Birch, Jonathan (Author)
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Volume: 76
Pages: 101186
I distinguish two roles for a fitness concept in the context of explaining cumulative adaptive evolution: fitness as a predictor of gene frequency change, and fitness as a criterion for phenotypic improvement. Critics of inclusive fitness argue, correctly, that it is not an ideal fitness concept for the purpose of predicting gene-frequency change, since it relies on assumptions about the causal structure of social interaction that are unlikely to be exactly true in real populations, and that hold as approximations only given a specific type of weak selection. However, Hamilton took this type of weak selection, on independent grounds, to be responsible for cumulative assembly of complex adaptations. In this special context, I argue that inclusive fitness is distinctively valuable as a criterion for improvement and a standard for optimality. Yet to call inclusive fitness a criterion for improvement and a standard for optimality is not to make any claim about the frequency with which inclusive fitness optimization actually occurs in nature. This is an empirical question that cannot be settled by theory alone. I close with some reflections on the place of inclusive fitness in the long running clash between ‘causalist’ and ‘statisticalist’ conceptions of fitness.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Philippe Huneman;
(2019)
Revisiting Darwinian teleology: A case for inclusive fitness as design explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB392966411/)
Article
James DiFrisco;
(2017)
Functional explanation and the problem of functional equivalence
(/isis/citation/CBB378954890/)
Article
Mameli, Matteo;
(2004)
Nongenetic Selection and Nongenetic Inheritance
(/isis/citation/CBB000410746/)
Article
Sober, Elliott;
Hecht Orzack, Steven;
(2003)
Common Ancestry and Natural Selection
(/isis/citation/CBB000410733/)
Article
Pierrick Bourrat;
(2020)
Natural selection and the reference grain problem
(/isis/citation/CBB530242611/)
Article
Brian McLoone;
(2020)
Population and organismal perspectives on trait origins
(/isis/citation/CBB139456486/)
Article
Tyler D. P. Brunet;
W. Ford Doolittle;
Joseph P. Bielawski;
(2021)
The role of purifying selection in the origin and maintenance of complex function
(/isis/citation/CBB268148463/)
Essay Review
Schlosser, Gerhard;
(2003)
Naturalizing Functions: Unity beyond Pluralism?
(/isis/citation/CBB001566903/)
Book
Gouyon, Pierre-Henri;
(2002)
Gene Avatars: The Neo-Darwinian Theory of Evolution
(/isis/citation/CBB000201388/)
Chapter
Ruse, Michael;
(2004)
Adaptive Landscapes and Dynamic Equilibrium: The Spencerian Contribution to Twentieth-Century American Evolutionary Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB000520042/)
Article
Wouters, Arno G.;
(2003)
Four Notions of Biological Function
(/isis/citation/CBB000340829/)
Article
Hugh Desmond;
(2018)
Natural selection, plasticity, and the rationale for largest-scale trends
(/isis/citation/CBB970270245/)
Book
Gayon, Jean;
de Ricqlès, Armand;
(2010)
Les fonctions: des organismes aux artifacts
(/isis/citation/CBB001023153/)
Article
Aaron Wells;
(2020)
Kant, Linnaeus, and the economy of nature
(/isis/citation/CBB872058525/)
Book
McLaughlin, Peter;
(2001)
What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems
(/isis/citation/CBB000502485/)
Article
Cédric Paternotte;
(2020)
Social evolution and the individual-as-maximising-agent analogy
(/isis/citation/CBB692281691/)
Book
Ruse, Michael;
Travis, Joseph;
(2009)
Evolution: The First Four Billion Years
(/isis/citation/CBB001232307/)
Article
Sandy C. Boucher;
(2021)
Biological Teleology, Reductionism, and Verbal Disputes
(/isis/citation/CBB536738665/)
Article
Amundson, Ron;
(2000)
Against Normal Function
(/isis/citation/CBB000770644/)
Article
Alan Grafen;
(2019)
Should we ask for more than consistency of Darwinism with Mendelism?
(/isis/citation/CBB453166142/)
Be the first to comment!