JafariNaimi, Nassim (Author)
The discourse around self-driving cars has been dominated by an emphasis on their potential to reduce the number of accidents. At the same time, proponents acknowledge that self-driving cars would inevitably be involved in fatal accidents where moral algorithms would decide the fate of those involved. This is a necessary trade-off, proponents suggest, in order to reap the benefits of this new technology. In this article, I engage this argument, demonstrating how an undue optimism and enthusiasm about this technology is obscuring our ability to see what is at stake and explaining how moving beyond the dominant utilitarian framings around this technology opens up a space for both ethical inquiry and innovative design. I suggest that a genuine caring concern for the many lives lost in car accidents now and in the future—a concern that transcends false binary trade-offs and that recognizes the systemic biases and power structures that make certain groups more vulnerable than others—could serve as a starting point to rethink mobility, as it connects to the design of our cities, the well-being of our communities, and the future of our planet.
...More
Article
Amy Adams Quark;
(2019)
Outsourcing Regulatory Decision-making: “International” Epistemic Communities, Transnational Firms, and Pesticide Residue Standards in India
Article
Jenny Andersson;
Erik Westholm;
(2019)
Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders
Article
Akos Kokai;
Alastair Iles;
Christine Meisner Rosen;
(November 2021)
Green Design Tools: Building Values and Politics into Material Choices
Article
Rebecca A. Adelman;
(May 2018)
Security Glitches: The Failure of the Universal Camouflage Pattern and the Fantasy of “Identity Intelligence”
Article
Kris Hartley;
(November 2021)
Public Trust and Political Legitimacy in the Smart City: A Reckoning for Technocracy
Article
Ruha Benjamin;
(November 2016)
Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-based Bioethics
Article
Malte Ziewitz;
(January 2016)
Governing Algorithms: Myth, Mess, and Methods
Article
Krishna Sood;
(June 2018)
The Ultimate Black Box: The Thorny Issue of Programming Moral Standards in Machines
Article
Sabine Roeser;
Udo Pesch;
(March 2016)
An Emotional Deliberation Approach to Risk
Article
Erin A. Cech;
Anneke Metz;
Jessie L. Smith;
Karen deVries;
(September 2017)
Epistemological Dominance and Social Inequality: Experiences of Native American Science, Engineering, and Health Students
Article
Roderic N. Crooks;
(2019)
Times Thirty: Access, Maintenance, and Justice
Article
Maria do Mar Pereira;
(2019)
Boundary-work that Does Not Work: Social Inequalities and the Non-performativity of Scientific Boundary-work
Article
Barbara L. Allen;
(November 2018)
Strongly Participatory Science and Knowledge Justice in an Environmentally Contested Region
Article
Arne Pollock;
Banu Subramaniam;
(November 2016)
Introduction to Special Issue: Resisting Power, Retooling Justice: Promises of Feminist Postcolonial Technosciences
Article
Chris Tennant;
Jack Stilgoe;
(December 2021)
The attachments of ‘autonomous’ vehicles
Article
Marion Hourdequin;
(2019)
Geoengineering Justice: The Role of Recognition
Article
Allain J. Barnett;
Melanie G. Wiber;
(2019)
What Scientists Say about the Changing Risk Calculation in the Marine Environment under the Harper Government of Canada (2006-2015)
Article
Carmen McLeod;
Sarah Hartley;
(July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance
Article
Natalie B. Aviles;
(September 2018)
Situated Practice and the Emergence of Ethical Research: HPV Vaccine Development and Organizational Cultures of Translation at the National Cancer Institute
Article
Allison Loconto;
Scott Prudham;
Steven Wolf;
(2024)
Environmental governance through metrics: Guest introduction
Be the first to comment!