On which philosophical foundations is the attribution of numerical magnitudes to qualitative phenomena based? That is, what is the philosophical basis for attributing, through measurement operations, numbers to empirical qualities that our senses perceive in the outside world? This question, nowadays rarely addressed in such a way, actually refers to an old debate about the quantification of qualities. A historical analysis reveals that it was a major issue in the “context of discovery” of the first attempts to mathematize new fields of knowledge, whereas the “context of justification” leading our contemporary perspective on such episodes often overlooks such problems. As a consequence, little attention has so far been given to tracing its emergence back to its original context, leaving in the shadows an important debate about measurement. In this respect, the work of William Stanley Jevons is worth analysis. As a preliminary step toward his ambitious project to mathematize economics, he first attempted to understand the mechanism underlying measurement in physics, through a very innovative approach. Its main merit consisted in trying to overcome the Aristotelian distinction between quantities and qualities. In this article, I will strive to highlight the significance of his work for the history of philosophy of science.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Chapter
Heck, Richard;
(2010)
Frege and Semantics
(/isis/citation/CBB001211655/)
Article
Heis, Jeremy;
(2010)
“Critical Philosophy Begins at the Very Point Where Logistic Leaves Off”: Cassirer's Response to Frege and Russell
(/isis/citation/CBB001034595/)
Book
Philip A. Ebert;
Marcus Rossberg;
(2017)
Abstractionism: Essays in Philosophy of Mathematics
(/isis/citation/CBB220910667/)
Article
Korhonen, Anssi;
(2012)
Logic as a Science and Logic as a Theory: Remarks on Frege, Russell and the Logocentric Predicament
(/isis/citation/CBB001214125/)
Article
Charis Charalampous;
(2021)
The Confined Atom: James Clerk Maxwell on the Fundamental Particles and the Limits of Scientific Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB959157856/)
Article
Louis Caruana;
(2018)
Mechanistic Trends in Chemistry
(/isis/citation/CBB703605057/)
Article
Hiroshi Ichikawa;
(2019)
Materialist Perestroika of Quantum Dynamics and Soviet Ideology: Yakov Petrovich Terletskii (1912‒1993)
(/isis/citation/CBB251482593/)
Book
Alexandre Guay;
Thomas Pradeu;
(2015)
Individuals Across the Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB012397496/)
Book
Schuster, John;
(2013)
Descartes-Agonistes: Physico-Mathematics, Method and Corpuscular-Mechanism 1618--33
(/isis/citation/CBB001500367/)
Essay Review
Michael R. Matthews;
(2016)
Mario Bunge: A Long and Productive Life
(/isis/citation/CBB944245974/)
Article
Sonia Maria Dion;
(2018)
Natural Classification and Pierre Duhem's Historical Work: Which Relationships?
(/isis/citation/CBB874044967/)
Article
Rinat Magdievich Nugayev;
(2016)
Maxwellian Electrodynamics Genesis and Development: Intertheoretic Context
(/isis/citation/CBB895974945/)
Book
David S. Sytsma;
(2017)
Richard Baxter and the Mechanical Philosophers
(/isis/citation/CBB825569082/)
Article
Adam Tamas Tuboly;
(2020)
Knowledge Missemination: L. Susan Stebbing, C.E.M. Joad, and Philipp Frank on the Philosophy of the Physicists
(/isis/citation/CBB985127853/)
Chapter
Massimo Ferrari;
(2018)
“Uno strenuo difensore” di Mach: John Bernhard Stallo
(/isis/citation/CBB213065857/)
Chapter
Luca Guidetti;
(2018)
Il problema dell'analogia in Ernst Mach
(/isis/citation/CBB358140394/)
Article
Biard, Joël;
(2004)
Le rôle des condamnations de 1277 dans le développment de la physique selon Pierre Duhem
(/isis/citation/CBB000551112/)
Chapter
Thomas Mormann;
(2015)
From Mathematics to Quantum Mechanics – On the Conceptual Unity of Cassirer's Philosophy of Science (1907–1937)
(/isis/citation/CBB281633633/)
Chapter
Salvo D'Agostino;
(2009)
Einstein: la scienza come autocritica
(/isis/citation/CBB537435671/)
Chapter
Cheng, Yinghong;
(2013)
Ideology and Cosmology: Maoist Discussion on Physics and the Cultural Revolution
(/isis/citation/CBB001320722/)
Be the first to comment!