Governance in socio-environmental research: an analysis of multi-stakeholder cooperation mechanisms in two research laboratories in Yucatan, Mexico (2023)
María Elena Giraldo (Author)
Eliana Arancibia Gutiérrez (Author)
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society
Volume: 6
Issue: 1
Physical Details: Digital journal
Language: English
This article analyzes the governance of socio-environmental research in two laboratories in Yucatan, Mexico, LANRESC and LENERSE, aiming to explore the operation of cooperation mechanisms involving multi-stakeholder interaction processes that support the generation of knowledge and the development of strategies to solve complex socio-environmental issues. The analytical-conceptual framework was that of complex associative systems, a governance approach focused on understanding associative efforts among heterogeneous stakeholders seeking to reach a common objective. The present research was based on two case studies from a comparative perspective. We found that both experiences have involved the development of relatively stable networks adapted to meet their objectives. However, the less conventional LANRESC research scheme has succeeded in producing more innovative structures and mechanisms to operate as non-scientific stakeholders and be recognized as a national laboratory. For their part, the mechanisms of research organization at LENERSE, being more traditional and technocentric in nature, have not been able to fully establish links with social and business actors to participate in the regional energy transition. In the case of LENERSE, the traditional and technocentric evaluation mechanisms in place have inhibited the establishment of links with social and business actors to influence energy transitioning in the region. In both cases, betting on inter- and trans-discipline will be essential for improving their contributions to solving problems such as climate change or oil depletion.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Cook, Brian R.;
Kesby, Mike;
Fazey, Ioan;
Spray, Chris;
(October 2013)
The persistence of ‘normal’ catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference
(/isis/citation/CBB350967664/)
Article
Tibor Dessewffy;
Zsófia Nagy;
Dániel Váry;
(2017)
Where Are Those Better Angels of Our Society? Subaltern Counterpublics in Hungary During the Refugee Crisis
(/isis/citation/CBB178662793/)
Article
Sampsa Saikkonen;
Esa Väliverronen;
(2022)
The trickle-down of political and economic control: On the organizational suppression of environmental scientists in government science
(/isis/citation/CBB033206075/)
Article
Axel Philipps;
Leonie Weißenborn;
(December 2019)
Unconventional ideas conventionally arranged: A study of grant proposals for exceptional research
(/isis/citation/CBB907320584/)
Article
Allain J. Barnett;
Melanie G. Wiber;
(2019)
What Scientists Say about the Changing Risk Calculation in the Marine Environment under the Harper Government of Canada (2006-2015)
(/isis/citation/CBB359628559/)
Article
Allison Loconto;
Scott Prudham;
Steven Wolf;
(2024)
Environmental governance through metrics: Guest introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB894684908/)
Article
Eric Nost;
(2024)
‘The tool didn’t make decisions for us': metrics and the performance of accountability in environmental governance
(/isis/citation/CBB781661016/)
Article
Jenny Andersson;
Erik Westholm;
(2019)
Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders
(/isis/citation/CBB589179620/)
Article
Kristoffer Whitney;
(2019)
It’s about Time: Adaptive Resource Management, Environmental Governance, and Science Studies
(/isis/citation/CBB335286233/)
Article
Lisa Sigl;
(May 2016)
On the Tacit Governance of Research by Uncertainty: How Early Stage Researchers Contribute to the Governance of Life Science Research
(/isis/citation/CBB119230475/)
Chapter
Webster, Frank;
(2005)
Research, Universities and the Knowledge Society
(/isis/citation/CBB001000222/)
Chapter
Barnett, Ronald;
(2005)
Re-opening Research: New Amateurs or New Professsionals?
(/isis/citation/CBB001000223/)
Article
Dilshani Sarathchandra;
(2017)
Risky Science? Perception and Negotiation of Risk in University Bioscience
(/isis/citation/CBB691241938/)
Article
Sebastian Ureta;
(January 2021)
Ruination Science: Producing Knowledge from a Toxic World
(/isis/citation/CBB500426002/)
Article
Poonam Pandey;
Aviram Sharma;
(2017)
NGOs, Controversies, and “Opening Up” of Regulatory Governance of Science in India
(/isis/citation/CBB915250388/)
Book
Youyue Cai;
Jiaxin Chen;
(2018)
Abnormal people? : Psychiatry and the governance of modernity in Taiwan (Bu zheng chang de ren? : Taiwan jing shen yi xue yu xian dai xing de zhi li)
(/isis/citation/CBB044336559/)
Article
Sandra Calkins;
(October 2021)
Toxic remains: Infrastructural failure in a Ugandan molecular biology lab
(/isis/citation/CBB094400545/)
Article
Clémence Pinel;
(March 2021)
Renting Valuable Assets: Knowledge and Value Production in Academic Science
(/isis/citation/CBB574556496/)
Article
Shim, Janet K;
Darling, Katherine Weatherford;
Lappe, Martine D;
Thomson, L Katherine;
Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin;
Hiatt, Robert A;
Ackerman, Sara L;
(2014)
Homogeneity and Heterogeneity as Situational Properties: Producing---and Moving beyond?---Race in Post-Genomic Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001421183/)
Article
Nadine Levin;
Sabine Leonelli;
Dagmara Weckowska;
David Castle;
John Dupré;
(2016)
How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB530775467/)
Be the first to comment!