Article ID: CBB556129964

Our Bodies in the Trolley’s Path, or Why Self-driving Cars Must *Not* Be Programmed to Kill (March 2018)

unapi

The discourse around self-driving cars has been dominated by an emphasis on their potential to reduce the number of accidents. At the same time, proponents acknowledge that self-driving cars would inevitably be involved in fatal accidents where moral algorithms would decide the fate of those involved. This is a necessary trade-off, proponents suggest, in order to reap the benefits of this new technology. In this article, I engage this argument, demonstrating how an undue optimism and enthusiasm about this technology is obscuring our ability to see what is at stake and explaining how moving beyond the dominant utilitarian framings around this technology opens up a space for both ethical inquiry and innovative design. I suggest that a genuine caring concern for the many lives lost in car accidents now and in the future—a concern that transcends false binary trade-offs and that recognizes the systemic biases and power structures that make certain groups more vulnerable than others—could serve as a starting point to rethink mobility, as it connects to the design of our cities, the well-being of our communities, and the future of our planet.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB556129964/

Similar Citations

Article Jenny Andersson; Erik Westholm; (2019)
Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders (/isis/citation/CBB589179620/)

Article Akos Kokai; Alastair Iles; Christine Meisner Rosen; (November 2021)
Green Design Tools: Building Values and Politics into Material Choices (/isis/citation/CBB745455255/)

Article Kris Hartley; (November 2021)
Public Trust and Political Legitimacy in the Smart City: A Reckoning for Technocracy (/isis/citation/CBB172268665/)

Article Malte Ziewitz; (January 2016)
Governing Algorithms: Myth, Mess, and Methods (/isis/citation/CBB061486372/)

Article Ruha Benjamin; (November 2016)
Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-based Bioethics (/isis/citation/CBB856025239/)

Article Erin A. Cech; Anneke Metz; Jessie L. Smith; Karen deVries; (September 2017)
Epistemological Dominance and Social Inequality: Experiences of Native American Science, Engineering, and Health Students (/isis/citation/CBB816459691/)

Article Krishna Sood; (June 2018)
The Ultimate Black Box: The Thorny Issue of Programming Moral Standards in Machines (/isis/citation/CBB475729971/)

Article Barbara L. Allen; (November 2018)
Strongly Participatory Science and Knowledge Justice in an Environmentally Contested Region (/isis/citation/CBB069762669/)

Article Sabine Roeser; Udo Pesch; (March 2016)
An Emotional Deliberation Approach to Risk (/isis/citation/CBB657243437/)

Article Chris Tennant; Jack Stilgoe; (December 2021)
The attachments of ‘autonomous’ vehicles (/isis/citation/CBB202538969/)

Article Roderic N. Crooks; (2019)
Times Thirty: Access, Maintenance, and Justice (/isis/citation/CBB487672024/)

Article Arne Pollock; Banu Subramaniam; (November 2016)
Introduction to Special Issue: Resisting Power, Retooling Justice: Promises of Feminist Postcolonial Technosciences (/isis/citation/CBB706070191/)

Article Allison Loconto; Scott Prudham; Steven Wolf; (2024)
Environmental governance through metrics: guest introduction (/isis/citation/CBB894684908/)

Article Emmanuel Henry; (September 2021)
Governing Occupational Exposure Using Thresholds: A Policy Biased Toward Industry (/isis/citation/CBB676852860/)

Article Mattia Andreoletti; David Teira; (2019)
Rules versus Standards: What Are the Costs of Epistemic Norms in Drug Regulation? (/isis/citation/CBB881753075/)

Article Natasha D. Schüll; (March 2022)
Afterword: Shifting the Terms of the Debate (/isis/citation/CBB889022961/)

Article Emmanuel Henry; Valentin Thomas; Sara Angeli Aguiton; Marc-Olivier Déplaude; Nathalie Jas; (September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation (/isis/citation/CBB736985993/)

Authors & Contributors
Henry, Emmanuel
Prudham, Scott
deVries, Karen
Chris Tennant
Pereira, Maria do Mar
Cech, Erin A.
Concepts
Technoscience; science and technology studies
Power (social sciences)
Governance
Justice
Equality
Science and politics
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
Places
United States
Hong Kong
Sweden
Portugal
France
China
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment