On October 11, 1745, a German scientist Ewald Georg (Jürgen) Kleist in Cammin in Pommern (today Kamień Pomorski) discovered both the phenomenon of storing electricity in a glass vessel with water, and a new device – an electric capacitor. Kleist quickly and correctly announced his discovery to the scientific community.The greatest help in confirming the discovery and its publication was received by Kleist from Daniel Gralath who was active in the first Polish Society for Experimental Physics Societas Physicae Experimentalis in Gdańsk.At the beginning of 1746, in the Dutch Leiden, in the workshop of the famous professor Pieter Musschenbroek, an experiment was conducted similar to the one in Cammin. The information about the Leiden experiment quickly reached Paris, the centre of European science of that time, and which lead to a proclamation of a new, very important physical discovery. The experiment gained wide publicity in Europe thanks to numerous public repetitions. The French promoter of the Leiden experiment was physicist Jean-Antoine Nollet.The discoverer’s fame was unjustly attributed to Musschenbroek and Leiden, although Daniel Gralath reported Nollet’s letter about Kleist’s priority. From the moment of discovery to modern times, scientific publications in the field of physics and history of science often misrepresent the person of the discoverer, the place of discovery and its name.The aim of the article is to present a broad overview of the reports, descriptions and opinions contained in scientific publications about the discovery. In the review presented in the article, 117 books are divided by country of issue, language and time of publication. The most frequent errors were classified and assigned to the analyzed publications. The result turned out to be surprising, as only 6 items were free of errors, and in the remaining, 254 errors were found. Unfortunately, in both former and contemporary publications, Kleist is sometimes ignored, and even if noticed, his discovery is usually depreciated in various ways. It may come as a surprise that the first two works on the history of electrical research written in the eighteenth century by Daniel Gralath and Joseph Priestley correctly and profoundly convey the course of events and the priority of Kleist’s discovery. It turns out that the French untrue version of the history of this finding is still alive, especially in European countries, so that pupils, students and physics enthusiasts receive a false message about this important discovery.In the circle of reliable researchers in the history of science, the priority of Kleist’s discovery is widely recognized, but even they have a problem with naming the electric capacitor discovered by the Cammin physicist differently than the Leiden jar. One of the reasons for the poor knowledge of Kleist and his experiment is scant scientific literature on the subject and the ignorance of the source texts written by the Cammin explorer. This gap is bridged by a scientific monograph written by the author of the present article. The text of this paper complements the information presented in the author’s book entitled Ewald Georg Kleist – Wielki odkrywca z małego miasta (A great discoverer from a small town): Kamień Pomorski 1745 (Warszawa: Instytut Historii Nauki PAN, Stowarzyszenie Elektryków Polskich, Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie, 2018).
...More
Article
Cibelle Celestino Silva;
Peter Heering;
(2018)
Re-examining the Early History of the Leiden Jar: Stabilization and Variation in Transforming a Phenomenon into a Fact
(/isis/citation/CBB231128053/)
Article
David Evan Pence;
(2022)
Closing the Loop: Ewald von Kleist and the Origins of the Leyden Jar
(/isis/citation/CBB256458041/)
Article
Coenen, Anton;
Fine, Edward;
Zayachkivska, Oksana;
(2014)
Adolf Beck: A Forgotten Pioneer in Electroencephalography
(/isis/citation/CBB001420788/)
Article
Michael Bycroft;
(2019)
Hindsight, Tradition, and National Styles in the Prehistory of the Leyden Jar
(/isis/citation/CBB278674357/)
Article
Home, R. W.;
(1979)
Nollet and Boerhaave: A note on 18th century ideas about electricity and fire
(/isis/citation/CBB000007054/)
Article
Yamazaki, Eizo;
(1976)
L'Abbé Nollet et Benjamin Franklin: Une phase finale de la physique cartésienne; la théorie de la conservation de l'électricité et de l'expérience de Leyde
(/isis/citation/CBB000002722/)
Article
Bertucci, Paola;
(2005)
Sparking Controversy: Jean Antoine Nollet and Medical Electricity South of the Alps
(/isis/citation/CBB000610413/)
Article
(2001)
L'électricité dans ses premières grandeurs, Presentation; Electricity in its first glories (1760-1820)
(/isis/citation/CBB000100488/)
Article
Pieter Present;
(2022)
Petrus van Musschenbroek (1692–1761) and the early Leiden jar: A discussion of the neglected manuscripts
(/isis/citation/CBB861829669/)
Chapter
Licoppe, Christian;
(2003)
A French Mid-Eighteenth Century Crisis in Experimental Natural Philosophy: Nollet's Electrical Shows vs. the Devious Ways of Franklin's Electrical Atmospheres
(/isis/citation/CBB000670932/)
Book
Benguigui, Isaac;
(1984)
Théories électriques du XVIII siècle: Correspondance entre l'abbé Nollet (1700-1770) et le physicien genevois Jean Jallabert (1712-1768)
(/isis/citation/CBB000062482/)
Book
Yann Piot;
(2019)
Jean-Antoine Nollet, artisan expérimentateur: un discours technique au XVIIIe siècle
(/isis/citation/CBB338477555/)
Chapter
Carmen J. Giunta;
Vera V. Mainz;
Julianna Poole-Sawyer;
Gregory S. Girolami;
(2021)
Periodicity in Britain: The Periodic Tables of Odling and Newlands
(/isis/citation/CBB055966538/)
Chapter
Mary Virginia Orna;
Marco Fontani;
Carmen J. Giunta;
Vera V. Mainz;
Gregory S. Girolami;
(2021)
Discovery of Three Elements Predicted by Mendeleev’s Table: Gallium, Scandium, and Germanium
(/isis/citation/CBB197646237/)
Article
José Ángel Roldán Casas;
(2021)
El reconocimiento del mérito científico a través de la historia de algunos de los epónimos estadísticos más relevantes: ¿Se verifica la ley de Stigler?
(/isis/citation/CBB844603043/)
Article
Roland Jackson;
(2020)
Eunice Foote, John Tyndall and a question of priority
(/isis/citation/CBB580452378/)
Article
Laura Elizabeth Smith;
E. Allen Driggers;
(2023)
‘Ex Pede Herculem’: Sloths, Slavery, and Southern Fossil Collection in The Nineteenth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB397135024/)
Article
Yoshiteru Maeno;
Yoji Hisamatsu;
Kazuhiro Egashira;
(2023)
Kenji Yoshihara (1929-2022): Shedding Light on the Work of Masataka Ogawa on His Discovery of the Element "Nipponium." An Obituary-Tribute
(/isis/citation/CBB410779174/)
Article
John van Wyhe;
(2016)
The impact of A. R. Wallace's Sarawak Law paper reassessed
(/isis/citation/CBB120840296/)
Article
Mario M. A. Wannier;
(2023)
No Publication, No Fame: Reassessing Arnold Guyot’s (1807–1884) Pioneering Contributions to the Glacial Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB790328362/)
Be the first to comment!