praxis
(/isis/citation/CBB228276706/)
Article
Henry M. Cowles;
Chitra Ramalingam;
(2022)
Introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB356636672/)
Book
Collins, Harry;
Evans, Robert;
(2007)
Rethinking Expertise
(/isis/citation/CBB000820155/)
Article
Ayça Fackler;
(2021)
When Science Denial Meets Epistemic Understanding
(/isis/citation/CBB538668203/)
Article
Siemsen, Hayo;
(2010)
The Mach-Planck Debate Revisited: Democratization of Science or Elite Knowledge?
(/isis/citation/CBB001034670/)
Article
Mason Majszak;
Julie Jebeile;
(2023)
Expert judgment in climate science: How it is used and how it can be justified
(/isis/citation/CBB893739691/)
Article
Poliana Maia;
Rosária Justi;
Monique Santos;
(2021)
Aspects About Science in the Context of Production and Communication of Knowledge of COVID-19
(/isis/citation/CBB033270554/)
Article
Luciano Levin;
(2020)
Advising and controling: Science communication at a crossroads
(/isis/citation/CBB642580991/)
Article
Giampietro Gobo;
Barbara Sena;
(2022)
Questioning and Disputing Vaccination Policies. Scientists and Experts in the Italian Public Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB026130989/)
Book
Fabiana Li;
(2015)
Unearthing Conflict: Corporate Mining, Activism, and Expertise in Peru
(/isis/citation/CBB165149143/)
Book
Andrew J. Hogan;
(2022)
Disability Dialogues: Advocacy, Science, and Prestige in Postwar Clinical Professions
(/isis/citation/CBB207448799/)
Article
Cristiano B. Moura;
Matheus Monteiro Nascimento;
Nathan Willig Lima;
(2021)
Epistemic and Political Confrontations Around the Public Policies to Fight COVID-19 Pandemic
(/isis/citation/CBB979964202/)
Be the first to comment!