Article ID: CBB491291156

Scholars are Failing the GPT Review Process (2024)

unapi
Included in

Article Melinda Baldwin; Brigid Vance (2024) Introduction: AI and Scholarly Publishing. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences (pp. 609-610). unapi

Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB491291156/

Similar Citations

Article Melinda Baldwin; Brigid Vance; (2024)
Introduction: AI and Scholarly Publishing

Book Nicole Howard; (2022)
Loath to Print: The Reluctant Scientific Author, 1500–1750

Article Alex Csiszar; (2024)
Blurry Authorship: Originality in Science before and after Large Language Models

Article Sergio Sismondo; (December 2019)
Academic Lives and Cultures

Article Lukas M. Verburgt; (2021)
The Works of Francis Bacon: A Victorian Classic in the History of Science

Article Dinah Pfau; Helen Piel; Florian Müller; Jakob Tschandl; Rudolf Seising; (2023)
The “KI-Rundbrief,” Its Editors, and Its Community: A Perspective on West German AI, 1975–1987

Article Biagioli, Mario; (2012)
From Ciphers to Confidentiality: Secrecy, Openness and Priority in Science

Article Claire Gantet; (2018)
Leibniz, les périodiques et l’espace savant

Article Robert E. Kohler; Lynn K. Nyhart; Arnold Thackray; (2022)
Eloge: Frances Coulborn Kohler (1938–2021)

Article Mikko Lagerspetz; (March 2021)
“The Grievance Studies Affair” Project: Reconstructing and Assessing the Experimental Design

Article Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner; Kean Birch; Maria Amuchastegui; (2022)
Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals

Article Edward J. Hackett; (July 2021)
The Ambivalence of Peer Review: Thank You ST&HV Reviewers 2019-2020

Article Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner; Sarah de Rijcke; (December 2019)
Filling in the gaps: The interpretation of curricula vitae in peer review

Article Kirsten Bell; Patricia Kingori; David Mills; (2024)
Scholarly Publishing, Boundary Processes, and the Problem of Fake Peer Reviews

Article Kirsten Bell; Patricia Kingori; David Mills; (January 2024)
Scholarly Publishing, Boundary Processes, and the Problem of Fake Peer Reviews

Article Christian Greiffenhagen; (2024)
Judging Importance before Checking Correctness: Quick Opinions in Mathematical Peer Review

Article Hirschauer, Stefan; (2010)
Editorial Judgments: A Praxeology of “Voting” in Peer Review

Article Miller, Boaz; (2009)
What Does It Mean That PRIMES Is in P? Popularization and Distortion Revisited

Article Ashley Shew; (March 2020)
Ableism, Technoableism, and Future AI

Article Alessandro Delfanti; (April 2021)
The financial market of ideas: A theory of academic social media

Authors & Contributors
Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang
Mills, David
Kirsten Bell
Patricia Kingori
Baldwin, Melinda Clare
Biagioli, Mario
Journals
Science, Technology, and Human Values
Social Studies of Science
Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences
Isis: International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences
Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences
British Journal for the History of Science
Publishers
Johns Hopkins University Press
Concepts
Scholarly publishing
Peer review
Communication within scientific contexts
Science and technology studies (STS)
Communication of scientific ideas
Artificial intelligence
People
Bacon, Francis, 1st Baron Verulam
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von
Time Periods
21st century
17th century
20th century, late
16th century
18th century
19th century
Places
West Germany
Institutions
History of Science Society
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment