This paper explores what it takes for research laboratories to produce valuable knowledge in academic institutions marked by the coexistence of multiple evaluative frameworks. Drawing upon ethnographic fieldwork carried out in two UK-based epigenetics research laboratories, I examine the set of practices through which research groups intertwine knowledge production with the making of scientific, health, and wealth value. This includes building and maintaining a portfolio of valuable resources, such as expertise, scientific credibility, or data, and turning these resources into assets by carefully organizing and managing their value. Laboratories then put these assets to productive use within and outside their labs toward the creation or extraction of value. I identify two models for producing value within academic science: a commodity-based model whereby laboratories mobilize their assets to produce results, which can be converted into publications for the accumulation of credibility capital, and a rentier model of accumulation whereby laboratories own valuable assets, which they rent out to others outside their lab against revenue. Following recent developments in Science and Technology Studies on value production in the bioeconomy, I argue that the concepts of asset and rent are essential analytical tools for getting to grips with the origins of value within academic science.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Elina Helosvuori;
Riikka Homanen;
(June 2022)
When craft kicks back: Embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry
(/isis/citation/CBB035082879/)
Article
María Fernanda Olarte-Sierra;
(2019)
Of flesh and bone: Emotional and affective ethnography of forensic anthropology practices amidst an armed conflict
(/isis/citation/CBB046116318/)
Article
Alina Geampana;
Manuela Perrotta;
(2023)
Predicting Success in the Embryology Lab: The Use of Algorithmic Technologies in Knowledge Production
(/isis/citation/CBB717872146/)
Article
Sigrid Vertommen;
Vincenzo Pavone;
Michal Nahman;
(January 2022)
Global Fertility Chains: An Integrative Political Economy Approach to Understanding the Reproductive Bioeconomy
(/isis/citation/CBB344538475/)
Article
Centellas, Kate M.;
Smardon, Regina E.;
Fifield, Steve;
(2014)
Calibrating Translational Cancer Research: Collaboration without Consensus in Interdisciplinary Laboratory Meetings
(/isis/citation/CBB001421196/)
Article
Carsten Ochs;
Barbara Büttner;
Jörn Lamla;
(May 2021)
Trading Social Visibility for Economic Amenability: Data-based Value Translation on a “Health and Fitness Platform”
(/isis/citation/CBB474517087/)
Article
Steve G. Hoffman;
(July 2017)
Managing Ambiguities at the Edge of Knowledge: Research Strategy and Artificial Intelligence Labs in an Era of Academic Capitalism
(/isis/citation/CBB775831884/)
Article
Sarah R Davies;
Bao-Chau Pham;
(2023)
Luck and the ‘situations’ of research
(/isis/citation/CBB796332683/)
Article
June Jeon;
(December 2019)
Invisibilizing politics: Accepting and legitimating ignorance in environmental sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB717880925/)
Article
Kelly Joslin Holloway;
(September 2015)
Normalizing Complaint: Scientists and the Challenge of Commercialization
(/isis/citation/CBB582502078/)
Article
Joeri Bruyninckx;
(September 2017)
Synchronicity: Time, Technicians, Instruments, and Invisible Repair
(/isis/citation/CBB976044504/)
Article
Sandra Calkins;
(October 2021)
Toxic remains: Infrastructural failure in a Ugandan molecular biology lab
(/isis/citation/CBB094400545/)
Article
Sampsa Saikkonen;
Esa Väliverronen;
(2022)
The trickle-down of political and economic control: On the organizational suppression of environmental scientists in government science
(/isis/citation/CBB033206075/)
Article
Lambros Roumbanis;
(2022)
Disagreement and Agonistic Chance in Peer Review
(/isis/citation/CBB437513195/)
Article
Logan D. A. Williams;
(March 2018)
Mapping Superpositionality in Global Ethnography
(/isis/citation/CBB873960993/)
Article
María Elena Giraldo;
Eliana Arancibia Gutiérrez;
(2023)
Governance in socio-environmental research: an analysis of multi-stakeholder cooperation mechanisms in two research laboratories in Yucatan, Mexico
(/isis/citation/CBB497620424/)
Article
Nadine Levin;
Sabine Leonelli;
Dagmara Weckowska;
David Castle;
John Dupré;
(2016)
How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB530775467/)
Article
Beth Greenhough;
Emma Roe;
(July 2018)
Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector
(/isis/citation/CBB661318783/)
Article
Malte Ziewitz;
(October 2019)
Rethinking gaming: The ethical work of optimization in web search engines
(/isis/citation/CBB145358678/)
Article
Natali Valdez;
(2022)
The Politics of Postgenomic Reproduction: Exploring Pregnant Narratives from within a Clinical Trial
(/isis/citation/CBB617544692/)
Be the first to comment!