Article ID: CBB526089134

Neurobiological Limits and the Somatic Significance of Love: Caregivers’ Engagements with Neuroscience in Scottish Parenting Programmes (2020)

unapi

While parents have long received guidance on how to raise children, a relatively new element of this involves explicit references to infant brain development, drawing on brain scans and neuroscientific knowledge. Sometimes called ‘brain-based parenting’, this has been criticised from within sociological and policy circles alike. However, the engagement of parents themselves with neuroscientific concepts is far less researched. Drawing on 22 interviews with parents/carers of children (mostly aged 0–7) living in Scotland, this article examines how they account for their (non-)use of concepts and understandings relating to neuroscience. Three normative tropes were salient: information about children’s processing speed, evidence about deprived Romanian orphans in the 1990s, and ideas relating to whether or not children should ‘self-settle’ when falling asleep. We interrogate how parents reflexively weigh and judge such understandings and ideas. In some cases, neuroscientific knowledge was enrolled by parents in ways that supported biologically reductionist models of childhood agency. This reductionism commonly had generative effects, enjoining new care practices and producing particular parent and infant subjectivities. Notably, parents do not uncritically adopt or accept (sometimes reductionist) neurobiological and/or psychological knowledge; rather, they reflect on whether and when it is applicable to and relevant for raising their children. Thus, our respondents draw on everyday epistemologies of parenting to negotiate brain-based understandings of infant development and behaviour, and invest meaning in these in ways that cannot be fully anticipated (or appreciated) within straightforward celebrations or critiques of the content of parenting programmes drawing on neuropsychological ideas.

...More
Included in

Article Susanne Schregel; Tineke Broer (2020) Introduction: Contested Narratives of the Mind and the Brain: Neuro/Psychological Knowledge in Popular Debates and Everyday Life. History of the Human Sciences (pp. 3-11). unapi

Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB526089134/

Similar Citations

Article Cliodhna O’Connor; Helene Joffe; (September 2015)
How the Public Engages With Brain Optimization: The Media-mind Relationship (/isis/citation/CBB441371620/)

Thesis Anna Wexler; (2017)
Sparking Controversy: The Contested Use of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (/isis/citation/CBB716280426/)

Book Jonna Brenninkmeijer; (2016)
Neurotechnologies of the Self: Mind, Brain and Subjectivity (/isis/citation/CBB963271466/)

Article Alessio Plebe; (2018)
The Search of “Canonical” Explanations for the Cerebral Cortex (/isis/citation/CBB473323388/)

Article Cornelius Borck; (2016)
How we may think: Imaging and writing technologies across the history of the neurosciences (/isis/citation/CBB917883611/)

Article Pareti, Germana; (2017)
Le radici lontane della neuroscienza delle reti. (/isis/citation/CBB948024614/)

Book Noam Chomsky; Andrea Moro; (2022)
The Secrets of Words (/isis/citation/CBB085410471/)

Article Karen Yan; Jonathon Hricko; (2017)
Brain networks, structural realism, and local approaches to the scientific realism debate (/isis/citation/CBB179415275/)

Book Catherine Malabou; (2019)
Morphing Intelligence: From IQ Measurement to Artificial Brains (/isis/citation/CBB862832155/)

Book S. Matthew Liao; (2016)
Moral Brains: The Neuroscience of Morality (/isis/citation/CBB296087243/)

Article Vivek Verma; Keerthana Samanthapudi; Ratujit Raviprakash; (2016)
Classic Studies on the Potential of Stem Cell Neuroregeneration (/isis/citation/CBB916680462/)

Article Fernando Vidal; (2019)
What Makes Neuroethics Possible? (/isis/citation/CBB007853781/)

Book Lori A. Schmied; (2019)
The Advance of Neuroscience: Twelve Topics from the Victorian Era to Today (/isis/citation/CBB066337856/)

Article Victoria Pitts-Taylor; (2019)
Neurobiologically Poor? Brain Phenotypes, Inequality, and Biosocial Determinism (/isis/citation/CBB381754775/)

Book Peter A. Bandettini; (2020)
fMRI (/isis/citation/CBB645468002/)

Article Marta Vassallo; Mario Picozzi; (2023)
Managing brain-hype: understanding and discriminating overemphasized brain-based allegations (/isis/citation/CBB605434145/)

Article Linda Bryder; (2020)
Challenging New Zealand’s Icon, Sir Frederic Truby King (/isis/citation/CBB174426145/)

Authors & Contributors
Picozzi, Mario
Shread, Carolyn
Liao, S. Matthew
Yan, Karen
Hricko, Jonathan
Keerthana Samanthapudi
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Science, Technology and Human Values
History of the Human Sciences
Medicina Historica
Social Studies of Science
Social History of Medicine
Publishers
MIT Press
Palgrave Macmillan
Oxford University Press
McFarland
Columbia University Press
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT
Concepts
Neurosciences
Brain
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Imaging technology
Brain localization
Poverty
People
Andrea Moro
King, Truby
Chomsky, Noam
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
20th century, late
19th century
20th century, early
18th century
Places
New Zealand
India
Great Britain
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment