Current debates surrounding the virtues and shortcomings of randomization are symptomatic of a lack of appreciation of the fact that causation can be inferred by two distinct inference methods, each requiring its own, specific experimental design. There is a non-statistical type of inference associated with controlled experiments in basic biomedical research; and a statistical variety associated with randomized controlled trials in clinical research. I argue that the main difference between the two hinges on the satisfaction of the comparability requirement, which is in turn dictated by the nature of the objects of study, namely homogeneous or heterogeneous populations of biological systems. Among other things, this entails that the objection according to which randomized experiments fail to provide better evidence for causation because randomization cannot guarantee comparability is mistaken.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Alexander R. Fiorentino;
Olaf Dammann;
(2015)
Evidence, illness, and causation: An epidemiological perspective on the Russo–Williamson Thesis
Article
Anya Plutynski;
(2021)
Is cancer a matter of luck?
Article
Peter Keating;
Alberto Cambrosio;
Nicole C. Nelson;
(2016)
“Triple negative breast cancer”: Translational research and the (re)assembling of diseases in post-genomic medicine
Article
Joana Formosinho;
Adam Bencard;
Louise Whiteley;
(2022)
Environmentality in biomedicine: Microbiome research and the perspectival body
Book
James Woodward;
(2021)
Causation with a Human Face: Normative Theory and Descriptive Psychology
Article
André Ariew;
Yasha Rohwer;
Collin Rice;
(2017)
Galton, reversion and the quincunx: The rise of statistical explanation
Book
Edward Shorter;
Max Fink;
(2018)
The Madness of Fear: A History of Catatonia
Article
Hane Htut Maung;
(2016)
Diagnosis and causal explanation in psychiatry
Article
Mauricio V Daker;
(2019)
The theory of symptom complexes, mind and madness
Article
Tudor M. Baetu;
(2020)
Pain in psychology, biology and medicine: Some implications for pain eliminativism
Article
Fritz Handerer;
Peter Kinderman;
Carsten Timmermann;
Sara J Tai;
(2021)
How did mental health become so biomedical? The progressive erosion of social determinants in historical psychiatric admission registers
Article
Nikos Karfakis;
(2018)
The biopolitics of CFS/ME
Article
Saana Jukola;
(2017)
On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research – A comment on Stegenga
Article
Kalewold Hailu Kalewold;
(2020)
Race and medicine in light of the new mechanistic philosophy of science
Article
Steffen Dörre;
(2021)
Epistemologische Neupositionierungen. Alexander Mitscherlich zwischen „naturwissenschaftlicher Methodik“, Psychoanalyse und Psychosomatischer Medizin
Article
Hans-Georg Hofer;
Volker Roelcke;
(2021)
Subjekt, Statistik, Wissenschaft: Epistemologische Positionierungen und Evidenzpraktiken in der klinischen Medizin seit 1949
Article
Veli-Pekka Parkkinen;
(2016)
Robustness and evidence of mechanisms in early experimental atherosclerosis research
Article
Holmes, Brooke;
(2013)
Causality, Agency, and the Limits of Medicine
Book
Broadbent, Alex;
(2013)
Philosophy of Epidemiology
Article
Prince, Brian D.;
(2014)
The Metaphysics of Bodily Health and Disease in Plato's Timaeus
Biology and Philosophy
History of Psychiatry
NTM: Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin
Apeiron: Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Be the first to comment!