A longstanding philosophical premise perceives simplicity as a desirable attribute of scientific theories. One of several raised justifications for this notion is that simple theories are more likely to indicate the true makeup of natural systems. Qualitatively parsimonious hypotheses and theories keep to a minimum the number of different postulated entities within a system. Formulation of such ontologically simple working hypotheses proved to be useful in the experimental probing of narrowly defined bio systems. It is less certain, however, whether qualitatively parsimonious theories are effective indicators of the true nature of complex biological systems. This paper assesses the success of ontologically simple theories in envisaging the makeup of three complex systems in bacteriology, immunology, and molecular biology. Evidence shows that parsimonious theories completely misconstrued the actual ontologically complex constitutions of the three examined systems. Since evolution and selective pressures typically produce ontologically intricate rather than simple bio systems, qualitatively parsimonious theories are mostly inapt indicators of the true nature of complex biological systems.
...More
Article
Miguel Escribano-Cabeza;
(2020)
Fish and Fishpond. an Ecological Reading of G.W. Leibniz’s Monadology §§ 63–70
(/isis/citation/CBB397286416/)
Article
Fridolin Gross;
Nina Kranke;
Robert Meunier;
(2019)
Pluralization Through Epistemic Competition: Scientific Change in Times of Data-Intensive Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB374064986/)
Book
Michel Morange;
(2020)
The Black Box of Biology: A History of the Molecular Revolution
(/isis/citation/CBB035364586/)
Book
Alban Frei;
(2018)
Sichtbare Netzwerke: Forschungspolitik und Life-Sciences zwischen 1990 und 2016 in der Schweiz. Eine Fallstudie zu SystemsX.ch
(/isis/citation/CBB130161050/)
Article
Fabrizio Li Vigni;
(2022)
Hayek at the Santa Fe Institute: Origins, Models, and Organization of the Cradle of Complexity Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB101266514/)
Article
Michael Fry;
(2018)
Predictive Hypotheses Are Ineffectual in Resolving Complex Biochemical Systems
(/isis/citation/CBB002665433/)
Book
Sara Green;
(2016)
Philosophy of Systems Biology: Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers
(/isis/citation/CBB545077792/)
Article
McManus, Fabrizzio;
(2012)
Development and Mechanistic Explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB001221636/)
Book
Daniel B. Drachman;
(2019)
Johns Hopkins Neurology: Half a Century of Innovation
(/isis/citation/CBB221441913/)
Chapter
Wenceslao J. Gonzalez;
Maria Jose Arrojo;
(2016)
Diversity in complexity in communication sciences: epistemological and ontological analyses
(/isis/citation/CBB116282895/)
Article
van Heur, Bas;
Leydesdorff, Loet;
Wyatt, Sally;
(June 2013)
Turning to ontology in STS? Turning to STS through ‘ontology’
(/isis/citation/CBB199076323/)
Book
Alfred I. Tauber;
(2017)
Immunity: The Evolution of an Idea
(/isis/citation/CBB791938761/)
Book
Shan Gao;
(2017)
The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics
(/isis/citation/CBB078217999/)
Article
Joshua Norton;
(2021)
Suppressing Spacetime Emergence
(/isis/citation/CBB068685265/)
Article
Robyn Yucel;
(2018)
Scientists’ Ontological and Epistemological Views about Science from the Perspective of Critical Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB219306053/)
Article
Zdenka Brzović;
Predrag Šustar;
(2020)
Postgenomics function monism
(/isis/citation/CBB311069000/)
Thesis
Valerie Racine;
(2016)
Beyond Reductionism and Emergence: A Study of the Epistemic Practices in Gene Expression Research
(/isis/citation/CBB978842577/)
Book
Giovanni Boniolo;
Marco J. Nathan;
(2016)
Philosophy of Molecular Medicine: Foundational Issues in Research and Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB433280242/)
Book
Bertolaso, Marta;
(2015)
The Future of Scientific Practice: “Bio-Techno-Logos”
(/isis/citation/CBB001422487/)
Article
Oliver M. Lean;
(2019)
Chemical arbitrariness and the causal role of molecular adapters
(/isis/citation/CBB162430966/)
Be the first to comment!