Chevassus-au-Louis, Nicolas (Author)
Elliott, Nicholas (Translator)
From a journalist and former lab researcher, a penetrating investigation of the explosion in cases of scientific fraud and the factors behind it.In the 1970s, a scientific scandal about painted mice hit the headlines. A cancer researcher was found to have deliberately falsified his experiments by coloring transplanted mouse skin with ink. This widely publicized case of scientific misconduct marked the beginning of an epidemic of fraud that plagues the scientific community today.From manipulated results and made-up data to retouched illustrations and plagiarism, cases of scientific fraud have skyrocketed in the past two decades, especially in the biomedical sciences. Fraud in the Lab examines cases of scientific misconduct around the world and asks why this behavior is so pervasive. Nicolas Chevassus-au-Louis points to large-scale trends that have led to an environment of heightened competition, extreme self-interest, and emphasis on short-term payoffs. Because of the move toward highly specialized research, fewer experts are qualified to verify experimental findings. And the pace of journal publishing has exacerbated the scientific rewards system―publish or perish holds sway more than ever. Even when instances of misconduct are discovered, researchers often face few consequences, and falsified data may continue to circulate after an article has been retracted.Sharp and damning, this exposé details the circumstances that have allowed scientific standards to decline. Fraud in the Lab reveals the intense social pressures that lead to fraud, documents the lasting impact it has had on the scientific community, and highlights recent initiatives and proposals to reduce the extent of misconduct in the future.
...MoreReview Olivier Leclerc (2023) Review of "Fraud in the Lab: The High Stakes of Scientific Research". Metascience: An International Review Journal for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science (pp. 249-252).
Article
Marie-Andrée Jacob;
(February 2019)
Under repair: A publication ethics and research record in the making
(/isis/citation/CBB050139593/)
Article
Lene Koch;
Mette N. Svendsen;
(May 2015)
Negotiating Moral Value: A Story of Danish Research Monkeys and Their Humans
(/isis/citation/CBB281898023/)
Article
Todd M Olszewski;
(2018)
Between Bench and Bedside: Building Clinical Consensus at the NIH, 1977–2013
(/isis/citation/CBB649225500/)
Article
Myungsim Kim;
Jongyoung Kim;
Hee-Je Bak;
(June 2018)
Between Fraud and Hope: Stem Cell Research in Korea after the Hwang Affair
(/isis/citation/CBB514852734/)
Article
Lissa L. Roberts;
H. Otto Sibum;
Cyrus C. M. Mody;
(2020)
Integrating the history of science into broader discussions of research integrity and fraud
(/isis/citation/CBB863361732/)
Article
Hong, Sungook;
(2008)
The Hwang Scandal that “Shook the World of Science”
(/isis/citation/CBB000930692/)
Thesis
Keranen, Lisa;
(2003)
Science and Self-Defense: Rhetoric, Politics, and Personae in the Bernard Fisher Breast Cancer Research Controversy
(/isis/citation/CBB001562015/)
Book
Volker Roelcke;
Sascha Topp;
Etienne Lepicard;
(2014)
Silence, Scapegoats, Self-Reflection: The Shadow of Nazi Medical Crimes on Medicine and Bioethics
(/isis/citation/CBB361728556/)
Article
Beth Greenhough;
Emma Roe;
(July 2018)
Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector
(/isis/citation/CBB661318783/)
Article
Hallam Stevens;
(2018)
Starting up Biology in China: Performances of Life at BGI
(/isis/citation/CBB133037526/)
Article
Morgan Meyer;
(2022)
Taking responsibility, making irresponsibility: Controversies in human gene editing
(/isis/citation/CBB072011815/)
Article
Peter Keating;
Alberto Cambrosio;
Nicole C. Nelson;
(2016)
“Triple negative breast cancer”: Translational research and the (re)assembling of diseases in post-genomic medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB354121073/)
Article
Clay Davis;
(December 2020)
Homo adhaerens: Risk and adherence in biomedical HIV prevention research
(/isis/citation/CBB559629478/)
Article
Stephen M. Davies;
(2019)
Rothschild Reversed: Explaining the Exceptionalism of Biomedical Research, 1971–1981
(/isis/citation/CBB964513170/)
Article
Normark, Daniel;
(2015)
Flexibility or Inexactitude? The “Lab 60” at Karolinska Institutet: From Medical Disciplines towards the Modern Biomedical Complex
(/isis/citation/CBB001551185/)
Article
Lisa Lindén;
(July 2021)
Moving Evidence: Patients’ Groups, Biomedical Research, and Affects
(/isis/citation/CBB080289080/)
Article
Laurel Smith-Doerr;
Itai Vardi;
(March 2015)
Mind the Gap: Formal Ethics Policies and Chemical Scientists’ Everyday Practices in Academia and Industry
(/isis/citation/CBB114416720/)
Article
Sebastian Ureta;
(January 2021)
Ruination Science: Producing Knowledge from a Toxic World
(/isis/citation/CBB500426002/)
Article
Sandra Calkins;
(October 2021)
Toxic remains: Infrastructural failure in a Ugandan molecular biology lab
(/isis/citation/CBB094400545/)
Article
Jennifer S. Singh;
(Marvh 2015)
Narratives of Participation in Autism Genetics Research
(/isis/citation/CBB713757349/)
Be the first to comment!