Book ID: CBB560734834

Fraud in the Lab: The High Stakes of Scientific Research (2019)

unapi

From a journalist and former lab researcher, a penetrating investigation of the explosion in cases of scientific fraud and the factors behind it.In the 1970s, a scientific scandal about painted mice hit the headlines. A cancer researcher was found to have deliberately falsified his experiments by coloring transplanted mouse skin with ink. This widely publicized case of scientific misconduct marked the beginning of an epidemic of fraud that plagues the scientific community today.From manipulated results and made-up data to retouched illustrations and plagiarism, cases of scientific fraud have skyrocketed in the past two decades, especially in the biomedical sciences. Fraud in the Lab examines cases of scientific misconduct around the world and asks why this behavior is so pervasive. Nicolas Chevassus-au-Louis points to large-scale trends that have led to an environment of heightened competition, extreme self-interest, and emphasis on short-term payoffs. Because of the move toward highly specialized research, fewer experts are qualified to verify experimental findings. And the pace of journal publishing has exacerbated the scientific rewards system―publish or perish holds sway more than ever. Even when instances of misconduct are discovered, researchers often face few consequences, and falsified data may continue to circulate after an article has been retracted.Sharp and damning, this exposé details the circumstances that have allowed scientific standards to decline. Fraud in the Lab reveals the intense social pressures that lead to fraud, documents the lasting impact it has had on the scientific community, and highlights recent initiatives and proposals to reduce the extent of misconduct in the future.

...More
Reviewed By

Review Olivier Leclerc (2023) Review of "Fraud in the Lab: The High Stakes of Scientific Research". Metascience: An International Review Journal for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science (pp. 249-252). unapi

Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB560734834/

Similar Citations

Article Marie-Andrée Jacob; (February 2019)
Under repair: A publication ethics and research record in the making (/isis/citation/CBB050139593/)

Article Lene Koch; Mette N. Svendsen; (May 2015)
Negotiating Moral Value: A Story of Danish Research Monkeys and Their Humans (/isis/citation/CBB281898023/)

Article Todd M Olszewski; (2018)
Between Bench and Bedside: Building Clinical Consensus at the NIH, 1977–2013 (/isis/citation/CBB649225500/)

Article Myungsim Kim; Jongyoung Kim; Hee-Je Bak; (June 2018)
Between Fraud and Hope: Stem Cell Research in Korea after the Hwang Affair (/isis/citation/CBB514852734/)

Article Lissa L. Roberts; H. Otto Sibum; Cyrus C. M. Mody; (2020)
Integrating the history of science into broader discussions of research integrity and fraud (/isis/citation/CBB863361732/)

Article Hong, Sungook; (2008)
The Hwang Scandal that “Shook the World of Science” (/isis/citation/CBB000930692/)

Book Volker Roelcke; Sascha Topp; Etienne Lepicard; (2014)
Silence, Scapegoats, Self-Reflection: The Shadow of Nazi Medical Crimes on Medicine and Bioethics (/isis/citation/CBB361728556/)

Article Hallam Stevens; (2018)
Starting up Biology in China: Performances of Life at BGI (/isis/citation/CBB133037526/)

Article Morgan Meyer; (2022)
Taking responsibility, making irresponsibility: Controversies in human gene editing (/isis/citation/CBB072011815/)

Article Peter Keating; Alberto Cambrosio; Nicole C. Nelson; (2016)
“Triple negative breast cancer”: Translational research and the (re)assembling of diseases in post-genomic medicine (/isis/citation/CBB354121073/)

Article Clay Davis; (December 2020)
Homo adhaerens: Risk and adherence in biomedical HIV prevention research (/isis/citation/CBB559629478/)

Article Stephen M. Davies; (2019)
Rothschild Reversed: Explaining the Exceptionalism of Biomedical Research, 1971–1981 (/isis/citation/CBB964513170/)

Article Lisa Lindén; (July 2021)
Moving Evidence: Patients’ Groups, Biomedical Research, and Affects (/isis/citation/CBB080289080/)

Article Laurel Smith-Doerr; Itai Vardi; (March 2015)
Mind the Gap: Formal Ethics Policies and Chemical Scientists’ Everyday Practices in Academia and Industry (/isis/citation/CBB114416720/)

Article Sebastian Ureta; (January 2021)
Ruination Science: Producing Knowledge from a Toxic World (/isis/citation/CBB500426002/)

Article Sandra Calkins; (October 2021)
Toxic remains: Infrastructural failure in a Ugandan molecular biology lab (/isis/citation/CBB094400545/)

Article Jennifer S. Singh; (Marvh 2015)
Narratives of Participation in Autism Genetics Research (/isis/citation/CBB713757349/)

Authors & Contributors
Lisa Lindén
Jacob, Marie-Andrée
Greenhough, Beth
Sandra Calkins
Kim, Myungsim
Davies, Stephen M.
Journals
Science, Technology and Human Values
Social Studies of Science
East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Osiris: A Research Journal Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences
Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences
Publishers
V&R Unipress
University of Pittsburgh
Concepts
Research
Biomedicine
Ethics
Technoscience; science and technology studies
Laboratories
Scientific misconduct; fraud in science
People
Hwang, Woo-suk
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
Places
Sweden
Korea
Great Britain
Shenzhen (China)
Uganda
United States
Institutions
华大基因 (Beijing Institute of Genomics)
Committee on Publication Ethics
Stockholm. Karolinska Mediko-Kirurgiska Institutet
National Institute of Health (U.S.)
Medical Research Council (Great Britain)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment