Article ID: CBB546323901

Cosmopolitics of a Regulatory Fit: The Case of Nanocellulose (2019)

unapi

Nanocellulose is an organic material envisioned to have the capacity to replace potentially harmful, non-renewable materials such as plastics. Before the material can be utilized commercially within the EU, its safety needs to be officially proven. This is envisioned to happen through the REACH chemicals regulation that controls the market entry of new substances. The regulation proposes concepts to support regulatory discretion and test methods to be used in risk assessments. While so doing, REACH puts forward assumptions pertaining to the critical qualities of innovations. However, when regulation is used to appraise radically new innovations, the assumptions need to be re-evaluated. Yet, analysis of expert accounts suggests that nanocellulose cannot be easily fit into the categorizations and analytical engagements that REACH proposes. For the purposes of a regulatory adoption, the problems are transformed into epistemological issues to be resolved through the incremental closing of knowledge gaps. Some of the key qualities of the material seem not to gain recognition in the regulatory realm that is in the making. At worst, the official strategy may create conditions for risks which the regulation is supposed to eradicate while, at the same time, hindering the development of plastic-substituting solutions.

...More
Citation URI
http://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB546323901/

Similar Citations

Article Nerea Calvillo; (June 2018)
Political airs: From monitoring to attuned sensing air pollution (/isis/citation/CBB938785365/) unapi

Article Thomas A. Hemphill; (2016)
Regulating Nanomaterials: A Case for Hybrid Governance (/isis/citation/CBB954604545/) unapi

Article Hindmarsh, Richard; Gottweis, Herbert; (2005)
Recombinant Regulation: The Asilomar Legacy 30 Years On (/isis/citation/CBB000640400/) unapi

Article Waldemar Kuligowski; (March 2019)
How “Poland Entered Europe”: The Motorway as a Space of Neoliberalism (/isis/citation/CBB588990884/) unapi

Article Filip, Florin Gheorgie; Herrera-Viedma, Enrique; (Winter 2014)
Big Data in the European Union (/isis/citation/CBB746863947/) unapi

Book Vig, Norman J.; Faure, Michael G.; (2004)
Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union (/isis/citation/CBB000830072/) unapi

Article Caroline Lucas; (March 2019)
The Democracy Lag: Updating Electoral Law and the Need for a Digital Bill of Rights [Opinion] (/isis/citation/CBB142512373/) unapi

Chapter Blavascunas, Eunice; (2013)
Signals in the Forest: Cultural Boundaries of Science in Białowieża, Poland (/isis/citation/CBB001420344/) unapi

Article Hadrien Macq; Élise Tancoigne; Bruno J. Strasser; (2020)
From Deliberation to Production: Public Participation in Science and Technology Policies of the European Commission (1998–2019) (/isis/citation/CBB505305997/) unapi

Article Anja Bauer; Alexander Bogner; (2020)
Let’s (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues (/isis/citation/CBB333309152/) unapi

Article Klaus Hoeyer; (July 2015)
Regulatory Anatomy: How “Safety Logics” Structure European Transplant Medicine (/isis/citation/CBB387324455/) unapi

Article Kristrún Gunnarsdóttir; Kjetil Rommetveit; (2017)
The Biometric Imaginary: (dis)trust in a Policy Vacuum (/isis/citation/CBB939896615/) unapi

Article Alison Cool; (August 2019)
Impossible, unknowable, accountable: Dramas and dilemmas of data law (/isis/citation/CBB709306750/) unapi

Article Karolin S. Follis; (November 2017)
Vision and Transterritory: The Borders of Europe (/isis/citation/CBB478284294/) unapi

Authors & Contributors
Hindmarsh, Richard
Gottweis, Herbert
Vig, Norman J.
Faure, Michael G.
König, Ariane
Ceranski, Beate
Journals
Science as Culture
Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy
Public Understanding of Science
Science, Technology and Human Values
Social Studies of Science
NTM: Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin
Publishers
MIT Press
Concepts
Science and politics
Legislative and administrative regulations
Public policy
Technoscience; science and technology studies
Regulation
Biotechnology
Places
European Union
Europe
United States
Poland
Australia
New Zealand
Times
21st century
20th century, late
20th century
20th century, early
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment