Pincock, Christopher (Author)
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume: 73
Issue: 2
Pages: 299-323
This paper defends three claims about concrete or physical models: (i) these models remain important in science and engineering, (ii) they are often essentially idealized, in a sense to be made precise, and (iii) despite these essential idealizations, some of these models may be reliably used for the purpose of causal explanation. This discussion of concrete models is pursued using a detailed case study of some recent models of landslide generated impulse waves. Practitioners show a clear awareness of the idealized character of these models, and yet address these concerns through a number of methods. This paper focuses on experimental arguments that show how certain failures to accurately represent feature X are consistent with accurately representing some causes of feature Y, even when X is causally relevant to Y. To analyse these arguments, the claims generated by a model must be carefully examined and grouped into types. Only some of these types can be endorsed by practitioners, but I argue that these endorsed claims are sufficient for limited forms of causal explanation.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Sharon Koppman;
Cindy L. Cain;
Erin Leahey;
(2015)
The Joy of Science: Disciplinary Diversity in Emotional Accounts
(/isis/citation/CBB316630519/)
Article
Petri Ylikoski;
Julie Zahle;
(2019)
Case study research in the social sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB893149132/)
Article
Mary S. Morgan;
(2019)
Exemplification and the use-values of cases and case studies
(/isis/citation/CBB151505081/)
Book
Stuart Glennan;
(2017)
The New Mechanical Philosophy
(/isis/citation/CBB462575570/)
Book
Collin Rice;
(2021)
Leveraging Distortions: Explanation, Idealization, and Universality in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB912709886/)
Chapter
Vrishali Subramanian;
Sanjay Chandrasekharan;
Nancy J. Nersessian;
(2012)
Computational Modeling: Is This the End of Thought Experiments in Science?
(/isis/citation/CBB739614030/)
Article
Tinne Hoff Kjeldsen;
Morten Blomhøj;
(2013)
Developing Students’ Reflections on the Function and Status of Mathematical Modeling in Different Scientific Practices: History as a Provider of Cases
(/isis/citation/CBB066871358/)
Article
Remington J. Moll;
Daniel Steel;
Robert A. Montgomery;
(2016)
AIC and the challenge of complexity: A case study from ecology
(/isis/citation/CBB078857465/)
Article
Roberta L. Millstein;
(2019)
Types of experiments and causal process tracing: What happened on the Kaibab Plateau in the 1920s
(/isis/citation/CBB415130662/)
Article
Andrea Sangiacomo;
(2019)
Modelling the History of Early Modern Natural Philosophy: The Fate of the Art-Nature Distinction in the Dutch Universities
(/isis/citation/CBB246385847/)
Article
Venla Oikkonen;
(October 2017)
Affect, technoscience and textual analysis: Interrogating the affective dynamics of the Zika epidemic through media texts
(/isis/citation/CBB210701382/)
Book
W. John Kress;
Ayelet Shavit;
Aaron M. Ellison;
(2017)
Stepping in the Same River Twice: Replication in Biological Research
(/isis/citation/CBB093181884/)
Article
Stephen T. Casper;
(2022)
The anecdotal patient: brain injury and the magnitude of harm
(/isis/citation/CBB731817599/)
Article
Suárez, Edna;
(2001)
Satellite-DNA: A case-study for the evolution of experimental techniques
(/isis/citation/CBB000100743/)
Article
Tuunainen, Juha;
(2001)
Constructing Objects and Transforming Experimental Systems
(/isis/citation/CBB000101048/)
Article
Karina Alleva;
José Díez;
Lucia Federico;
(2017)
Models, theory structure and mechanisms in biochemistry: The case of allosterism
(/isis/citation/CBB541545262/)
Article
Simon Lohse;
(2021)
Scientific inertia in animal-based research in biomedicine
(/isis/citation/CBB124857110/)
Article
Pollock, Stephen;
(2013)
Econometrics: An Historical Guide for the Uninitiated
(/isis/citation/CBB001201233/)
Article
Nickelsen, Kärin;
(2009)
The Construction of a Scientific Model: Otto Warburg and the Building Block Strategy
(/isis/citation/CBB000954213/)
Article
Krohs, Ulrich;
(2012)
Convenience Experimentation
(/isis/citation/CBB001221586/)
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
Perspectives on Science
Be the first to comment!