In this article I argue that evolutionary psychological strategies for making inferences about present-day human psychology are methodologically unsound. Evolutionary psychology is committed to the view that the mind has an architecture that has been conserved since the Pleistocene, and that our psychology can be fruitfully understood in terms of the original, fitness-enhancing functions of these conserved psychological mechanisms. But for evolutionary psychological explanations to succeed, practitioners must be able to show that contemporary cognitive mechanisms correspond to those that were selected for in the environment of evolutionary adaptedness, that these present-day cognitive mechanisms are descended from the corresponding ancestral mechanisms, and that they have retained the functions of the ancestral mechanisms from which they are descended. I refer to the problem of demonstrating that these conditions obtain as “the matching problem,” argue that evolutionary psychology does not have the resources to address it, and conclude that evolutionary psychology, as it is currently understood, is therefore impossible.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Andrea Polonioli;
(2015)
Stanovich's arguments against the “adaptive rationality” project: An assessment
(/isis/citation/CBB462306928/)
Thesis
Panofsky, Aaron Leon;
(2006)
Fielding Controversy: The Genesis and Structure of Behavior Genetics
(/isis/citation/CBB001560772/)
Book
Gintis, Herbert;
(2009)
The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB001201375/)
Article
Pettitt, Paul B.;
White, Mark J.;
(2011)
Cave Men: Stone Tools, Victorian Science, and the “Primitive Mind” of Deep Time
(/isis/citation/CBB001022767/)
Article
Gamble, Clive;
Moutsiou, Theodora;
(2011)
The Time Revolution of 1859 and the Stratification of the Primeval Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB001022768/)
Book
Joseph Henrich;
(2015)
The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter
(/isis/citation/CBB259604018/)
Article
Sommer, Marianne;
(2011)
Human Tools of the European Tertiary? Artefacts, Brains and Minds in Evolutionist Reasoning, 1870--1920
(/isis/citation/CBB001022769/)
Book
Allen Buchanan;
(2020)
Our Moral Fate: Evolution and the Escape from Tribalism
(/isis/citation/CBB274495377/)
Thesis
Milam, Erika Lorraine;
(2006)
Looking for a Few Good Males: Female Choice in Evolutionary Biology, 1915--1975
(/isis/citation/CBB001560598/)
Article
Klasios, John;
(2014)
The Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mating: A Response to Buller's Critique
(/isis/citation/CBB001421061/)
Article
Driscoll, Catherine;
(2009)
On Our Best Behavior: Optimality Models in Human Behavioral Ecology
(/isis/citation/CBB000954218/)
Thesis
Jeffrey W. Lockhart;
(2022)
Establishing Sex: The Scientific Quest to Support a Controversial Binary
(/isis/citation/CBB013149328/)
Book
Stanovich, Keith E.;
(2004)
The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin
(/isis/citation/CBB000750216/)
Article
Quayshawn Spencer;
(2015)
Philosophy of race meets population genetics
(/isis/citation/CBB976825674/)
Article
Richard, Nathalie;
(2012)
Archeology, Biology, Anthropology: Human Evolution According to Gabriel de Mortillet and John Lubbock (France, England c. 1860--1870)
(/isis/citation/CBB001210305/)
Article
Pedroso, Makmiller;
(2012)
Essentialism, History, and Biological Taxa
(/isis/citation/CBB001221601/)
Article
Stephen Stich;
(2016)
Why there might not be an evolutionary explanation for psychological altruism
(/isis/citation/CBB637438090/)
Article
Suplizio, Jean;
(2006)
Evolutionary Psychology: The Academic Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB000651689/)
Book
Antonella Tramacere;
(2023)
Introduzione alle psicologie evoluzionistiche: L'origine della mente umana tra scienza e filosofia
(/isis/citation/CBB137148303/)
Article
Meer, Jitse M. van der;
(2000)
The Engagement of Religion and Biology: A Case Study in the Mediating Role of Metaphor in the Sociobiology of Lumsden and Wilson
(/isis/citation/CBB000111930/)
Be the first to comment!