In technoscientific conditions what counts as knowledge creation is not primarily the individual experimental achievement that gives coherence to scientific practice and separates science from its publics; rather, it is a form of dispersed experimentation in more than human worlds: distributed invention power. Distributed invention power is organised and regulated through the pervasive securitisation of technoscience: surveillance and control of technoscientific fields as well as financialisation of its activities and research outputs. The securitisation of science reorders the traditional split between the public sphere, the private sector and the commons. The folding of each one of these spheres into the other underlies a constant, often antagonistic, oscillation between big science and open science. What is constitutive of the diverse movements that sustain open technoscience is not that they challenge technoscience as such but that they experiment with technoscience to create alternative forms of life.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Frank N. Laird;
(2020)
Sticky Policies, Dysfunctional Systems: Path Dependency and the Problems of Government Funding for Science in the United States
(/isis/citation/CBB444679505/)
Article
Chee, Liz P. Y.;
Clancey, Gregory;
(2013)
The Human Proteome and the Chinese Liver
(/isis/citation/CBB001201764/)
Book
Christopher Lawrence;
(2013)
Rockefeller Money, the Laboratory and Medicine in Edinburgh 1919-1930: New Science in an Old Country
(/isis/citation/CBB361418066/)
Book
Mark Solovey;
(2020)
Social Science for What?: Battles over Public Funding for the "Other Sciences" at the National Science Foundation
(/isis/citation/CBB950238763/)
Article
William Rankin;
(June 2017)
Zombie projects, negative networks, and multigenerational science: The temporality of the International Map of the World
(/isis/citation/CBB691803189/)
Article
Gian Marco Campagnolo;
(2022)
How to Win Games and Influence Football Players
(/isis/citation/CBB623779608/)
Article
Lambros Roumbanis;
(2019)
Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants
(/isis/citation/CBB181098680/)
Article
Axel Philipps;
Leonie Weißenborn;
(December 2019)
Unconventional ideas conventionally arranged: A study of grant proposals for exceptional research
(/isis/citation/CBB907320584/)
Article
Sergio Sismondo;
(December 2019)
Academic Lives and Cultures
(/isis/citation/CBB500921335/)
Article
Kean Birch;
(2023)
Reflexive expectations in innovation financing: An analysis of venture capital as a mode of valuation
(/isis/citation/CBB876475429/)
Article
David Reinecke;
(October 2021)
When funding fails: Planetary exploration at NASA in an era of austerity, 1967–1976
(/isis/citation/CBB136979511/)
Article
Coleen Carrigan;
Saejin Kwak Tanguay;
Joyce Yen;
Julie Simmons Ivy;
Cara Margherio;
M. Claire Horner-Devine;
Eve A. Riskin;
Christine S. Grant;
(2023)
Negotiating boundaries: an intersectional collaboration to advance women academics in engineering
(/isis/citation/CBB975394998/)
Article
Felicitas Hesselmann;
Martin Reinhart;
(June 2021)
Cycles of invisibility: The limits of transparency in dealing with scientific misconduct
(/isis/citation/CBB357048923/)
Article
Paige L Sweet;
Danielle Giffort;
(June 2021)
The bad expert
(/isis/citation/CBB216520442/)
Article
Alessandro Delfanti;
(April 2021)
The financial market of ideas: A theory of academic social media
(/isis/citation/CBB276472210/)
Article
Christiane Wilke;
(November 2017)
Seeing and Unmaking Civilians in Afghanistan: Visual Technologies and Contested Professional Visions
(/isis/citation/CBB113464170/)
Article
Sarah R Davies;
(April 2021)
Atmospheres of science: Experiencing scientific mobility
(/isis/citation/CBB225400263/)
Article
Julian Hamann;
(December 2019)
The Making of Professors: Assessment and Recognition in Academic Recruitment
(/isis/citation/CBB018543263/)
Article
Kacey Beddoes;
(2021)
Examining Privilege in Engineering Socialization Through the Stories of Newcomer Engineers
(/isis/citation/CBB981184504/)
Article
Owen Marshall;
(2020)
Shibboleths in the studio: Informal demarcation practices among audio engineers
(/isis/citation/CBB736386887/)
Be the first to comment!