Article ID: CBB504631735

Methodological Signatures in Early Ethology: The Problem of Animal Subjectivity (2021)

unapi

What is the adequate terminology to talk about animal behaviour? Is terminology referring to mental or emotional states anthropomorphic and should therefore be prohibited or is it a necessary means to provide for an adequate description and should be encouraged? This question was vehemently discussed in the founding phase of Ethology as a scientific discipline and still is. This multi-layered problem can be grasped by using the concept of methodological signatures, developed by Köchy et al. (2016c). It is designed to analyse and systematically compare animal research approaches by examining their common parameters. By examining the works of Konrad Lorenz (1903–1989) and Nikolaas Tinbergen (1907–1988), this paper offers new insights both on a methodological and theoretical level. Methodologically, the application of the concept of methodological signatures is illustrated; theoretically, the principles of Classic Ethology are analysed. My aim is to illustrate how the problem of scientific access to animal subjectivity was addressed in the history of Ethology by analysing statements about animal sentience. For this purpose, I will first outline the general discussion about animal subjectivity and the tension between anthropomorphism and empirical adequacy. I introduce my own theoretical and methodological framework before presenting an analysis of Lorenz’ and Tinbergen’s methodological signatures. Thereby, I show how the question of terminology is deeply embedded in a network of epistemological, methodological and ontological concepts and establish key characteristics in regard to ethological approaches to animal subjectivity. Finally, I shed light on the possibility of using this typology to examine current frameworks of animal welfare research.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB504631735/

Similar Citations

Book Burkhardt, Richard W., Jr.; (2005)
Patterns of Behavior: Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen, and the Founding of Ethology (/isis/citation/CBB000550823/)

Chapter Burkhardt, Richard W., Jr.; (2011)
Ethology's Traveling Facts (/isis/citation/CBB001000230/)

Book Vicedo, Marga; (2013)
The Nature and Nurture of Love: From Imprinting to Attachment in Cold War America (/isis/citation/CBB001213142/)

Article Brigandt, Ingo; (2005)
The Instinct Concept of the Early Konrad Lorenz (/isis/citation/CBB000670734/)

Book Kruuk, Hans; (2003)
Niko's Nature: The Life of Niko Tinbergen and His Science of Animal Behaviour (/isis/citation/CBB000501254/)

Article Munz, Tania; (2011)
“My Goose Child Martina” (/isis/citation/CBB001220835/)

Article Richard W. Burkhardt; (2016)
Niko Tinbergen: A Message in the Archives (/isis/citation/CBB782289204/)

Article Marga Vicedo; (2018)
The ‘Disadapted’ Animal: Niko Tinbergen on Human Nature and the Human Predicament (/isis/citation/CBB918313700/)

Article Browne, Derek; (2005-2006)
Konrad Lorenz on Instinct and Phylogenetic Information (/isis/citation/CBB000931938/)

Article Dewsbury, Donald A.; (1992)
On the problems studied in ethology, comparative psychology, and animal behavior (/isis/citation/CBB000063844/)

Article Clement Levallois; (2018)
The Development of Sociobiology in Relation to Animal Behavior Studies, 1946–1975 (/isis/citation/CBB162818555/)

Authors & Contributors
Vicedo, Marga
Munz, Tania
Dewsbury, Donald A.
Burckhardt, Richard W., Jr.
Hilbert, Christopher
Böhnert, Martin
Concepts
Ethology
Animal behavior
Animal psychology
Discipline formation
Zoology
Psychology
Time Periods
20th century
20th century, late
20th century, early
19th century
Places
United States
Germany
Austria
Netherlands
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment