Reiners, Christiane (Author)
Bliersbach, Markus (Author)
Marniok, Karl (Author)
Science and Education
Volume: 26
Issue: 5
Pages: 583-610
Understanding Nature of Science (NOS) is a central component of scientific literacy, which is agreed upon internationally, and consequently has been a major educational goal for many years all over the globe. In order to justify the promotion of an adequate understanding of NOS, educators have developed several arguments, among them the cultural argument. But what is behind this argument? In order to answer this question, C. P. Snow’s vision of two cultures was used as a starting point. In his famous Rede Lecture from 1959, he complained about a wide gap between the arts and humanities on the one hand and sciences on the other hand. While the representatives of the humanities refer to themselves as real intellectuals, the scientists felt rather ignored as a culture, despite the fact that their achievements had been so important for Western society. Thus, Snow argued that as these intellectual cultures were completely different from each other, a mutual understanding was impossible. The first European Regional IHPST Conference took up the cultural view on science again. Thus, the topic of the conference “Science as Culture in the European Context” encouraged us to look at the two cultures and to figure out possibilities to bridge the gap between them in chemistry teacher education. For this reason, we put together three studies—one theoretical and two independent research projects (one dealing with creativity in science, the other with scientific laws and theories) which contribute to our main research field (promoting an understanding of NOS)—in order to address the cultural argument for understanding science from an educational point of view. Among the consented tenets of what understanding NOS implies in an educational context, there are aspects which are associated mainly with the humanities, like the tentativeness of knowledge, creativity, and social tradition, whereas others seem to have a domain-specific meaning, like empirical evidence, theories and laws, and the role of technology. Thus, the cultural argument for understanding science invites us not only to consider domain-specific concepts but also to reflect on similarities between science and the humanities by way of examples.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Harman, Oren;
Galison, Peter;
(2008)
Epistemic Virtues and Leibnizian Dreams: On the Shifting Boundaries between Science, Humanities, and Faith
(/isis/citation/CBB001030484/)
Article
Sebastian De Haro;
(2020)
Science and Philosophy: A Love–Hate Relationship
(/isis/citation/CBB240802012/)
Article
Ortolano, Guy;
(2008)
The Literature and the Science of “Two Cultures” Historiography
(/isis/citation/CBB000930752/)
Article
Welsh, Caroline;
(2009)
Die Stimmung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Natur- und Geisteswissenschaften. Ein Blick auf deren Trennungsgeschichte aus der Perspektive einer Denkfigur
(/isis/citation/CBB000933299/)
Article
Bont, Raf de;
Wils, Kaat;
(2008)
Kennis in meervoud. Voor een ruimhartige wetenschapsgeschiedenis
(/isis/citation/CBB000950340/)
Book
Kagan, Jerome;
(2009)
The Three Cultures: Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, and the Humanities in the Twenty-First Century
(/isis/citation/CBB001021287/)
Article
Ofran, Yanay;
(2008)
The Two Cultures and Systems Biology: How Philosophy Starts Where Science Ends
(/isis/citation/CBB001030486/)
Book
Kellert, Stephen H.;
(2008)
Borrowed Knowledge: Chaos Theory and the Challenge of Learning Across Disciplines
(/isis/citation/CBB000820168/)
Article
Franzel, Sean;
(2014)
A “Popular,” “Private” Lecturer? Kant's Theory and Practice of University Instruction
(/isis/citation/CBB001201785/)
Article
Weingart, Peter;
(2012)
Minerva---50 Years Reflecting on Science in Society
(/isis/citation/CBB001211959/)
Book
Kris Rutten;
Stefaan Blancke;
Ronald Soetaert;
(2018)
Perspectives on Science and Culture
(/isis/citation/CBB362738776/)
Review
Kai Horsthemke;
(2018)
Review of "Perspectives on Science and Culture"
(/isis/citation/CBB801319448/)
Book
Willard McCarty;
Geoffrey E. R. Lloyd;
Aparecida Vilaça;
(2022)
Science in the Forest, Science in the Past: Further Interdisciplinary Explorations
(/isis/citation/CBB549358382/)
Book
Douglas L. Medin;
Megan Bang;
(2014)
Who's Asking?: Native Science, Western Science, and Science Education
(/isis/citation/CBB627288146/)
Article
Day, Michael A.;
(2004)
I. I. Rabi: The Two Cultures and the Universal Culture of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000641784/)
Article
Vassilieva, Julia;
(2010)
Russian Psychology at the Turn of the 21st Century and Post-Soviet Reforms in the Humanities Disciplines
(/isis/citation/CBB001033692/)
Chapter
Gläser, Jochen;
Lange, Stefan;
Laudel, Grit;
Schimank, Uwe;
(2010)
The Limits of Universality: How Field-Specific Epistemic Conditions Affect Authority Relations and Their Consequences
(/isis/citation/CBB001420864/)
Article
Fisch, Menachem;
(2008)
Taking the Linguistic Turn Seriously
(/isis/citation/CBB001030487/)
Book
García Albea, Esteban;
(2001)
Historia y Humanidades en Neurología
(/isis/citation/CBB000530373/)
Article
Biagioli, Mario;
(2008--2009)
Postdisciplinary Liaisons: Science Studies and the Humanities
(/isis/citation/CBB001033587/)
Be the first to comment!