William Hughes (Author)
The dome of thought is the first study of phrenology based primarily on the popular – rather than medical – appreciation of this important and controversial pseudoscience. With detailed reference to the reports printed in popular newspapers from the early years of the nineteenth century to the fin de siècle, the book provides an unequalled insight into the Victorian public’s understanding of the techniques, assumptions and implications of defining a person’s character by way of the bumps on their skull. Highly relevant to the study of the many authors – Wilkie Collins, Charles Dickens, and George Eliot, among them – whose fiction was informed by the imagery of phrenology, The dome of thought will prove an essential resource for anybody with an interest in the popular and literary culture of the nineteenth century, including literary scholars, medical historians and the general reader.
...MoreReview Stanley Finger (2023) Review of "The dome of thought: Phrenology and the nineteenth-century popular imagination". Journal of the History of the Neurosciences (pp. 57-58).
Article
Adelene Buckland;
(2021)
Charles Dickens, Man of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB070659844/)
Book
Page, Judith W;
Smith, Elise Lawton;
(2011)
Women, Literature, and the Domesticated Landscape: England's Disciples of Flora, 1780--1870
(/isis/citation/CBB001214713/)
Article
Lustig, Harry;
Shepherd-Barr, Kristen;
(2002)
Science as Theater
(/isis/citation/CBB000300569/)
Book
Messier, Gilles;
(2012)
Our Own Devices: Stories of the Machine Age
(/isis/citation/CBB001321157/)
Article
David K. Hecht;
(2021)
Embracing Mystery: Radiation Risks and Popular Science Writing in the Early Cold War
(/isis/citation/CBB155434883/)
Article
Aimee Slaughter;
(2014)
Ray Guns and Radium: Radiation in the Public Imagination as Reflected in Early American Science Fiction
(/isis/citation/CBB404161784/)
Book
Wazeck, Milena;
(2014)
Einstein's Opponents: The Public Controversy about the Theory of Relativity in the 1920s
(/isis/citation/CBB001500393/)
Chapter
Weingart, Peter;
(2008)
Frankenstein in Entenhausen?
(/isis/citation/CBB001024361/)
Book
Rachel E. Walker;
(2022)
Beauty and the Brain: The Science of Human Nature in Early America
(/isis/citation/CBB487226567/)
Article
Jacob Lauge Thomassen;
Simon Beierholm;
(2020)
Franz Joseph Gall Came to Copenhagen, and for a Brief Moment the Brain Was the Talk of the Town
(/isis/citation/CBB935430086/)
Article
Fenneke Sysling;
(2018)
Science and Self-assessment: Phrenological Charts 1840–1940
(/isis/citation/CBB417278881/)
Article
Stanley Finger;
(2020)
Mark Twain’s Phrenological Experiment: Three Renditions of His “Small Test”
(/isis/citation/CBB316165905/)
Thesis
Marc D. Falkoff;
(1997)
Heads and tales: American letters in the age of phrenology
(/isis/citation/CBB012884668/)
Book
Joshua Nall;
(2019)
News from Mars: Mass Media and the Forging of a New Astronomy, 1860-1910
(/isis/citation/CBB549536322/)
Article
Gansky, Paul;
(2014)
Privacy's Waste Products: Touch, Contagion and Public Telephone Design
(/isis/citation/CBB001201114/)
Article
Andrews, James T.;
(2013)
An Evolving Scientific Public Sphere: State Science Enlightenment, Communicative Discourse, and Public Culture from Imperial Russia to Khrushchev's Soviet Times
(/isis/citation/CBB001320571/)
Article
Hall, James R.;
(2015)
Encountering Snakes in Early Victorian London: The First Reptile House at the Zoological Gardens
(/isis/citation/CBB001553626/)
Article
Laura Valls Plana;
(2016)
A Mammoth in the Park: Palaeontology, Press and Popular Culture in Barcelona (1870–1910)
(/isis/citation/CBB628845058/)
Chapter
Bowler, Peter J.;
(2012)
Monism in Britain: Biologists and the Rationalist Press Association
(/isis/citation/CBB001201841/)
Article
Ott, Daniel;
(2014)
Producing a Past: McCormick Harvester and Producer Populists in the 1890s
(/isis/citation/CBB001320831/)
Be the first to comment!