How Do Science Communication Practitioners View Scientists and Audiences in Relation to Public Engagement Activities? A Research Note Concerning the Marine Sciences in Portugal (2017)
Bruno M. L. Pinto (Author)
José L. Costa (Author)
Henrique N. Cabral (Author)
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
Volume: 37
Issue: 3
Pages: 159-166
This exploratory study is focused on the perceptions of science communication practitioners about the activities of scientists and the audiences of the marine sciences outreach in Portugal. Using the qualitative method of thematic analysis and collecting data through semistructured interviews of 14 practitioners of diverse professions, backgrounds, ages, and stages of career, it was found that the role of marine scientists in this area is traditionally viewed as reduced, but with a slight improvement in the past 5 to 10 years. Despite having a historical connection with and curiosity about the sea, audiences were considered to have a mostly utilitarian interest in the marine sciences. Most practitioners had a view of science communication connected to the knowledge deficit model, with a minority articulating a more dialogical model. Although there are signs of conflict between science communicators and scientists, the proliferation of training opportunities in science communication at the national level, the perceived increase of interest and participation of marine scientists in public communication in the past years, and the consolidation of science communicators as part of the scientific community offer positive prospects for the future of outreach of marine sciences in Portugal.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Vermeulen, Niki;
Parker, John N.;
Penders, Bart;
(2013)
Understanding Life Together: A Brief History of Collaboration in Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB001320293/)
Article
Christy Spackman;
Gary A. Burlingame;
(June 2018)
Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production
(/isis/citation/CBB215070697/)
Article
Owen Marshall;
(2022)
Un-silencing an Experimental Technique: Listening to the Electrical Penetration Graph
(/isis/citation/CBB827332902/)
Article
Devasmita Chakraverty;
Sarah N. Newcomer;
Kelly Puzio;
Robert H. Tai;
(2018)
It Runs in the Family: The Role of Family and Extended Social Networks in Developing Early Science Interest
(/isis/citation/CBB531316217/)
Article
Melanie Smallman;
(August 2020)
‘Nothing to do with the science’: How an elite sociotechnical imaginary cements policy resistance to public perspectives on science and technology through the machinery of government
(/isis/citation/CBB153866236/)
Article
Denisa Kera;
(2017)
Science Artisans and Open Science Hardware
(/isis/citation/CBB090977579/)
Article
Thomas Krendl Gilbert;
Andrew Loveridge;
(February 2021)
Subjectifying objectivity: Delineating tastes in theoretical quantum gravity research
(/isis/citation/CBB805036052/)
Article
Tu, Wen-Ling;
(June 2019)
Combating Air Pollution through Data Generation and Reinterpretation: Community Air Monitoring in Taiwan
(/isis/citation/CBB155719256/)
Article
Marianne Ryghaug;
Tomas Moe Skjølsvold;
Sara Heidenreich;
(April 2018)
Creating energy citizenship through material participation
(/isis/citation/CBB950810562/)
Article
Noela Invernizzi;
(2020)
Public participation and democratization: Effects on the production and consumption of science and technology
(/isis/citation/CBB850234205/)
Article
Phil Brown;
(2021)
From the Radical Psychology Movement to STS: A Journey From the 1960s in Multiple Parts
(/isis/citation/CBB099951762/)
Article
Peat Leith;
Frank Vanclay;
(November 2015)
Translating Science to Benefit Diverse Publics: Engagement Pathways for Linking Climate Risk, Uncertainty, and Agricultural Identities
(/isis/citation/CBB370881735/)
Article
César Guzmán Tovar;
(2018)
Fractured scientific subjectivities. International mobility as an option and obligation
(/isis/citation/CBB474347032/)
Article
Lara Houston;
Jennifer Gabrys;
Helen Pritchard;
(2019)
Breakdown in the Smart City: Exploring Workarounds with Urban-sensing Practices and Technologies
(/isis/citation/CBB885135788/)
Article
Thomas Völker;
Ângela Guimarães Pereira;
(2023)
“What Was That Word? It’s Part of Ensuring Its Future Existence” Exploring Engagement Collectives at the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre
(/isis/citation/CBB083165853/)
Article
Jan-Peter Voß;
Jannik Schritt;
Volkan Sayman;
(February 2022)
Politics at a distance: Infrastructuring knowledge flows for democratic innovation
(/isis/citation/CBB229106240/)
Article
Heidrun Åm;
Gisle Solbu;
Knut H Sørensen;
(April 2021)
The imagined scientist of science governance
(/isis/citation/CBB130803417/)
Article
Nadine Levin;
Sabine Leonelli;
Dagmara Weckowska;
David Castle;
John Dupré;
(2016)
How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB530775467/)
Article
Jan-Peter Voß;
Nina Amelung;
(October 2016)
Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement
(/isis/citation/CBB261047944/)
Article
Rosa Nan Leunbach;
Kristian H. Nielsen;
(2019)
Exploring the Dialogical Space of Hybrid Forums: The “Predictably Unpredictable” Case of Radioactive Waste Management in Denmark, 2003-2018
(/isis/citation/CBB878608684/)
Be the first to comment!