The multiple environmental crises our planet is experiencing forces us to change the ways we engage with it, especially the ones developed by scientific disciplines such as toxicology. In particular, widespread degradation should lead us to develop scientific practices that take environmental ruination as a framework condition, not only as an object of analysis. In doing so, we should take into account the practice of science at laboratories located in the peripheries of global science, institutions that have coexisted with extensive environmental and material decay from their very onset. Contributing to this task, this paper analyzes the case of Centro Nacional del Medio Ambiente (CENMA), an environmental chemistry laboratory located in Santiago, Chile. Established in mid-1990s, decades of continual budget cuts left it in a state of almost terminal ruin. In its struggle to remain relevant, CENMA developed an alternative kind of scientific practice, ruination science. Although always precarious, ruination science also tends to be well adapted to engage with impurity, resilient but fragile, and ethically entangled, prioritizing attachment and compromises over the application of certain standard recipes or procedures. Beyond its particularities, CENMA’s ruination science provides us with several valuable keys to better deal with worlds facing multiple kinds of anthropogenic degradation.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Anja Bauer;
Alexander Bogner;
(2020)
Let’s (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues
(/isis/citation/CBB333309152/)
Article
Allain J. Barnett;
Melanie G. Wiber;
(2019)
What Scientists Say about the Changing Risk Calculation in the Marine Environment under the Harper Government of Canada (2006-2015)
(/isis/citation/CBB359628559/)
Article
María Elena Giraldo;
Eliana Arancibia Gutiérrez;
(2023)
Governance in socio-environmental research: an analysis of multi-stakeholder cooperation mechanisms in two research laboratories in Yucatan, Mexico
(/isis/citation/CBB497620424/)
Book
Gabriela Méndez Cota;
(2016)
Disrupting maize: Food, biotechnology, and nationalism in contemporary Mexico
(/isis/citation/CBB012102028/)
Article
Sabine Roeser;
Udo Pesch;
(March 2016)
An Emotional Deliberation Approach to Risk
(/isis/citation/CBB657243437/)
Article
Chuncheng Liu;
(2022)
Seeing Like a State, Enacting Like an Algorithm: (Re)assembling Contact Tracing and Risk Assessment during the COVID-19 Pandemic
(/isis/citation/CBB635816935/)
Article
Alina Geampana;
(2019)
Risky Technologies: Systemic Uncertainty in Contraceptive Risk Assessment and Management
(/isis/citation/CBB376759289/)
Article
Anne Kerr;
Tineke Broer;
Emily Ross;
Sarah Cunningham Burley;
(August 2019)
Polygenic risk-stratified screening for cancer: Responsibilization in public health genomics
(/isis/citation/CBB774833590/)
Article
Woochang Lee;
Hyomin Kim;
(2022)
The Politics and Sub-Politics of Mad Cow Disease in South Korea
(/isis/citation/CBB202228566/)
Article
Dilshani Sarathchandra;
(2017)
Risky Science? Perception and Negotiation of Risk in University Bioscience
(/isis/citation/CBB691241938/)
Book
Xinxing Chen;
(2016)
Kanjian bujie zhi wu: Gongye shehui zhong zhishi quanwei de wenhua shizuo [Bad Stuff in Your Food and Other Pressing Matters: Cultural Practices in Institutionalized Epistemic Authorities in Industrial Society]
(/isis/citation/CBB838308082/)
Article
Tousignant, Noemi;
(October 2013)
Broken tempos: Of means and memory in a Senegalese university laboratory
(/isis/citation/CBB036851501/)
Article
Robin S. Gregory;
(January 2017)
The Troubling Logic of Inclusivity in Environmental Consultations
(/isis/citation/CBB229498527/)
Article
Katrin Amelang;
Susanne Bauer;
(August 2019)
Following the algorithm: How epidemiological risk-scores do accountability
(/isis/citation/CBB077353059/)
Article
Becky Mansfield;
(2021)
Deregulatory science: Chemical risk analysis in Trump’s EPA
(/isis/citation/CBB234438851/)
Article
Baker, Jonathan D.;
(June 2011)
Tradition and toxicity: Evidential cultures in the kava safety debate
(/isis/citation/CBB825126706/)
Article
Leonie Dendler;
Gaby-Fleur Böl;
(July 2021)
Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science: Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment
(/isis/citation/CBB423909656/)
Article
Tomas Ariztia;
Aline Bravo;
Ignacio Nuñez;
(2023)
Baroque tools for climate action. What do we learn from a catalogue of local technologies?
(/isis/citation/CBB596078043/)
Article
Maite P. Salazar;
Daniel Valenzuela;
Manuel Tironi;
Rodrigo A. Gutiérrez;
(2019)
The ambivalent regulator: The construction of a regulatory style for genetically modified crops in Chile
(/isis/citation/CBB036000701/)
Article
Marcelo González Gálvez;
Fernanda Gallegos;
Valentina Turén;
(2021)
Unfinished extinction and the velocities of capitalist sacrifices in the woodlands of central Chile
(/isis/citation/CBB772337866/)
Be the first to comment!