Article ID: CBB585944903

Crucial Instances and Francis Bacon’s Quest for Certainty (2017)

unapi

Francis Bacon’s method of induction is often understood as a form of eliminative induction. The idea, on this interpretation, is to list the possible formal causes of a phenomenon and, by reference to a copious and reliable natural history, to falsify all of them but one. Whatever remains must be the formal cause. Bacon’s crucial instances are often seen as the crowning example of this method. In this article, I argue that this interpretation of crucial instances is mistaken, and it has caused us to lose sight of why Bacon assigns crucial instances a special role in his quest for epistemic certainty about formal causes. If crucial instances are interpreted eliminatively, then they are subject to the two problems related to underdetermination raised by Duhem: (1) that it is impossible to be certain one has specified all of the possible alternatives and (2) that an experiment falsifies a whole theory, not just a single hypothesis in isolation. I show that Bacon anticipates and aims to dodge both of these problems by conceiving of crucial instances as working, in the ideal case, through direct affirmations that are supported by links to more foundational knowledge.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB585944903/

Similar Citations

Thesis McCaskey, John P.; (2006)
Regula Socratis: The Rediscovery of Ancient Induction in Early Modern England (/isis/citation/CBB001560728/)

Article Snyder, Laura J.; (1999)
Renovating the Novum Organum: Bacon, Whewell and induction (/isis/citation/CBB000111667/)

Article Fate, Victor Joseph Di; (2011)
Is Newton a “Radical Empiricist” about Method? (/isis/citation/CBB001024138/)

Article Douglas, Heather; (2000)
Inductive risk and values in science (/isis/citation/CBB000110766/)

Article Achinstein, Peter; (2010)
The War on Induction: Whewell Takes on Newton and Mill (Norton Takes On Everyone) (/isis/citation/CBB001230085/)

Book Francesco Nappo; (2024)
L'analogia nell'indagine scientifica. A difesa della funzione induttiva (/isis/citation/CBB387618128/)

Article Davies, E. B.; (2003)
The Newtonian Myth (/isis/citation/CBB000340901/)

Article Chris Walker; (2019)
Karl Jaspers and Karl Popper: the shared legacy (/isis/citation/CBB353883243/)

Article Weatherson, Brian; (1999)
Begging the question and Bayesians (/isis/citation/CBB000110819/)

Article Magnus, P. D.; (2010)
Inductions, Red Herrings, and the Best Explanation for the Mixed Record of Science (/isis/citation/CBB001230043/)

Book Wesley C. Salmon; (2017)
The Foundations of Scientific Inference: 50th Anniversary Edition (/isis/citation/CBB614284286/)

Book Kent W. Staley; (2014)
An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (/isis/citation/CBB887441099/)

Article Cornelis Menke; (2018)
The Whewell-Mill Debate on Predictions, from Mill's Point of View (/isis/citation/CBB045518739/)

Article Weber, Marcel; (2009)
The Crux of Crucial Experiments: Duhem's Problems and Inference to the Best Explanation (/isis/citation/CBB001230044/)

Article Sara Bianchini; (2014)
Montaigne e Popper. L'induzione e la scienza (/isis/citation/CBB849175611/)

Article Cobb, Aaron D.; (2012)
Inductivism in Practice: Experiment in John Herschel's Philosophy of Science (/isis/citation/CBB001232109/)

Article Kelly, Thomas; (2010)
Hume, Norton, and Induction without Rules (/isis/citation/CBB001230086/)

Article Balzer, Wolfgang; (2002)
Methodological Patterns in a Structuralist Setting (/isis/citation/CBB000200012/)

Authors & Contributors
Achinstein, Peter
Balzer, Wolfgang
Cobb, Aaron D.
Davies, E. B.
Di Fate, Victor Joseph
Douglas, Heather E.
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Philosophy of Science
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
British Journal for the History of Science
Bruniana & Campanelliana: Ricerche Filosofiche e Materiali Storico-testuali
History of Psychiatry
Publishers
Stanford University
Cambridge University Press
Franco Angeli
University of Pittsburgh Press
Concepts
Induction
Philosophy of science
Methodology of science; scientific method
Philosophy
Deduction
Inference
People
Bacon, Francis, 1st Baron Verulam
Newton, Isaac
Popper, Karl Raimund
Whewell, William
Mill, John Stuart
Norton, John
Time Periods
19th century
20th century
18th century
17th century
16th century
Places
Great Britain
Europe
England
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment