IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB546323901

Cosmopolitics of a Regulatory Fit: The Case of Nanocellulose (2019)

Kautto, Petrus (Author)
Valve, Helena (Author)

Science as Culture
Volume: 28
Issue: 1
Pages: 25-45

URI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2018.1533935

DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2018.1533935

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Nanocellulose is an organic material envisioned to have the capacity to replace potentially harmful, non-renewable materials such as plastics. Before the material can be utilized commercially within the EU, its safety needs to be officially proven. This is envisioned to happen through the REACH chemicals regulation that controls the market entry of new substances. The regulation proposes concepts to support regulatory discretion and test methods to be used in risk assessments. While so doing, REACH puts forward assumptions pertaining to the critical qualities of innovations. However, when regulation is used to appraise radically new innovations, the assumptions need to be re-evaluated. Yet, analysis of expert accounts suggests that nanocellulose cannot be easily fit into the categorizations and analytical engagements that REACH proposes. For the purposes of a regulatory adoption, the problems are transformed into epistemological issues to be resolved through the incremental closing of knowledge gaps. Some of the key qualities of the material seem not to gain recognition in the regulatory realm that is in the making. At worst, the official strategy may create conditions for risks which the regulation is supposed to eradicate while, at the same time, hindering the development of plastic-substituting solutions.

...More

Citation URI

http://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB546323901/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Nerea Calvillo; (June 2018)
Political airs: From monitoring to attuned sensing air pollution (/isis/citation/CBB938785365/)

Article Thomas A. Hemphill; (2016)
Regulating Nanomaterials: A Case for Hybrid Governance (/isis/citation/CBB954604545/)

Article Hindmarsh, Richard; Gottweis, Herbert; (2005)
Recombinant Regulation: The Asilomar Legacy 30 Years On (/isis/citation/CBB000640400/)

Article Rita Giuffredi; (2016)
La transizione dall’«Europa della conoscenza» all’«Unione dell’Innovazione» nella politica della ricerca europea (/isis/citation/CBB286815072/)

Article Vail, David D.; (2012)
Kill That Thistle: Rogue Sprayers, Bootlegged Chemicals, Wicked Weeds, and the Kansas Chemical Laws, 1945--1980 (/isis/citation/CBB001200584/)

Article Ceranski, Beate; (2008)
Tauschwirtschaft, Reputationsökonomie, Bürokratie: Strukturen des Radiummarktes vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg (/isis/citation/CBB000930735/)

Article Waldemar Kuligowski; (March 2019)
How “Poland Entered Europe”: The Motorway as a Space of Neoliberalism (/isis/citation/CBB588990884/)

Article Filip, Florin Gheorgie; Herrera-Viedma, Enrique; (Winter 2014)
Big Data in the European Union (/isis/citation/CBB746863947/)

Article Schwabl, Herbert; (2013)
The Mercury Puzzle: Tibetan Medicines and the Pharmaceutical Regulations in the European Union--Assessments and Opportunities (/isis/citation/CBB001510480/)

Article König, Ariane; (2007)
Democratizing Decision-Making on Food Safety in the EU: Closing Gaps between Principles of Governance and Practice (/isis/citation/CBB000830104/)

Book Vig, Norman J.; Faure, Michael G.; (2004)
Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union (/isis/citation/CBB000830072/)

Article Caroline Lucas; (March 2019)
The Democracy Lag: Updating Electoral Law and the Need for a Digital Bill of Rights [Opinion] (/isis/citation/CBB142512373/)

Chapter Blavascunas, Eunice; (2013)
Signals in the Forest: Cultural Boundaries of Science in Białowieża, Poland (/isis/citation/CBB001420344/)

Article Hadrien Macq; Élise Tancoigne; Bruno J. Strasser; (2020)
From Deliberation to Production: Public Participation in Science and Technology Policies of the European Commission (1998–2019) (/isis/citation/CBB505305997/)

Article Anja Bauer; Alexander Bogner; (2020)
Let’s (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues (/isis/citation/CBB333309152/)

Article Alex Faulkner; (2019)
Special Treatment? Flexibilities in the Politics of Regenerative Medicine’s Gatekeeping Regimes in the UK (/isis/citation/CBB938616624/)

Article Klaus Hoeyer; (July 2015)
Regulatory Anatomy: How “Safety Logics” Structure European Transplant Medicine (/isis/citation/CBB387324455/)

Article Kristrún Gunnarsdóttir; Kjetil Rommetveit; (2017)
The Biometric Imaginary: (dis)trust in a Policy Vacuum (/isis/citation/CBB939896615/)

Article Alison Cool; (August 2019)
Impossible, unknowable, accountable: Dramas and dilemmas of data law (/isis/citation/CBB709306750/)

Article Karolin S. Follis; (November 2017)
Vision and Transterritory: The Borders of Europe (/isis/citation/CBB478284294/)