Over the last 20 years, the concept of natural selection has been highly debated in the philosophy of biology. Yet, most discussions on this topic have focused on the questions of whether natural selection is a causal process and whether it can be distinguished from drift. In this paper, I identify another sort of problem with respect to natural selection. I show that, in so far as a classical definition of fitness includes the transmission of a type between generations as part of the definition, it seems difficult to see how the fitness of an entity, following this definition, could be description independent. In fact, I show that by including type transmission as part of the definition of fitness, changing the grain at which the type of an entity is described can change the fitness of that entity. If fitness is not grain-of-description independent, this further propagates to the process of natural selection itself. I call this problem the ‘reference grain problem’. I show that it can be linked to the reference class problem in probability theory. I tentatively propose two solutions to it.
...More
Article
Sober, Elliott;
Hecht Orzack, Steven;
(2003)
Common Ancestry and Natural Selection
Article
Birch, Jonathan;
(2012)
The Negative View of Natural Selection
Article
Miguel García-Valdecasas;
Terrence W. Deacon;
(2024)
Biological functions are causes, not effects: A critique of selected effects theories
Article
Razeto-Barry, Pablo;
Frick, Ramiro;
(2011)
Probabilistic Causation and the Explanatory Role of Natural Selection
Article
Ben Bradley;
(2022)
Natural selection according to Darwin: Cause or effect?
Article
(2000)
The developmental systems perspective in the philosophy of biology
Article
Jonathan Birch;
(2019)
Inclusive fitness as a criterion for improvement
Article
André Ariew;
Collin Rice;
Yasha Rohwer;
(2015)
Autonomous-Statistical Explanations and Natural Selection
Article
Ariew, André;
(2003)
Ernst Mayr's “Ultimate/Proximate” Distinction Reconsidered and Reconstructed
Article
Cédric Paternotte;
(2020)
Social evolution and the individual-as-maximising-agent analogy
Article
Hugh Desmond;
(2018)
Natural selection, plasticity, and the rationale for largest-scale trends
Article
Alan Grafen;
(2019)
Should we ask for more than consistency of Darwinism with Mendelism?
Book
Ruse, Michael;
Travis, Joseph;
(2009)
Evolution: The First Four Billion Years
Article
Philippe Huneman;
(2019)
Revisiting Darwinian teleology: A case for inclusive fitness as design explanation
Thesis
Pritchard, Christopher Bryn;
(2005)
The Normal Curve of Evolutionary Biology, 1869--1877, with Special Referenceto the Support Given to Francis Galton by George Darwin
Article
Glymour, Bruce;
(1999)
Population Level Causation and a Unified Theory of Natural Selection
Article
Brian McLoone;
(2020)
Population and organismal perspectives on trait origins
Article
Vermaas, Pieter E.;
Houkes, Wybo;
(2003)
Ascribing Functions to Technical Artefacts: A Challenge to Etiological Accounts of Functions
Thesis
Hendrikse, Jesse Love;
(2006)
Explanation and Inheritance
Book
Michael A. Flannery;
(2018)
Nature's Prophet: Alfred Russel Wallace and His Evolution from Natural Selection to Natural Theology
Be the first to comment!