Hoquet, Thierry (Author)
Journal for General Philosophy of Science
Volume: 52
Issue: 1
Pages: 115-134
In the wake of recent attempts at alternate history (Bowler 2013), this paper suggests several avenues for a pluralistic approach to Charles Darwin and his role in the history of evolutionary theory. We examine in what sense Darwin could be described as a major driver of theoretical change in the history of biology. First, this paper examines how Darwin influenced the future of biological science: not merely by stating the fact of evolution or by bringing evidence for it; but by discovering natural selection, and giving it pre-eminence over any other mechanism for evolution; and also by proposing a masterful and quite unique synthesis of many scientific fields. Contrasting Darwin’s views with those of A.R. Wallace, I conclude that “natural selection” is clearly an original contribution, that it had no forerunners or co-discoverers, and could barely have appeared after Darwin conceived of it. This specificity of Darwin’s contribution is an invitation to be strongly presentist (Loison 2016) and to adopt only weak counter-factuals. In contrast, there are possible ways to use strong counter-factuals as attempts to “pluralize” the history of biological theory: i.e. imagine new possible avenues for the development of evolutionary biology. The idea that evolution was a theory “in the air” suggests that evolutionary theory could have developed in a world without Darwin, especially if we accept to delete not only “Darwin” but “England”. France and Germany are examined as possible countries where evolutionary ideas would have thrived even with no contribution from the English scientists. Finally, the paper suggests another counter-factual hypothesis: deleting not Darwin and his Origin but the Darwin Industry itself. This may allow us to read the Origin of Species with fresh eyes and to discover Darwin’s life-long interest in variation and its laws, as many of his early readers did.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Beer, Gillian;
(2009)
Darwin and the Uses of Extinction
Article
Kathryn Tabb;
(2016)
Darwin at Orchis Bank: Selection after the Origin
Article
Curtis N. Johnson;
(2019)
Charles Darwin, Richard Owen, and Natural Selection: A Question of Priority
Book
Ruse, Michael;
Travis, Joseph;
(2009)
Evolution: The First Four Billion Years
Article
Brink-Roby, Heather;
(2009)
Natural Representation: Diagram and Text in Darwin's On the Origin of Species
Book
Stott, Rebecca;
(2003)
Darwin and the Barnacle
Chapter
Engels, Eve-Marie;
(2009)
Charles Darwins geheimnisvolle Revolution
Chapter
Rupke, Nicolaas;
(2010)
Darwin's Choice
Book
Donohue, Kathleen;
(2011)
Darwin's Finches: Readings in the Evolution of a Scientific Paradigm
Book
Gardiner, Brian;
Milner, Richard;
Morris, Mary;
(2008)
Survival of the Fittest: A Special Issue of the Linnean Celebrating the 150th Anniversary of the Darwin-Wallace Theory of Evolution
Book
Creath, Richard;
Maienschein, Jane;
(2000)
Biology and epistemology
Article
Luca Tambolo;
(2020)
An unappreciated merit of counterfactual histories of science
Article
Joachim L. Dagg;
(2019)
Motives and merits of counterfactual histories of science
Article
J. H. van Hateren;
(2014)
Intrinsic estimates of fitness affect the causal structure of evolutionary change
Article
Rolf Löther;
(2010)
„Kampf ums Dasein― vor, bei und nach Darwin
Thesis
Eugene, Earnshaw-Whyte.;
(2012)
Modeling Evolution
Article
John Hollier;
Anita Hollier;
(2023)
René-Edouard Claparède (1832–1871), Genevan naturalist and early adopter of Darwin's theory of evolution
Book
Grosz, Elizabeth;
(2011)
Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art
Book
Wyhe, John Van;
(2013)
Dispelling the Darkness: Voyage in the Malay Archipelago and the Discovery of Evolution by Wallace and Darwin
Article
Canseco, Juan;
(2006)
Conflitto e confronto: l'evoluzionismo materialista di Darwin e l'evoluzionismo spiritualista di Wallace
Be the first to comment!