Nina Frahm (Author)
Tess Doezema (Author)
Sebastian Pfotenhauer (Author)
Long presented as a universal policy-recipe for social prosperity and economic growth, the promise of innovation seems to be increasingly in question, giving way to a new vision of progress in which society is advanced as a central enabler of technoeconomic development. Frameworks such as “Responsible” or “Mission-oriented” Innovation, for example, have become commonplace parlance and practice in the governance of the innovation–society nexus. In this paper, we study the dynamics by which this “social fix” to technoscience has gained legitimacy in institutions of global governance by investigating recent projects at two international organizations, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the European Commission, to mainstream “Responsible Innovation” frameworks and instruments across countries. Our analysis shows how the turn to societal participation in both organizations relies on a new deficit logic—a democratic deficit of innovation—that frames a lack of societal engagement in innovation governance as a major barrier to the uptake and dissemination of new technologies. These deficit politics enable global governance institutions to present “Responsible Innovation” frameworks as the solution and to claim authority over the coproduction of particular forms of democracy and innovation as intertwined pillars of a market-liberal international order.
...More
Article
Deborah Scott;
(2023)
Diversifying the Deliberative Turn: Toward an Agonistic RRI
Article
Yevgeniya Tomkiv;
Astrid Liland;
Deborah H. Oughton;
Brian Wynne;
(2017)
Assessing Quality of Stakeholder Engagement: From Bureaucracy to Democracy
Article
Samuel Ducourant;
(2023)
Science or Ignorance of Animal Welfare? A Case Study: Scientific Reports Published in Preparation for the First European Directive on Animal Welfare (1979-1980)
Article
Jakob Raffn;
Frederik Lassen;
(2021)
Politics of Nature: The board game
Article
Carmen McLeod;
Sarah Hartley;
(July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance
Article
Luciana Landgraf Castelo Branco;
(2023)
Rethinking governance through Samarco’s dam collapse in Brazil: a critique from the STS perspective
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
(September 2021)
Governing Occupational Exposure Using Thresholds: A Policy Biased Toward Industry
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
Valentin Thomas;
Sara Angeli Aguiton;
Marc-Olivier Déplaude;
Nathalie Jas;
(September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation
Article
Beth Greenhough;
Emma Roe;
(July 2018)
Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector
Article
Monamie Bhadra Haines;
(February 2019)
Contested credibility economies of nuclear power in India
Article
Hiro Saito;
(January 2021)
The Developmental State and Public Participation: The Case of Energy Policy-making in Post–Fukushima Japan
Article
Christian Ross;
(2022)
Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing
Article
Durant, Darrin;
(October 2011)
Models of democracy in social studies of science
Article
Bloomfield, Brian P.;
Doolin, Bill;
(February 2011)
Imagination and technoscientific innovations: Governance of transgenic cows in New Zealand
Chapter
Fujigaki, Yuko;
(2019)
Lessons from Fukushima for Responsible Innovation: How to Construct a New Relationship Between Science and Society?
Article
Caitlin Donahue Wylie;
(March 2018)
Trust in Technicians in Paleontology Laboratories
Article
Arapostathis, Stathis;
Léonard Laborie;
(January 2020)
Governing Technosciences in the Age of Grand Challenges: A European Historical Perspective on the Entanglement of Science, Technology, Diplomacy, and Democracy
Article
Robert G. W. Kirk;
(July 2018)
Recovering The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique: The 3Rs and the Human Essence of Animal Research
Article
Ashlyn Jaeger;
(2019)
(Re)Producing Cyborgs: Biomedicalizing Abortion through the Congressional Debate over Fetal Pain
Chapter
Brice Laurent;
(2019)
Innovation for Whom? City Experiments and the Redefinition of Urban Democracy
Be the first to comment!