Anne Conway’s philosophy has been categorized as “vitalism,” “vital monism,” “spiritualism,” “monistic spiritualism,” “immaterial vitalism,” and “antimaterialism.” While there is no doubt that she is a monist and a vitalist, problems arise with the categories of “spiritualism,” “immaterial vitalism,” and “antimaterialism.” Conway conceives of created substances as gross and fixed spirit, or rarefied and volatile matter. While interpreters agree that Conway’s “spirit” shares characteristics traditionally attributed to matter (e.g., extension, divisibility, impenetrability), and that she is critical of Henry More’s immaterial spirit, Conway’s spirit is still conceived as an immaterial soul-like or mind-like entity. I argue that Conway’s vitalism is material, and is best understood in the tradition of Renaissance vital naturalism. First, Conway does not criticize materialism per se, only mechanical materialism, which characterizes matter as lifeless. Her vitalism has to be materialistic in some sense, since only God is an immaterial substance. Second, Conway’s conceptions of matter and spirit, the language she uses, and the fact that she attributes thinking to extended, divisible, and impenetrable substances all place her within the tradition of Renaissance vital naturalism, wherein Bernardino Telesio, Tommaso Campanella, and Francis Bacon used “spirit” to account for all natural processes.
...More
Article
Emma Wilkins;
(2016)
‘Exploding’ Immaterial Substances: Margaret Cavendish’s Vitalist-Materialist Critique of Spirits
Article
Rosengren, Cecilia;
(2003)
Form, materia och barocka figurer i Anne Conways naturfilosofi
Article
Paola Rumore;
(2020)
Priestley in Germany
Article
Giglioni, Guido;
(2002)
Francis Glisson's Notion of confœderatio naturæ in the Context of Hylozoistic Corpuscularianism
Essay Review
Wahrig-Schmidt, Bettina;
(1999)
Leviathan without air-pump - but with system
Article
Chisick, Harvey;
(2008)
Interpreting the Enlightenment
Article
Wolters, Gereon;
(2001)
Hans Jonas' Philosophical Biology
Article
Catherine Wilson;
(2016)
Hume and Vital Materialism
Book
Charles Wolfe;
(2019)
La philosophie de la biologie avant la biologie: Une histoire du vitalisme
Chapter
Chang, Ku-Ming (Kevin);
(2007)
From Vitalistic Cosmos to Materialistic World: The Lineage of Johann Joachim Becher and Georg Ernst Stahl and the Shift of Early Modern Chymical Cosmology
Article
Jonathan L. Shaheen;
(2021)
The Life of the Thrice Sensitive, Rational and Wise Animate Matter: Cavendish’s Animism
Article
Jacqueline Broad;
(2018)
Conway and Charleton on the Intimate Presence of Souls in Bodies
Article
Emily Thomas;
(2017)
Time, Space, and Process in Anne Conway
Chapter
Hallacker, Anja;
(2008)
On Angelic Bodies: Some Philosophical Discussions in the 17th Century
Thesis
Byrne, David;
(2005)
Anne Conway: An Intellectual Portrait of a Seventeenth Century Viscountess
Article
Paolo Pecere;
(2021)
“Stahl Was Often Closer to the Truth”: Kant’s Second Thoughts on Animism, Monadology, and Hylozoism
Article
Erlingsson, Steinór J.;
(2002)
From Haeckelian Monist to Anti-Haeckelian Vitalist: The Transformation of the Icelandic Naturalist Thorvaldur Thoroddsen (1855--1921)
Article
Paolo Pecere;
(2023)
Materialism, Lebenskraft and the limits of science: Metaphysical vitalism in post-Kantian scenarios
Article
Kaitaro, Timo;
(2008)
Can Matter Mark the Hours? Eighteenth-Century Vitalist Materialism and Functional Properties
Article
Witt, Elke;
(2008)
Form---A Matter of Generation: The Relation of Generation, Form, and Function in the Epigenetic Theory of Caspar F. Wolff
Be the first to comment!