“[A]n der Front des Kampfes um den Menschen selbst”. Anthropogenetics and Anthropotechnics in Soviet Thought. The period between 1920 and 1930 reveals in Russia a practical manifestation of the technologies of the self, which see the body not only in a poetic-symbolical way, but practically as a material of shaping and rebuilding. In this bio-social discourse of a genetically perfected ‘new man’, Russian theorists of eugenics are looking back on traditional parallels of animal and plant breeding. The most influential group of eugenics were the Russian biologists, especially the key players and the founders of the Russian genetics research Nikolai Kol′tsov (1872–1940) and Aleksandr Serebrovskii (1892–1948). It will be demonstrated that ‘human breeding’ (Russ. ‘Antropotekhnika’) is based both on the semantics and on the methodology of traditional animal and plant breeding.
...More
Article
Gall, Yasha M.;
Konashev, Mikhail B.;
(2001)
The Discovery of Gramicidin S: The Intellectual Transformation of G. F. Gause from Biologist to Researcher of Antibiotics and on Its Meaning for the Fate of Russian Genetics
(/isis/citation/CBB000770067/)
Book
Pringle, Peter;
(2008)
The Murder of Nikolai Vavilov: The Story of Stalin's Persecution of One of the Great Scientists of the Twentieth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB001232480/)
Article
Braund, James;
Sutton, Douglas G.;
(2008)
The Case of Heinrich Wilhelm Poll (1877--1939): A German-Jewish Geneticist, Eugenicist, Twin Researcher, and Victim of the Nazis
(/isis/citation/CBB000774208/)
Book
Amir Teicher;
(2019)
Social Mendelism: Genetics and the Politics of Race in Germany, 1900-1948
(/isis/citation/CBB585433440/)
Book
Currell, Susan;
Cogdell, Christina;
(2006)
Popular Eugenics: National Efficiency and American Mass Culture in the 1930s
(/isis/citation/CBB000774027/)
Article
Mikhail Konashev;
(2020)
Soviet Genetics and the Communist Party: Was It All Bad and Wrong, or None at All?
(/isis/citation/CBB689195305/)
Article
Margaret Peacock;
(2015)
Mendel Lives: The Survival of Mendelian Genetics in the Lysenkoist Classroom, 1937–1964
(/isis/citation/CBB127467717/)
Article
Wolfe, Audra J.;
(2010)
What Does It Mean to Go Public? The American Response to Lysenkoism, Reconsidered
(/isis/citation/CBB001022644/)
Article
Michael D. Gordin;
(2018)
Lysenko Unemployed: Soviet Genetics after the Aftermath
(/isis/citation/CBB722203405/)
Article
Hirofumi Saito;
(2021)
International Genetics Symposia in Tokyo and Kyoto 1956: A Case of Communication between Japanese Mendelian Geneticists and a Soviet Michurinist Delegation
(/isis/citation/CBB388625775/)
Article
Roll-Hansen, Nils;
(2005)
The Lysenko Effect: Undermining the Autonomy of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000630797/)
Article
Soyfer, Valery N.;
(2011)
Stalin and Fighters against Cellular Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB001220383/)
Book
Roll-Hansen, Nils;
(2005)
The Lysenko Effect: The Politics of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000501469/)
Article
Köhler, Piotr;
(2011)
Botany and Lysenkoism in Poland
(/isis/citation/CBB001220380/)
Book
Strick, James E.;
(2015)
Wilhelm Reich, Biologist
(/isis/citation/CBB001510003/)
Book
Weiss, Sheila Faith;
(2010)
The Nazi Symbiosis: Human Genetics and Politics in the Third Reich
(/isis/citation/CBB001033360/)
Book
Müller-Wille, Staffan;
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg;
(2012)
A Cultural History of Heredity
(/isis/citation/CBB001251195/)
Article
Volker Roelcke;
(2019)
Eugenic concerns, scientific practices: international relations in the establishment of psychiatric genetics in Germany, Britain, the USA and Scandinavia, c.1910–60
(/isis/citation/CBB353961997/)
Article
Davide Battisti;
(2019)
Genome editing: slipping down toward Eugenics?
(/isis/citation/CBB945724739/)
Book
Subramaniam, Banu;
(2014)
Ghost Stories for Darwin. The Science of Variation and the Politics of Diversity
(/isis/citation/CBB001500575/)
Be the first to comment!