This paper argues that challenges that are grand in scope such as “lifelong health and wellbeing”, “climate action”, or “food security” cannot be addressed through scientific research only. Indeed scientific research could inhibit addressing such challenges if scientific analysis constrains the multiple possible understandings of these challenges into already available scientific categories and concepts without translating between these and everyday concerns. This argument builds on work in philosophy of science and race to postulate a process through which non-scientific notions become part of science. My aim is to make this process available to scrutiny: what I call founding everyday ideas in science is both culturally and epistemologically conditioned. Founding transforms a common idea into one or more scientifically relevant ones, which can be articulated into descriptively thicker and evaluatively deflated terms and enable operationalisation and measurement. The risk of founding however is that it can invisibilise or exclude from realms of scientific scrutiny interpretations that are deemed irrelevant, uninteresting or nonsensical in the domain in question–but which may remain salient for addressing grand-in-scope challenges. The paper considers concepts of “wellbeing” in development economics versus in gerontology to illustrate this process.
...More
Thesis
Xu, Jun;
(2012)
Where Knowledge Thrives: The Role of the Metaphorical in Scientific Process
(/isis/citation/CBB001567356/)
Article
Rik Wehrens;
(2019)
Experimentation in the sociology of science: Representational and generative registers in the imitation game
(/isis/citation/CBB134994307/)
Article
Rik Wehrens;
(2019)
The Imitation Game: Response to Collins and Evans
(/isis/citation/CBB537560685/)
Book
Latour, Bruno;
(2010)
On the Cult of the Factish Gods
(/isis/citation/CBB001023108/)
Book
Vinck, Dominique;
(2010)
Sociology of Scientific Work: The Fundamental Relationship between Science and Society
(/isis/citation/CBB001020915/)
Article
Haddock, Adrian;
(2004)
Rethinking the “Strong Programme” in the Sociology of Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000470648/)
Book
Clough, Sharyn;
(2003)
Beyond Epistemology: A Pragmatist Approach to Feminist Science Studies
(/isis/citation/CBB000320297/)
Article
Nederbragt, Hubertus;
(2010)
Protocol, Pattern and Paper: Interactive Stabilization of Immunohistochemical Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB001023977/)
Book
D'Agostino, Fred;
(2010)
Naturalizing Epistemology. Thomas Kuhn and the Essential Tension
(/isis/citation/CBB001024160/)
Article
Warwick Anderson;
(2015)
Edge Effects in Science and Medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB898455581/)
Article
Robin Findlay Hendry;
(2016)
Immanent Philosophy of X
(/isis/citation/CBB983726411/)
Book
Shapin, Steven;
(2010)
Never Pure: Historical Studies of Science as If It Was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority
(/isis/citation/CBB001020407/)
Article
Kitcher, Philip;
(2002)
The Third Way: Reflections on Helen Longino's The Fate of Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000410803/)
Article
Teil, Geneviève;
(2012)
No Such Thing as Terroir? Objectivities and the Regimes of Existence of Objects
(/isis/citation/CBB001251133/)
Book
Mazzotti, Massimo;
(2008)
Knowledge as Social Order: Rethinking the Sociology of Barry Barnes
(/isis/citation/CBB000850379/)
Article
Gerardo Ienna;
Giulia Rispoli;
(2023)
Naukovedenie: the social studies of science in the USSR and their international circulation
(/isis/citation/CBB890592914/)
Essay Review
Vasco, Carlos E.;
(2000)
The illusions of scientists vs. the illusions of social epistemologists
(/isis/citation/CBB000110307/)
Thesis
Knoblauch, Joy Ruth;
(2012)
Going Soft: Architecture and the Human Sciences in Search of New Institutional Forms (1963--1974)
(/isis/citation/CBB001567384/)
Article
Lander, Bryn;
(2011)
Between Theory and Craft: Exploring the Role of Co-operation within Scientific Research Labs
(/isis/citation/CBB001220697/)
Article
Kusch, Martin;
(2004)
Rule-Scepticism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: The Bloor-Lynch Debate Revisited
(/isis/citation/CBB000651372/)
Be the first to comment!