This paper compares the axiomatic method of David Hilbert and his school with Rudolf Carnap's general axiomatics that was developed in the late 1920s, and that influenced his understanding of logic of science throughout the 1930s, when his logical pluralism developed. The distinct perspectives become visible most clearly in how Richard Baldus, along the lines of Hilbert, and Carnap and Friedrich Bachmann analyzed the axiom system of Hilbert's Foundations of Geometry—the paradigmatic example for the axiomatization of science. Whereas Hilbert's axiomatic method started from a local analysis of individual axiom systems in which the foundations of mathematics as a whole entered only when establishing the system's consistency, Carnap and his Vienna Circle colleague Hans Hahn instead advocated a global analysis of axiom systems in general. A primary goal was to evade, or formalize ex post, mathematicians' ‘material’ talk about axiom systems for such talk was held to be error-prone and susceptible to metaphysics.
...MoreArticle Sahotra Sarkar; Thomas Uebel (2015) Introduction: Formal Epistemology and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (pp. 1-2).
Article
Köchy, Kristian;
(2010)
Vielfalt der Wissenschaften bei Carnap, Lewin und Fleck. Zur Entwicklung eines pluralen Wissenschaftskonzepts
(/isis/citation/CBB000933030/)
Book
Greg Frost-Arnold;
(2013)
Carnap, Tarski, and Quine at Harvard: Conversations on Logic, Mathematics, and Science
(/isis/citation/CBB416944911/)
Article
(2000)
Relations between Philosophy of Science and Sociology of Science in Central Europe, 1914-1945
(/isis/citation/CBB000110567/)
Chapter
Erich H. Reck;
(2013)
Hempel, Carnap, and the Covering Law Model
(/isis/citation/CBB397005257/)
Article
Jan Faye;
Rasmus Jaksland;
(2021)
What Bohr wanted Carnap to learn from quantum mechanics
(/isis/citation/CBB067212277/)
Book
Uebel, Thomas E.;
(2007)
Empiricism at the Crossroads: The Vienna Circle's Protocol-Sentence Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB001230414/)
Book
Hardcastle, Gary L.;
Richardson, Alan W.;
(2003)
Logical Empiricism in North America
(/isis/citation/CBB000410522/)
Article
Giuseppina D'Oro;
(2015)
Unlikely Bedfellows? Collingwood, Carnap and the Internal/External Distinction
(/isis/citation/CBB326639460/)
Article
Karela, Catherine;
(2010)
Hilbert on Different Notions of Completeness: A Conceptual and Historical Analysis
(/isis/citation/CBB001220619/)
Chapter
Hüttemann, Andreas;
(2009)
Pluralism and the Hypothetical in Heinrich Hertz's Philosophy of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001032106/)
Article
Martin Carrier;
(2017)
Facing the Credibility Crisis of Science: On the Ambivalent Role of Pluralism in Establishing Relevance and Reliability
(/isis/citation/CBB489861694/)
Article
Marij van Strien;
(2020)
Pluralism and anarchism in quantum physics: Paul Feyerabend's writings on quantum physics in relation to his general philosophy of science
(/isis/citation/CBB348944318/)
Article
Chantelle Marlor;
(2020)
Explaining knowledge pluralisms; the intertwining of culture and materiality
(/isis/citation/CBB344558063/)
Article
Jamie Shaw;
(2021)
Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy
(/isis/citation/CBB740430654/)
Book
Mitchell, Sandra;
(2009)
Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001020062/)
Article
Sahotra Sarkar;
(2015)
Nagel on Reduction
(/isis/citation/CBB557469066/)
Article
Justin Donhauser;
Jamie Shaw;
(2019)
Knowledge transfer in theoretical ecology: Implications for incommensurability, voluntarism, and pluralism
(/isis/citation/CBB535618423/)
Article
Rein Vihalemm;
(2016)
Chemistry and the Problem of Pluralism in Science: An Analysis Concerning Philosophical and Scientific Disagreements
(/isis/citation/CBB999713526/)
Article
Gonzalo Munévar;
(2016)
Historical Antecedents to the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend
(/isis/citation/CBB421620184/)
Article
Jamie Shaw;
(2021)
Feyerabend’s well-ordered science: how an anarchist distributes funds
(/isis/citation/CBB905453313/)
Be the first to comment!