University vs. Research Institute? The Dual Pillars of German Science Production, 1950–2010 (2020)
Jennifer Dusdal (Author)
Justin J. W. Powell (Author)
David P. Baker (Author)
Yuan Chih Fu (Author)
Yahya Shamekhi (Author)
Manfred Stock (Author)
Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy
Volume: 58
Issue: 3
Pages: 319-342
The world’s third largest producer of scientific research, Germany, is the origin of the research university and the independent, extra-university research institute. Its dual-pillar research policy differentiates these organizational forms functionally: universities specialize in advanced research-based teaching; institutes specialize intensely on research. Over the past decades this policy affected each sector differently: while universities suffered a lingering “legitimation crisis,” institutes enjoyed deepening “favored sponsorship”—financial and reputational advantages. Universities led the nation’s reestablishment of scientific prominence among the highly competitive European and global science systems after WWII. But sectoral analysis of contributions to science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medical and health journal publications (1950–2010) finds that Germany’s small to medium-sized independent research institutes have made significant, growing contributions, particularly in publishing in higher impact journals proportionally more than their size. Simultaneously—despite dual-pillar policy implications—the university sector continues to be absolutely and relatively successful; not eclipsed by the institutes. Universities have consistently produced two-thirds of the nation’s publications in the highest quality journals since at least 1980 and have increased publications at a logarithmic rate; higher than the international mean. Indeed, they led Germany into the global mega-science style of production. Contrary to assumed benefits of functional differentiation, our results indicate that relative to their size, each sector has produced approximately similar publication records. While institutes have succeeded, the larger university sector, despite much less funding growth, has remained fundamental to German science production. Considering these findings, we discuss the future utility of the dual-pillar policy.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Bragesjö, Fredrik;
Elzinga, Aant;
Kasperowski, Dick;
(2012)
Continuity or Discontinuity? Scientific Governance in the Pre-History of the 1977 Law of Higher Education and Research in Sweden
(/isis/citation/CBB001211958/)
Article
Philipps, Axel;
(2011)
Errichtung und Zurechnung von Ressortforschungseinrichtungen. Eine Frage des Bedarfs an wissenschaftlicher Expertise?
(/isis/citation/CBB001220450/)
Book
Urban, Wayne J.;
(2010)
More Than Science and Sputnik: The National Defense Education Act of 1958
(/isis/citation/CBB001032662/)
Chapter
Cummings, Dolan;
(2005)
Think Tanks and Intellectual Authority Outside the University: Information Technocracy or Republic of Letters?
(/isis/citation/CBB001000220/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy [Review Essay Number 1500174]
(/isis/citation/CBB001500177/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001500174/)
Book
Mirowski, Philip;
(2011)
Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001210019/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy [Review Essay Number 1500174]
(/isis/citation/CBB001500175/)
Chapter
Arlette Jappe;
Thomas Heinze;
(2016)
Institutional Context and Growth of New Research Fields. Comparison Between State Universities in Germany and the USA
(/isis/citation/CBB709748948/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy [Review Essay Number 1500174]
(/isis/citation/CBB001500176/)
Article
Burgess, Michael M.;
(2014)
From “Trust Us” to Participatory Governance: Deliberative Publics and Science Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001420046/)
Article
Logar, Nathaniel;
Anadon, Laura Diaz;
Narayanamurti, Venkatesh;
(2014)
Semiconductor Research Corporation: A Case Study in Cooperative Innovation Partnerships
(/isis/citation/CBB001420877/)
Article
Baldini, Nicola;
Fini, Riccardo;
Grimaldi, Rosa;
Sobrero, Maurizio;
(2014)
Organisational Change and the Institutionalisation of University Patenting Activity in Italy
(/isis/citation/CBB001420874/)
Chapter
Kneller, Robert;
(2010)
The Changing Governance of Japanese Public Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001420858/)
Article
Müller, Ruth;
(2014)
Postdoctoral Life Scientists and Supervision Work in the Contemporary University: A Case Study of Changes in the Cultural Norms of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001420879/)
Article
Paul, Eward;
(2013)
50 Years of Experimental Particle Physics in Bonn. A Personal Recollection
(/isis/citation/CBB001320784/)
Book
Groen, Adriaan in 't;
(2009)
De Wende en Humboldts erfenis. De utopie voorbij
(/isis/citation/CBB001024410/)
Book
Elsner, Norbert;
Rupke, Nicolaas A.;
(2009)
Wissenswelten---Bildungswelten: Im Auftrag der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen und der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
(/isis/citation/CBB001023147/)
Book
Whitley, Richard;
Gläser, Jochen;
Engwall, Lars;
(2010)
Reconfiguring Knowledge Production: Changing Authority Relationships in the Sciences and Their Consequences for Intellectual Innovation
(/isis/citation/CBB001420853/)
Book
Weingart, Peter;
Lentsch, Justus;
(2008)
Wissen, Beraten, Entscheiden. Form und Funktion wissenschaftlicher Politikberatung in Deutschland
(/isis/citation/CBB001023461/)
Be the first to comment!