Systematic errors in Galileo's astronomical observations and alleged anomalies in the position of Neptune (2022)
Enrico Bernieri (Author)
Gheorghe Stratan (Author)
Sara Bacchini (Author)
Liviu Mircea (Author)
Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage
Volume: 25
Issue: 2
Pages: 227-236
In 1980 Kowal and Drake found that in December 1612 and January 1613 Galileo observed the planet Neptune. At that time, according to these authors, Galileo was able to measure angular separations with an accuracy of about 10 seconds of arc. However, as noticed by Kowal and Drake, the position of Neptune reported by Galileo is wrong with respect to the position computed with the modern ephemeris of about 1 minute of arc. This led Kowal and Drake to speculate on the possible errors of modern ephemeris of Neptune and sparked some debate about Neptune's ephemeris and/or possible errors in Galileo's measures. Until today this anomaly has remained without a conclusive answer. Here we show that, in addition to the random errors, there are other significant measurement errors present in Galileo's observations. These errors may help clarify the origin of the alleged anomalies in the position of Neptune.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Gingerich, Owen;
Van Helden, Albert;
(2011)
How Galileo Constructed the Moons of Jupiter
Chapter
Palmerino, Carla Rita;
(2007)
Bodies in Water like Planets in the Skies: Uses and Abuses of Analogical Reasoning in the Study of Planetary Motion
Chapter
Nauenberg, Michael;
(2006)
Robert Hooke's Seminal Contribution to Orbital Dynamics
Article
Aït-Touati, Frédérique;
(2012)
“Give Me a Telescope and I Shall Move the Earth”: Hooke's Attempt to Prove the Motion of the Earth from Observations
Article
Laurynas Adomaitis;
(2019)
Equivalence of hypotheses and Galilean censure in Leibniz: A conspiracy or a way to moderate censure?
Book
Standage, Tom;
(2000)
The Neptune File: A Story of Astronomical Rivalry and the Pioneers of Planet Hunting
Book
Hetherington, Norriss S.;
(2006)
Planetary Motions: A Historical Perspective
Article
Graney, Christopher M.;
(2008)
But Still, It Moves: Tides, Stellar Parallax, and Galileo's Commitment to the Copernican Theory
Article
Viktor Abramovich Shor;
(2021)
Twentieth-century milestones in the history of the Russian ephemeris service: Marking 100 years of the Calculation Institute and astronomical yearbook
Article
Gerard Gilmore FRS;
Gudrun Tausch-Pebody;
(2020)
The 1919 Eclipse Results That Verified General Relativity and Their Later Detractors: A Story Re-Told
Multimedia Object
Philip Glass;
(2013)
Galileo Galilei [Audio CD]
Article
Graney, Christopher M.;
(2011)
Contra Galileo: Riccioli's “Coriolis-Force” Argument on the Earth's Diurnal Rotation
Book
Carolyn Kennett;
(2023)
Uranus and Neptune
Article
Kollerstrom, Nicholas;
(2009)
The Naming of Neptune
Article
Stephen Case;
(2019)
A “Confounded Scrape”: John Herschel, Neptune, and Naming the Satellites of the Outer Solar System
Article
Katayama, Errol G.;
(2011)
Soul and Elemental Motion in Aristotle's Physics VIII 4
Chapter
Débarbat, Suzanne;
Dumont, Simone;
(2001)
Des observations astronomiques vieilles de deux siècles toujours d'actualité -- Un exemple relatif à Neptune
Book
Fontana, Francesco;
(2001)
New Observations of Heavenly and Earthly Objects
Article
Pedersen, Kurt Møller;
Kragh, Helge;
(2008)
The Phantom Moon of Venus, 1645--1768
Article
Granada, Miguel A.;
(2010)
“A quo moventur planetae?” Kepler et la question de l'agent du mouvement planétaire après la disparition des orbes solides
Be the first to comment!