This paper examines the subversive role of statistics paleontology at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries. In particular, I will focus on German paleontology and its relationship with statistics. I argue that in paleontology, the quantitative method was questioned and strongly limited by the first decade of the 20th century because, as its opponents noted, when the fossil record is treated statistically, it was found to generate results openly in conflict with the Darwinian theory of evolution. Essentially, statistics questions the gradual mode of evolution and the role of natural selection. The main objections to statistics were addressed during the meetings at the Kaiserlich-Königliche Geologische Reichsanstalt in Vienna in the 1880s. After having introduced the statistical treatment of the fossil record, I will use the works of Charles Léo Lesquereux (1806–1889), Joachim Barrande (1799–1833), and Henry Shaler Williams (1847–1918) to compare the objections raised in Vienna with how the statistical treatment of the data worked in practice. Furthermore, I will discuss the criticisms of Melchior Neumayr (1845–1890), one of the leading German opponents of statistical paleontology, to show why, and to what extent, statistics were questioned in Vienna. The final part of this paper considers what paleontologists can derive from a statistical notion of data: the necessity of opening a discussion about the completeness and nature of the paleontological data. The Vienna discussion about which method paleontologists should follow offers an interesting case study in order to understand the epistemic tensions within paleontology surrounding Darwin’s theory as well as the variety of non-Darwinian alternatives that emerged from the statistical treatment of the fossil record at the end of the 19th century.
...More
Article
Brice, William R.;
(2004)
Henry Shaler Williams (1847--1918) and Punctuated Equilibiria
(/isis/citation/CBB000502282/)
Article
Olivia Murphy;
(2017)
“A Future to Look Forward to?”: Extinction and Evolution in Jane Austen's Persuasion
(/isis/citation/CBB855297374/)
Article
Brinkman, Paul D.;
(2010)
Charles Darwin's Beagle Voyage, Fossil Vertebrate Succession, and “The Gradual Birth and Death of Species”
(/isis/citation/CBB001022369/)
Article
Chris Manias;
(2017)
Progress in life's history: Linking Darwinism and palaeontology in Britain, 1860–1914
(/isis/citation/CBB426710736/)
Book
Benton, Ted;
(2013)
Alfred Russel Wallace: Explorer, Evolutionist, Public Intellectual - a Thinker for Our Own Times?
(/isis/citation/CBB001202298/)
Thesis
Varno, Theodore James;
(2011)
The Nature of Tomorrow: Inbreeding in Industrial Agriculture and Evolutionary Thought in Britain and the United States, 1859--1925
(/isis/citation/CBB001567261/)
Book
Aczel, Amir D.;
(2007)
Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin, Evolution and the Search for Peking Man
(/isis/citation/CBB000830479/)
Book
Brzezinski Prestes, Maria Elice;
Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira;
Stefano, Waldir;
(2006)
Filosofia e História da Biologia 1
(/isis/citation/CBB000820181/)
Article
R. Bruce Mcmillan;
(2023)
Albert Koch’s Hydrarchos: A Hoax or A Bona Fide Collection of Bones
(/isis/citation/CBB354774746/)
Book
Sepkoski, David;
(2012)
Rereading the Fossil Record: The Growth of Paleobiology as an Evolutionary Discipline
(/isis/citation/CBB001210043/)
Book
Emling, Shelley;
(2009)
The Fossil Hunter: Dinosaurs, Evolution, and the Woman Whose Discoveries Changed the World
(/isis/citation/CBB001031283/)
Article
James G. Lennox;
(2021)
Accentuate the negative: Locating possibility in Darwin’s ‘long argument’
(/isis/citation/CBB202149987/)
Chapter
Wilmer, Clive;
(2013)
“No Such Thing as a Flower […] No Such Thing as a Man”: John Ruskin's Response to Darwin
(/isis/citation/CBB001422077/)
Thesis
Michael Dee;
(2016)
Roots of Charles Darwin's Creativity
(/isis/citation/CBB344704069/)
Article
Chancellor, Gordon;
(2015)
Levels of Selection in Darwin's Origin of Species
(/isis/citation/CBB001510219/)
Book
Levine, George Lewis;
(2006)
Darwin Loves You: Natural Selection and the Re-enchantment of the World
(/isis/citation/CBB000772748/)
Article
Bowler, Peter J.;
(2008)
What Darwin Disturbed: The Biology That Might Have Been
(/isis/citation/CBB000850417/)
Book
Donohue, Kathleen;
(2011)
Darwin's Finches: Readings in the Evolution of a Scientific Paradigm
(/isis/citation/CBB001033158/)
Article
Beer, Gillian;
(2009)
Darwin and the Uses of Extinction
(/isis/citation/CBB001030096/)
Chapter
Sloan, Phillip R.;
(2001)
“The Sense of Sublimity”: Darwin on Nature and Divinity
(/isis/citation/CBB000101144/)
Be the first to comment!