Article ID: CBB502442734

The Simplicity of Self-Knowledge After Avicenna (2018)

unapi

Alongside his much-discussed theory that humans are permanently, if only tacitly, self-aware, Avicenna proposed that in actively conscious self-knowers the subject and object of thought are identical. He applies to both humans and God the slogan that the self-knower is “intellect, intellecting, and object of intellection (‘aql, ‘āqil, ma‘qūl)”. This paper examines reactions to this idea in the Islamic East from the 12th-13th centuries. A wide range of philosophers such as Abū l-Barakāt al-Baghdādī, Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, al-Šahrastānī, Šaraf al-Dīn al-Mas‘ūdī, al-Abharī, al-Āmidī, and Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī raised and countered objections to Avicenna's position. One central problem was that on widely accepted definitions of knowledge – according to which knowledge is representational or consists in a relation – it seems impossible for the subject and object of knowledge to be the same. Responses to this difficulty included the idea that a self-knower is “present” to itself, or that here subject and object are different only in “aspect (i‘tibār)”., Au cours de son exposé de sa thèse si disputée selon laquelle les êtres humains sont de manière permanente, fût-ce tacitement, conscients d'eux-mêmes, Avicenne suggère que dans les auto-connaissants activement conscients, le sujet et l'objet de la pensée sont identiques. Il applique alors – à la fois aux êtres humains et à Dieu – le slogan affirmant que l'auto-connaissant est « intellect, intelligeant et intelligé » (‘aql, ‘āqil, ma‘qūl). Cet article examine les réactions à cette idée dans l'Est du monde islamique durant les 12ème et 13ème siècles. Un grand nombre de philosophes, tels Abū l-Barakāt al-Baghdādī, Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, al-Šahrastānī, Šaraf al-Dīn al-Mas‘ūdī, al-Abharī, al-Āmidī et Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī ont en effet soulevé des objections à l'encontre de la position d'Avicenne et ont apporté des réponses à ces objections. Un problème central a consisté dans le fait que selon des définitions généralement acceptées de la connaissance – d'après lesquelles la connaissance est représentationnelle ou consiste dans une relation –, il paraissait impossible pour le sujet et l'objet de la connaissance d’être le même. Des réponses à cette difficulté ont mis en place l'idée que tout autoconnaissant est « présent » à soi, ou que dans ce cas, le sujet et l'objet sont différents seulement selon l’ « aspect » (i‘tibār).

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB502442734/

Similar Citations

Article Thom, Paul; (2010)
Abharī on the Logic of Conjunctive Terms (/isis/citation/CBB000933053/)

Article Jolivet, Jean; (2000)
Al-Sahrastani critique d'Avicenne dans la lutte contre les philosophes (quelques aspects) (/isis/citation/CBB000111373/)

Article Lagerlund, Henrik; (2009)
Avicenna and Ṭūsī on Modal Logic (/isis/citation/CBB001211042/)

Article Roshdi Rashed; (2019)
IBN AL-HAYTHAM, IBN SĪNĀ, AL-ṬŪSĪ : ÉGALITÉ OU CONGRUENCE (/isis/citation/CBB521388295/)

Article Emadi, Abdorasoul; Rahimi Shrebaf, Gholamhossein; (2012)
Movement According to Ibn Sīnā and Abū al-Barakāt Baghdādī (/isis/citation/CBB001510313/)

Article Rashed, Roshdi; (2002)
Dio, la cosa e le matematiche (/isis/citation/CBB000502806/)

Book Strohmaier, Gotthard; (1999)
Avicenna (/isis/citation/CBB000111377/)

Book Dag Nikolaus Hasse; Amos Bertolacci; (2018)
The Arabic, Hebrew, and Latin Reception of Avicenna's Physics and Cosmology (/isis/citation/CBB464758264/)

Book Avicenna, ; Riet, S. van; Janssens, J.; Allard, A.; (2006)
Liber primus Naturalium: tractatus secundus, De motu et de consimilibus (/isis/citation/CBB000775245/)

Thesis Alwishah, Ahmed R. D.; (2006)
Avicenna's Philosophy of Mind: Self-Awareness and Intentionality (/isis/citation/CBB001561549/)

Book Di Martino, Carla; (2008)
Ratio Particularis: Doctrines des sens internes d'Avicenne à Thomas d'Aquin (/isis/citation/CBB000951059/)

Thesis Acar, Rahim; (2002)
Creation: A Comparative Study between Avicenna's and Aquinas' Positions (/isis/citation/CBB001562516/)

Chapter Guldentops, Guy; (2006)
James of Douai's Theory of Knowledge (/isis/citation/CBB001020127/)

Authors & Contributors
Rashed, Roshdi
Ömer Türker
Rahimi Shrebaf, Gholamhossein
Emadi, Abdorasoul
Thom, Paul
Strohmaier, Gotthard
Journals
Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Nazariyat: İslam Felsefe ve Bilim Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi (Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences)
Micrologus: Nature, Sciences and Medieval Societies
Tarikh-e Elm (The Iranian Journal for the History of Science)
Physis: Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza
History and Philosophy of Logic
Publishers
Verlag C. H. Beck
University of California, Los Angeles
Springer
Peeters
Marquette University Press
J. Vrin
Concepts
Philosophy
Arab/Islamic world, civilization and culture
Physics
Mathematics
Logic
Theories of knowledge
People
Avicenna
al-Ṭūsī, Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad Naṣīr al-Dīn
Thomas Aquinas, Saint
Ibn al-Haytham, Abū ʿAlī al-Ḥasan
Athīr al-Dīn al-Abharī
Abu al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī, Hibat Allāh Alī b. Malkā
Time Periods
Medieval
11th century
13th century
10th century
Places
Middle and Near East
Italy
France
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment